Fuel from air: A techno-economic assessment of e-fuels for low-carbon aviation in China

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Shubham Tiwari , Piera Patrizio , Sylvain Leduc , Anna Stratton , Florian Kraxner
{"title":"Fuel from air: A techno-economic assessment of e-fuels for low-carbon aviation in China","authors":"Shubham Tiwari ,&nbsp;Piera Patrizio ,&nbsp;Sylvain Leduc ,&nbsp;Anna Stratton ,&nbsp;Florian Kraxner","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aviation remains one of the most challenging sectors to achieve low carbon emissions due to its heavy reliance on fossil fuels and the lack of cost-competitive alternatives. This study evaluates the potential of Direct Air Capture (DAC)-based e-fuels to meet China’s aviation fuel demand by 2050. The research assesses e-fuel production costs and resource requirements under diverse scenarios, incorporating spatio-temporal variations in electricity, water, transportation, and policies. Results show that DAC capital costs and the energy market are the primary determinants. Liquid absorbent DAC (L-DAC), with lower capital costs but higher resource demands, is suitable for resource-abundant regions, while solid absorbent DAC (S-DAC), benefiting from higher learning rates and lower resource requirements, is optimal for water-scarce, high-demand regions like Beijing and Shanghai. By 2050, China could produce 102 Mt of e-fuels, meeting 84% of its demand, requiring 3457 TWh of renewable electricity and 597 billion liters of water, 78% of which would come from desalination. E-fuel costs range from $3176/ton (S-DAC) to $3208/ton (L-DAC), remaining 2.5–4 times higher than fossil jet fuels. Achieving cost parity requires low electricity prices (∼$5/GJ), high DAC learning rates ($80–50/ton), and strong policy incentives. This could reduce e-fuel costs to $900–1000/ton. The study also evaluates an alternative pathway involving Direct Air Capture with Carbon Storage paired with fossil fuel utilization. While this route offers cost and energy efficiency, it may raise long-term sustainability concerns. These findings underscore the potential of e-fuels for net-zero aviation targets, highlighting the urgency of supportive policies to scale their deployment effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"333 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019689042500319X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aviation remains one of the most challenging sectors to achieve low carbon emissions due to its heavy reliance on fossil fuels and the lack of cost-competitive alternatives. This study evaluates the potential of Direct Air Capture (DAC)-based e-fuels to meet China’s aviation fuel demand by 2050. The research assesses e-fuel production costs and resource requirements under diverse scenarios, incorporating spatio-temporal variations in electricity, water, transportation, and policies. Results show that DAC capital costs and the energy market are the primary determinants. Liquid absorbent DAC (L-DAC), with lower capital costs but higher resource demands, is suitable for resource-abundant regions, while solid absorbent DAC (S-DAC), benefiting from higher learning rates and lower resource requirements, is optimal for water-scarce, high-demand regions like Beijing and Shanghai. By 2050, China could produce 102 Mt of e-fuels, meeting 84% of its demand, requiring 3457 TWh of renewable electricity and 597 billion liters of water, 78% of which would come from desalination. E-fuel costs range from $3176/ton (S-DAC) to $3208/ton (L-DAC), remaining 2.5–4 times higher than fossil jet fuels. Achieving cost parity requires low electricity prices (∼$5/GJ), high DAC learning rates ($80–50/ton), and strong policy incentives. This could reduce e-fuel costs to $900–1000/ton. The study also evaluates an alternative pathway involving Direct Air Capture with Carbon Storage paired with fossil fuel utilization. While this route offers cost and energy efficiency, it may raise long-term sustainability concerns. These findings underscore the potential of e-fuels for net-zero aviation targets, highlighting the urgency of supportive policies to scale their deployment effectively.
空气燃料:中国低碳航空电子燃料的技术经济评估
航空业仍然是实现低碳排放最具挑战性的行业之一,因为它严重依赖化石燃料,而且缺乏具有成本竞争力的替代品。本研究评估了直接空气捕获(DAC)为基础的电子燃料在2050年前满足中国航空燃料需求的潜力。该研究评估了不同情景下的电子燃料生产成本和资源需求,包括电力、水、交通和政策的时空变化。结果表明,DAC的资金成本和能源市场是主要决定因素。液体吸收型DAC (L-DAC)具有较低的资金成本和较高的资源需求,适用于资源丰富的地区,而固体吸收型DAC (S-DAC)具有较高的学习率和较低的资源需求,适合于北京、上海等缺水、高需求的地区。到2050年,中国可生产1.02亿吨电子燃料,满足其84%的需求,需要3457太瓦时的可再生电力和5970亿升水,其中78%将来自海水淡化。电子燃料的成本从3176美元/吨(S-DAC)到3208美元/吨(L-DAC)不等,仍然是化石航空燃料的2.5-4倍。实现成本平价需要低电价(~ 5美元/GJ)、高DAC学习率(80-50美元/吨)和强有力的政策激励。这可以将电子燃料的成本降低到每吨900-1000美元。该研究还评估了一种替代途径,包括碳储存与化石燃料利用相结合的直接空气捕获。虽然这条路线提供了成本和能源效率,但它可能会引起长期可持续性问题。这些发现强调了电子燃料在实现航空零净目标方面的潜力,强调了制定支持性政策以有效扩大其部署的紧迫性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信