Sedimentary and water column contributions to oxygen depletion considering mixing in a dynamic coast

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Zhi-Hao Zhang , Zhuo-Yi Zhu , Wen-Xia Zhang , Can-Bo Xiao , Wei Fan , Kai Tang
{"title":"Sedimentary and water column contributions to oxygen depletion considering mixing in a dynamic coast","authors":"Zhi-Hao Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhuo-Yi Zhu ,&nbsp;Wen-Xia Zhang ,&nbsp;Can-Bo Xiao ,&nbsp;Wei Fan ,&nbsp;Kai Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecss.2025.109300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Estuarine and coastal hypoxia is a worldwide problem and its occurrence and development mechanism attract great public and scientific attention. The δ<sup>18</sup>O approach is a useful option in revealing the mechanism, but the mixing interference on distinguishing water column respiration (WCR) and sedimentary oxygen respiration (SOR) remains a challenge. We conducted a survey south off the Changjiang Estuary, using dissolved oxygen concentration ([O<sub>2</sub>]), dissolved oxygen δ<sup>18</sup>O, and shipboard respiration incubations to address this question. We observed changes in [O<sub>2</sub>] and δ<sup>18</sup>O over two days (30m: +14.6 μmol L<sup>−1</sup> day<sup>−1</sup> and -0.57 ‰ day<sup>−1</sup>, 40–50m: −24.8 μmol L<sup>−1</sup> day<sup>−1</sup> and +1.73 ‰ day<sup>−1</sup>). These changes were decomposed into five budget items based on the respective concentration-(<sup>16</sup>O<sup>16</sup>O) and isotope-(<sup>18</sup>O<sup>16</sup>O) box models: WCR, SOR, shallow mixing, deep mixing, and lateral advection. On day 2, the SOR∗% assessed by multiple approaches was 61 % for 50m, comparable to the solo δ<sup>18</sup>O-approach assessed SOR% (64 %), but at 30m the SOR∗% (37 %) was significantly lower than SOR% (54 %), corresponding to a stronger mixing ratio at 30m (1.5) relative to 50m (0.6). Our results showed that WCR was the main cause of oxygen depletion at middle layer contributing 63 % of AOU, whereas for near-bottom waters SOR's role instead was more significant (61 %). This research contributes to a more detailed understanding of coastal oxygen budget and depletion, and provides scientific base for coastal hypoxia management and environmental policy making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50497,"journal":{"name":"Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science","volume":"320 ","pages":"Article 109300"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272771425001787","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estuarine and coastal hypoxia is a worldwide problem and its occurrence and development mechanism attract great public and scientific attention. The δ18O approach is a useful option in revealing the mechanism, but the mixing interference on distinguishing water column respiration (WCR) and sedimentary oxygen respiration (SOR) remains a challenge. We conducted a survey south off the Changjiang Estuary, using dissolved oxygen concentration ([O2]), dissolved oxygen δ18O, and shipboard respiration incubations to address this question. We observed changes in [O2] and δ18O over two days (30m: +14.6 μmol L−1 day−1 and -0.57 ‰ day−1, 40–50m: −24.8 μmol L−1 day−1 and +1.73 ‰ day−1). These changes were decomposed into five budget items based on the respective concentration-(16O16O) and isotope-(18O16O) box models: WCR, SOR, shallow mixing, deep mixing, and lateral advection. On day 2, the SOR∗% assessed by multiple approaches was 61 % for 50m, comparable to the solo δ18O-approach assessed SOR% (64 %), but at 30m the SOR∗% (37 %) was significantly lower than SOR% (54 %), corresponding to a stronger mixing ratio at 30m (1.5) relative to 50m (0.6). Our results showed that WCR was the main cause of oxygen depletion at middle layer contributing 63 % of AOU, whereas for near-bottom waters SOR's role instead was more significant (61 %). This research contributes to a more detailed understanding of coastal oxygen budget and depletion, and provides scientific base for coastal hypoxia management and environmental policy making.
考虑到动态海岸的混合,沉积层和水柱对氧气消耗的贡献
河口海岸缺氧是一个世界性的问题,其发生和发展机制引起了公众和科学界的广泛关注。δ18O方法是揭示水柱呼吸(WCR)和沉积氧呼吸(SOR)的有效方法,但混合干扰对区分水柱呼吸(WCR)和沉积氧呼吸(SOR)仍然是一个挑战。我们在长江口以南进行了一次调查,使用溶解氧浓度([O2])、溶解氧δ18O和船上呼吸培养来解决这个问题。我们观察到在2天内[O2]和δ18O的变化(30m: +14.6 μmol L−1 day−1和-0.57‰day−1,40-50m:−24.8 μmol L−1 day−1和+1.73‰day−1)。这些变化分别基于浓度-(16O16O)和同位素-(18O16O)盒模式分解为5个预算项目:WCR、SOR、浅混合、深混合和侧向平流。在第2天,在50m处,多种方法评估的SOR∗%为61%,与单独δ 18o方法评估的SOR%(64%)相当,但在30m处,SOR∗%(37%)显著低于SOR%(54%),对应于30m处的混合比(1.5)相对于50m(0.6)更强。我们的研究结果表明,WCR是中层缺氧的主要原因,贡献了63%的AOU,而在近底水域,SOR的作用更为显著(61%)。该研究有助于更详细地了解海岸带氧收支和耗氧量,为海岸带缺氧管理和环境政策制定提供科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science is an international multidisciplinary journal devoted to the analysis of saline water phenomena ranging from the outer edge of the continental shelf to the upper limits of the tidal zone. The journal provides a unique forum, unifying the multidisciplinary approaches to the study of the oceanography of estuaries, coastal zones, and continental shelf seas. It features original research papers, review papers and short communications treating such disciplines as zoology, botany, geology, sedimentology, physical oceanography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信