David Newbery, Cambridge Energy Policy Research Group
{"title":"Implications of renewable electricity curtailment for delivered costs","authors":"David Newbery, Cambridge Energy Policy Research Group","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>At high penetration levels, the ratio of the marginal: average curtailment of an extra MW of wind is typically 3+ times its average. For a portfolio of on- and off-shore wind and solar PV, the ratio is considerably higher. With increasing methods of using potentially surplus VRE (exports, storage) average curtailment falls but the ratio of the marginal: average curtailment rises. The marginal levelised cost of VRE is inversely proportional to the Marginal Capacity Factor, which falls as marginal curtailment increases, raising concerns that reducing average curtailment may not lower the marginal cost of VRE. This paper proves this is not the case. Reducing curtailment has a magnified effect on marginal curtailment and does indeed lower the marginal cost of VRE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 108472"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325002968","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
At high penetration levels, the ratio of the marginal: average curtailment of an extra MW of wind is typically 3+ times its average. For a portfolio of on- and off-shore wind and solar PV, the ratio is considerably higher. With increasing methods of using potentially surplus VRE (exports, storage) average curtailment falls but the ratio of the marginal: average curtailment rises. The marginal levelised cost of VRE is inversely proportional to the Marginal Capacity Factor, which falls as marginal curtailment increases, raising concerns that reducing average curtailment may not lower the marginal cost of VRE. This paper proves this is not the case. Reducing curtailment has a magnified effect on marginal curtailment and does indeed lower the marginal cost of VRE.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.