CT-SEGMENTED BONE SUV IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ¹⁸F-FDG AND ⁶⁸GA-PSMA PET/CT

IF 1.8 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Alexandre Mercuri Barbosa , Maria Emília Seren Takahashi , Stephan Pinheiro Macedo Souza , Edna Marina Souza , Sérgio Querino Brunetto , Cármino Antonio de Souza , Irene Gyongyver Heidemarie Lorand-Metze , Celso Darío Ramos
{"title":"CT-SEGMENTED BONE SUV IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ¹⁸F-FDG AND ⁶⁸GA-PSMA PET/CT","authors":"Alexandre Mercuri Barbosa ,&nbsp;Maria Emília Seren Takahashi ,&nbsp;Stephan Pinheiro Macedo Souza ,&nbsp;Edna Marina Souza ,&nbsp;Sérgio Querino Brunetto ,&nbsp;Cármino Antonio de Souza ,&nbsp;Irene Gyongyver Heidemarie Lorand-Metze ,&nbsp;Celso Darío Ramos","doi":"10.1016/j.htct.2025.103803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction/Justification</h3><div>¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is widely used in the management of multiple myeloma (MM), a disease that often presents with extensive bone involvement. Radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), primarily a marker for prostate cancer, is also associated with tumor neoangiogenesis, and studies have demonstrated its uptake in MM lesions. Hybrid PET/CT imaging with both FDG and PSMA tracers allows for several quantitative metrics, enabling objective comparisons beyond visual analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aims to compare ¹⁸F-FDG and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT quantitative metrics in the skeletal system of patients with MM.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>The study included ¹⁸F-FDG and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT images acquired within a 1- to 8-day interval from 15 patients (53% male, mean age 66.7 ± 10.7 years) with symptomatic, biopsy-proven MM. CT was used to segment the entire skeleton in PET images, with the skull excluded in ¹⁸F-FDG images due to artifacts from brain uptake coregistration. SUV quantification was performed using in-house software developed in MATLAB. Descriptive statistics and individual percentage deviations between the radiotracers were used to evaluate bone mean and maximum Standardized Uptake Values (SUVmean and SUVmax). Correlation analysis between the radiotracers was conducted using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r) with a significance level of p &lt; 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For bone SUVmean, values were higher for ¹⁸F-FDG compared to ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA, with an average of 0.9 ± 0.1 vs. 0.5 ± 0.1, corresponding to a -40% ± 9% difference (range: -25% to -57%). Conversely, for bone SUVmax, values were lower for ¹⁸F-FDG compared to ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA, with an average of 8 ± 3 vs. 19 ± 14, corresponding to a 154% ± 2% difference (range: -21% to 762%). A moderate correlation was found for bone SUVmean between ¹⁸F-FDG and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA (r = 0.55, p = 0.03), while no significant correlation was observed for bone SUVmax (r = 0.17, p = 0.55).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study reveals distinct quantitative uptake patterns between ¹⁸F-FDG and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the skeletal system of MM patients. ¹⁸F-FDG exhibited significantly higher SUVmean than ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA, likely due to physiological ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in bone marrow. A moderate correlation was observed for SUVmean between the two tracers. The higher SUVmax values for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA, with no correlation with ¹⁸F-FDG SUVmax, may reflect the different biological targeting mechanisms of each tracer. This suggests that some regions of increased PSMA uptake (possibly indicating neoangiogenesis) may not correspond to areas of increased glycolysis, highlighting the potential complementary role of these radiotracers in MM evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12958,"journal":{"name":"Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 103803"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137925000719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/Justification

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is widely used in the management of multiple myeloma (MM), a disease that often presents with extensive bone involvement. Radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), primarily a marker for prostate cancer, is also associated with tumor neoangiogenesis, and studies have demonstrated its uptake in MM lesions. Hybrid PET/CT imaging with both FDG and PSMA tracers allows for several quantitative metrics, enabling objective comparisons beyond visual analysis.

Objectives

This study aims to compare ¹⁸F-FDG and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT quantitative metrics in the skeletal system of patients with MM.

