{"title":"The aromatic plant essential oils and their hormetic effect on Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae)","authors":"Prangthip Parichanon , Roberta Ascrizzi , Maria Cristina Echeverría , Priscilla Farina , Ylenia Pieracci , Guido Flamini , Federica Semprucci , Loretta Guidi , Eleonora Grassi , Theodora Isavella Gogou , Sania Ortega-Andrade , Barbara Conti","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Essential oils (EOs) are increasingly recognized as eco-friendly alternatives to synthetic pesticides due to their biodegradability and reduced risks to non-target species. This study investigates the bioactivity of 30 EOs on <em>Rhyzopertha dominica</em>, a major pest of stored grains, with a focus on their repellency and attractiveness across varying concentrations. The area preference method (APM) was used to evaluate EO bioactivity at concentrations ranging from 0.00064 to 0.064 μL cm<sup>−2</sup>. The results revealed strong repellent or attractive activity for certain EOs, while others exhibited concentration-dependent dual effects, acting as attractants at lower concentrations and repellents at higher ones. In addition, the bioactivity shown in the APM by nine selected EOs was compared to that obtained by testing the same EOs through a two-choice behavioral bioassay (TCB) at corresponding concentrations. At a 2 % EO concentration, the TCB results indicated significant repellent activity (<em>p</em> < 0.05) for lemon verbena, palo santo, matico, pumin, cinnamon, and anise, which exhibited the strongest effects. In contrast, nutmeg demonstrated significant attractive properties (<em>p</em> < 0.05). Black pepper and mandarin EOs displayed trends toward repellency and attractiveness, respectively. Both methods confirmed the bioactivity of the EOs against <em>R. dominica</em>. These results underscore the concentration-dependent hormetic effects of EOs on <em>R. dominica</em> and highlight the importance of precise optimization in pest management strategies for their application.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 107235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425001279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Essential oils (EOs) are increasingly recognized as eco-friendly alternatives to synthetic pesticides due to their biodegradability and reduced risks to non-target species. This study investigates the bioactivity of 30 EOs on Rhyzopertha dominica, a major pest of stored grains, with a focus on their repellency and attractiveness across varying concentrations. The area preference method (APM) was used to evaluate EO bioactivity at concentrations ranging from 0.00064 to 0.064 μL cm−2. The results revealed strong repellent or attractive activity for certain EOs, while others exhibited concentration-dependent dual effects, acting as attractants at lower concentrations and repellents at higher ones. In addition, the bioactivity shown in the APM by nine selected EOs was compared to that obtained by testing the same EOs through a two-choice behavioral bioassay (TCB) at corresponding concentrations. At a 2 % EO concentration, the TCB results indicated significant repellent activity (p < 0.05) for lemon verbena, palo santo, matico, pumin, cinnamon, and anise, which exhibited the strongest effects. In contrast, nutmeg demonstrated significant attractive properties (p < 0.05). Black pepper and mandarin EOs displayed trends toward repellency and attractiveness, respectively. Both methods confirmed the bioactivity of the EOs against R. dominica. These results underscore the concentration-dependent hormetic effects of EOs on R. dominica and highlight the importance of precise optimization in pest management strategies for their application.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.