{"title":"Macho or Nerd: Perceptions of Masculinity, Social Environment, and Science Capital Utilization Among Adolescent STEM Students","authors":"Revital Duek, Ronit Kark, Svetlana Chachashvili-Bolotin","doi":"10.1007/s11199-025-01569-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current study aims to explore how varying perceptions of masculinity influence adolescent boys' attitudes toward STEM and their future engagement with STEM-related careers, with a particular focus on the differences between boys from the social center and those from the periphery in Israel. Analyzing 27 in-depth interviews with participants from the social periphery and the social center, we uncovered a pronounced difference: boys from the social periphery, who were facing economic challenges, often adhered to traditional masculinity perceptions, potentially curtailing their STEM engagement. This pattern aligns with Connell’s (1995) theory of hegemonic masculinity. In contrast, boys from the social center, who were typically more affluent, demonstrated fluid masculinity perceptions, which may encourage their participation in STEM. This difference highlights the significant role of masculinity perceptions in shaping and developing \"science capital\"— the cultural and social assets that individuals hold, which enable them to engage with and participate in scientific fields. Our findings highlight the importance of considering the socio-geographical environment to understand the acquisition and utilization of science capital. We discuss our contribution to a more nuanced theory and call for interventions that should be implemented differently among boys from the social periphery and center, to achieve equality in the accessibility and future use of science capital.</p>","PeriodicalId":48425,"journal":{"name":"Sex Roles","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sex Roles","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-025-01569-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The current study aims to explore how varying perceptions of masculinity influence adolescent boys' attitudes toward STEM and their future engagement with STEM-related careers, with a particular focus on the differences between boys from the social center and those from the periphery in Israel. Analyzing 27 in-depth interviews with participants from the social periphery and the social center, we uncovered a pronounced difference: boys from the social periphery, who were facing economic challenges, often adhered to traditional masculinity perceptions, potentially curtailing their STEM engagement. This pattern aligns with Connell’s (1995) theory of hegemonic masculinity. In contrast, boys from the social center, who were typically more affluent, demonstrated fluid masculinity perceptions, which may encourage their participation in STEM. This difference highlights the significant role of masculinity perceptions in shaping and developing "science capital"— the cultural and social assets that individuals hold, which enable them to engage with and participate in scientific fields. Our findings highlight the importance of considering the socio-geographical environment to understand the acquisition and utilization of science capital. We discuss our contribution to a more nuanced theory and call for interventions that should be implemented differently among boys from the social periphery and center, to achieve equality in the accessibility and future use of science capital.
期刊介绍:
Sex Roles: A Journal of Research is a global, multidisciplinary, scholarly, social and behavioral science journal with a feminist perspective. It publishes original research reports as well as original theoretical papers and conceptual review articles that explore how gender organizes people’s lives and their surrounding worlds, including gender identities, belief systems, representations, interactions, relations, organizations, institutions, and statuses. The range of topics covered is broad and dynamic, including but not limited to the study of gendered attitudes, stereotyping, and sexism; gendered contexts, culture, and power; the intersections of gender with race, class, sexual orientation, age, and other statuses and identities; body image; violence; gender (including masculinities) and feminist identities; human sexuality; communication studies; work and organizations; gendered development across the life span or life course; mental, physical, and reproductive health and health care; sports; interpersonal relationships and attraction; activism and social change; economic, political, and legal inequities; and methodological challenges and innovations in doing gender research.