Materials and Methods

The study included ¹⁸F-FDG and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT images acquired within a 1- to 8-day interval from 15 patients (53% male, mean age 66.7 ± 10.7 years) with symptomatic, biopsy-proven MM. CT was used to segment the entire skeleton in PET images, with the skull excluded in ¹⁸F-FDG images due to artifacts from brain uptake coregistration. SUV quantification was performed using in-house software developed in MATLAB. Descriptive statistics and individual percentage deviations between the radiotracers were used to evaluate bone mean and maximum Standardized Uptake Values (SUVmean and SUVmax). Correlation analysis between the radiotracers was conducted using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r) with a significance level of p < 0.05.

Results

For bone SUVmean, values were higher for ¹⁸F-FDG compared to ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA, with an average of 0.9 ± 0.1 vs. 0.5 ± 0.1, corresponding to a -40% ± 9% difference (range: -25% to -57%). Conversely, for bone SUVmax, values were lower for ¹⁸F-FDG compared to ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA, with an average of 8 ± 3 vs. 19 ± 14, corresponding to a 154% ± 2% difference (range: -21% to 762%). A moderate correlation was found for bone SUVmean between ¹⁸F-FDG and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA (r = 0.55, p = 0.03), while no significant correlation was observed for bone SUVmax (r = 0.17, p = 0.55).

Conclusion

This study reveals distinct quantitative uptake patterns between ¹⁸F-FDG and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the skeletal system of MM patients. ¹⁸F-FDG exhibited significantly higher SUVmean than ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA, likely due to physiological ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in bone marrow. A moderate correlation was observed for SUVmean between the two tracers. The higher SUVmax values for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA, with no correlation with ¹⁸F-FDG SUVmax, may reflect the different biological targeting mechanisms of each tracer. This suggests that some regions of increased PSMA uptake (possibly indicating neoangiogenesis) may not correspond to areas of increased glycolysis, highlighting the potential complementary role of these radiotracers in MM evaluation.
¹⁸f-fdg与26⁸ga-psma pet / ct在多发性骨髓瘤中的比较研究
导言/理由¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT 广泛用于多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的治疗,这种疾病通常表现为广泛的骨受累。放射性标记的前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)主要是前列腺癌的标记物,也与肿瘤新血管生成有关,研究已证实其在 MM 病灶中的摄取。本研究旨在比较¹⁸F-FDG 和⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT 在 MM 患者骨骼系统中的定量指标。材料与方法该研究纳入了 15 名经活检证实的无症状 MM 患者(53% 为男性,平均年龄为 66.7 ± 10.7 岁)在 1 到 8 天时间间隔内采集的 ¹⁸F-FDG 和⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT 图像。在 PET 图像中,CT 被用于分割整个骨骼,而在¹⁸F-FDG 图像中,由于大脑摄取核心配准产生的伪影,颅骨被排除在外。SUV 定量使用 MATLAB 开发的内部软件进行。放射性同位素之间的描述性统计和单个百分比偏差用于评估骨平均和最大标准化摄取值(SUVmean 和 SUVmax)。结果对于骨SUVmean,¹⁸F-FDG的值比⁶⁸Ga-PSMA高,平均为0.9 ± 0.1 vs. 0.5 ± 0.1,相当于-40% ± 9%的差异(范围:-25%至-57%)。相反,就骨 SUVmax 而言,¹⁸F-FDG 的数值低于⁶⁸Ga-PSMA,平均为 8 ± 3 vs. 19 ± 14,相当于 154% ± 2% 的差异(范围:-21% 至 762%)。¹⁸F-FDG和⁶⁸Ga-PSMA的骨SUVmean呈中度相关(r = 0.55,p = 0.03),而骨SUVmax无明显相关(r = 0.结论本研究揭示了 MM 患者骨骼系统中¹⁸F-FDG 和⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT 之间不同的定量摄取模式。¹⁸F-FDG的SUVmean值明显高于⁶⁸Ga-PSMA,这可能是由于骨髓对¹⁸F-FDG的生理性摄取。两种示踪剂的 SUVmean 值呈中度相关。⁶⁸Ga-PSMA的SUVmax值较高,与¹⁸F-FDG的SUVmax没有相关性,这可能反映了两种示踪剂不同的生物靶向机制。这表明,一些PSMA摄取增加的区域(可能表明新血管生成)可能与糖酵解增加的区域不一致,突出了这些放射性示踪剂在 MM 评估中的潜在互补作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1419
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信