Optimization of vehicle routing problems combining the demand urgency and road damage for multiple disasters

IF 3.7 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ran Li , Xiaofei Ye , Shuyi Pei , Xingchen Yan , Tao Wang , Jun Chen , Pengjun Zheng
{"title":"Optimization of vehicle routing problems combining the demand urgency and road damage for multiple disasters","authors":"Ran Li ,&nbsp;Xiaofei Ye ,&nbsp;Shuyi Pei ,&nbsp;Xingchen Yan ,&nbsp;Tao Wang ,&nbsp;Jun Chen ,&nbsp;Pengjun Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.jnlssr.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the context of the COVID-19 epidemic, a “double-hazard scenario” consisting of a natural disaster and a public health event simultaneously occurring is more likely to arise. However, compared with single-hazard, multiple disasters confront the challenges of complexity, diversity, and demand urgency. To improve the efficiency of emergency material distribution under multiple disasters, this study first divided multiple disasters into three categories: independent scenario, sequential scenario, and coupling scenario. A set of evaluation index systems for multiple disasters was established to quantify the urgency of demand. The routing optimization model of emergency vehicles for multiple disasters was proposed by combining demand urgency and road damage, and the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) was used to simulate and validate the model. A coupling scenario considering two typical disasters of hurricanes and epidemics was selected as a validation example, and sensitivity analysis was also performed for different algorithms, scenarios, and constraints. The results demonstrated that the proposed model could effectively address the vehicle routing problem of emergency materials in the context of multiple disasters. Compared to the NSGA, the NSGA-II was used to reduce the total delivery time, cost, and penalty cost by 15.98%, 13.60%, and 16.14%, respectively. Compared with the independent scenario, the coupling scenario increased the total delivery time and cost by 186.28% and 132.48% during the epidemic. However, it reduced the total delivery time by 4.00% and increased the delivery cost by 23.55% compared with the hurricane. Compared with the model without consideration, the model considering demand urgency and road damage reduced the total delivery time and cost by 17.88% and 8.73%, respectively. The model constructed in this study addressed the vehicle routing problem considering the demand urgency and road damage in the optimization process, particularly in the context of multiple disasters.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":62710,"journal":{"name":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","volume":"6 2","pages":"Pages 196-211"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449624000823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of the COVID-19 epidemic, a “double-hazard scenario” consisting of a natural disaster and a public health event simultaneously occurring is more likely to arise. However, compared with single-hazard, multiple disasters confront the challenges of complexity, diversity, and demand urgency. To improve the efficiency of emergency material distribution under multiple disasters, this study first divided multiple disasters into three categories: independent scenario, sequential scenario, and coupling scenario. A set of evaluation index systems for multiple disasters was established to quantify the urgency of demand. The routing optimization model of emergency vehicles for multiple disasters was proposed by combining demand urgency and road damage, and the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) was used to simulate and validate the model. A coupling scenario considering two typical disasters of hurricanes and epidemics was selected as a validation example, and sensitivity analysis was also performed for different algorithms, scenarios, and constraints. The results demonstrated that the proposed model could effectively address the vehicle routing problem of emergency materials in the context of multiple disasters. Compared to the NSGA, the NSGA-II was used to reduce the total delivery time, cost, and penalty cost by 15.98%, 13.60%, and 16.14%, respectively. Compared with the independent scenario, the coupling scenario increased the total delivery time and cost by 186.28% and 132.48% during the epidemic. However, it reduced the total delivery time by 4.00% and increased the delivery cost by 23.55% compared with the hurricane. Compared with the model without consideration, the model considering demand urgency and road damage reduced the total delivery time and cost by 17.88% and 8.73%, respectively. The model constructed in this study addressed the vehicle routing problem considering the demand urgency and road damage in the optimization process, particularly in the context of multiple disasters.
结合多种灾害的需求紧迫性和道路损坏情况优化车辆路线问题
在新冠肺炎疫情背景下,更有可能出现自然灾害和公共卫生事件同时发生的“双重危害情景”。然而,与单一灾害相比,多重灾害面临着复杂性、多样性和需求紧迫性的挑战。为了提高多重灾害下应急物资分配的效率,本研究首先将多重灾害分为独立情景、顺序情景和耦合情景三大类。建立了一套针对多种灾害的评价指标体系,量化了需求的紧迫性。结合需求紧迫性和道路毁损情况,提出了多灾害应急车辆路径优化模型,并采用非支配排序遗传算法II (NSGA-II)对模型进行了仿真验证。选取考虑飓风和流行病两种典型灾害的耦合场景作为验证例,并对不同算法、场景和约束条件进行敏感性分析。结果表明,该模型能够有效地解决多重灾害背景下应急物资的车辆路径问题。与NSGA相比,NSGA- ii的总交付时间、总成本和总处罚成本分别降低了15.98%、13.60%和16.14%。与独立情景相比,耦合情景在疫情期间总配送时间和总成本分别增加了186.28%和132.48%。但与飓风相比,总配送时间缩短了4.00%,配送成本增加了23.55%。与未考虑需求紧迫性和道路损坏的模型相比,考虑需求紧迫性和道路损坏的模型总交付时间和总成本分别缩短了17.88%和8.73%。本文构建的模型解决了优化过程中考虑需求紧迫性和道路损坏的车辆路径问题,特别是在多重灾害的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
安全科学与韧性(英文)
安全科学与韧性(英文) Management Science and Operations Research, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Safety Research
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信