Strategic solar module stockpiling in the EU: A scenario-based analysis of costs and benefits beyond 2030

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Sebastian Zwickl-Bernhard , Maximilian Oitzinger , Helen Anais Fischer , Stian Backe
{"title":"Strategic solar module stockpiling in the EU: A scenario-based analysis of costs and benefits beyond 2030","authors":"Sebastian Zwickl-Bernhard ,&nbsp;Maximilian Oitzinger ,&nbsp;Helen Anais Fischer ,&nbsp;Stian Backe","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>What are the optimal levels of strategic solar module stockpiles in the European Union (EU) for achieving climate neutrality by 2050, and how might such stockpiles influence efforts to bolster domestic solar manufacturing and recycling industries? This paper addresses these questions, delving into the underexplored area of strategic reserves in renewable energy systems and offering actionable insights for policymakers to ensure stable solar PV deployment. Using an extended open-source energy system optimization model, 36 scenarios varying in energy costs, import dynamics, and economic factors were analyzed. The results indicate that stockpiling is cost-effective in only 8 scenarios, primarily under unfavorable import conditions. In scenarios with stockpiles, domestic manufacturing levels are, on average, lower and required later compared to scenarios without stockpiles. Stockpiles reduce import dependency by introducing temporal flexibility between module injection and withdrawal, effectively diversifying supply strategies. Additionally, they stabilize optimal wind capacities, underscoring their broader systemic role. The associated costs are modest, increasing by just 0.2<!--> <!-->% in the reference scenario aligned with the latest Ten-Year Network Development Plan. Recycling and remanufacturing are not utilized in any scenario due to their higher costs compared to imports and EU manufacturing. From these findings, three policy recommendations emerge: (i) establish a strategic stockpile equivalent to three times the annual solar PV additions during the early 2030s, (ii) foster innovation in solar module recycling and remanufacturing in the meantime to build a resilient domestic industry, and (iii) monitor technological advancements to ensure the relevance and utility of stockpiled modules.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 114626"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525001338","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What are the optimal levels of strategic solar module stockpiles in the European Union (EU) for achieving climate neutrality by 2050, and how might such stockpiles influence efforts to bolster domestic solar manufacturing and recycling industries? This paper addresses these questions, delving into the underexplored area of strategic reserves in renewable energy systems and offering actionable insights for policymakers to ensure stable solar PV deployment. Using an extended open-source energy system optimization model, 36 scenarios varying in energy costs, import dynamics, and economic factors were analyzed. The results indicate that stockpiling is cost-effective in only 8 scenarios, primarily under unfavorable import conditions. In scenarios with stockpiles, domestic manufacturing levels are, on average, lower and required later compared to scenarios without stockpiles. Stockpiles reduce import dependency by introducing temporal flexibility between module injection and withdrawal, effectively diversifying supply strategies. Additionally, they stabilize optimal wind capacities, underscoring their broader systemic role. The associated costs are modest, increasing by just 0.2 % in the reference scenario aligned with the latest Ten-Year Network Development Plan. Recycling and remanufacturing are not utilized in any scenario due to their higher costs compared to imports and EU manufacturing. From these findings, three policy recommendations emerge: (i) establish a strategic stockpile equivalent to three times the annual solar PV additions during the early 2030s, (ii) foster innovation in solar module recycling and remanufacturing in the meantime to build a resilient domestic industry, and (iii) monitor technological advancements to ensure the relevance and utility of stockpiled modules.
欧盟战略性太阳能组件储备:基于情景的2030年后成本和收益分析
欧盟(EU)到2050年实现气候中和的战略太阳能组件库存的最佳水平是多少?这些库存如何影响支持国内太阳能制造和回收行业的努力?本文解决了这些问题,深入研究了可再生能源系统中尚未开发的战略储备领域,并为政策制定者提供了可操作的见解,以确保稳定的太阳能光伏部署。采用扩展的开源能源系统优化模型,分析了36种不同能源成本、进口动态和经济因素的情景。结果表明,只有8种情况下库存具有成本效益,主要是在进口条件不利的情况下。在有库存的情况下,与没有库存的情况相比,国内制造水平平均较低,并且需要较晚。通过引入模块注入和退出之间的时间灵活性,库存减少了对进口的依赖,有效地使供应策略多样化。此外,它们稳定了最佳风力发电能力,强调了它们更广泛的系统作用。相关成本不大,根据最新的十年网络发展计划,在参考情景中仅增加0.2%。回收和再制造在任何情况下都不会被利用,因为与进口和欧盟制造相比,它们的成本更高。根据这些研究结果,提出了三项政策建议:(1)在本世纪30年代初建立相当于每年太阳能光伏新增量三倍的战略储备;(2)在此期间促进太阳能组件回收和再制造方面的创新,以建立一个有弹性的国内产业;(3)监测技术进步,以确保库存组件的相关性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信