Integrating UAV-based multispectral and thermal infrared imageries with machine learning for predicting water stress in winter wheat

IF 5.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Santosh S. Mali, Michael Scobie, Justine Baillie, Corey Plant, Sayma Shammi, Anup Das
{"title":"Integrating UAV-based multispectral and thermal infrared imageries with machine learning for predicting water stress in winter wheat","authors":"Santosh S. Mali, Michael Scobie, Justine Baillie, Corey Plant, Sayma Shammi, Anup Das","doi":"10.1007/s11119-025-10239-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Assessing spatial and temporal variations in crop water stress is vital for precision irrigation. This study utilized Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) equipped with multispectral (MSS) and thermal band (TB) sensors to map the crop water stress index (CWSI) in wheat. A water deficit experiment was conducted on winter wheat under varying irrigation levels during late vegetative, reproductive, and maturation stages. CWSI was calculated using canopy temperature, ambient air temperature, and vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Six machine learning (ML) models—linear model (LM), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and artificial neural network (ANN)—were developed for pre-heading, post-heading, and seasonal datasets. The top five vegetation indices (VIs), selected using Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), along with thermal data, were used as inputs to the ML models. Results showed that seasonal ML models outperformed those based only on pre-heading or post-heading data. Particularly, the RF model performed well, with respective R² and RMSE values of 0.87 and 0.09 for seasonal, 0.82 and 0.05 for pre-heading, and 0.93 and 0.06 for post-heading datasets. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis identified Red Normalized Value (RNV), TB, and Green Red Vegetation Index (GRVI) as key predictors of CWSI in the RF model. CWSI maps effectively captured spatial variations in water stress, aligning with irrigation management practices. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of combining UAV remote sensing and ML for precision irrigation management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20423,"journal":{"name":"Precision Agriculture","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-025-10239-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing spatial and temporal variations in crop water stress is vital for precision irrigation. This study utilized Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) equipped with multispectral (MSS) and thermal band (TB) sensors to map the crop water stress index (CWSI) in wheat. A water deficit experiment was conducted on winter wheat under varying irrigation levels during late vegetative, reproductive, and maturation stages. CWSI was calculated using canopy temperature, ambient air temperature, and vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Six machine learning (ML) models—linear model (LM), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and artificial neural network (ANN)—were developed for pre-heading, post-heading, and seasonal datasets. The top five vegetation indices (VIs), selected using Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), along with thermal data, were used as inputs to the ML models. Results showed that seasonal ML models outperformed those based only on pre-heading or post-heading data. Particularly, the RF model performed well, with respective R² and RMSE values of 0.87 and 0.09 for seasonal, 0.82 and 0.05 for pre-heading, and 0.93 and 0.06 for post-heading datasets. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis identified Red Normalized Value (RNV), TB, and Green Red Vegetation Index (GRVI) as key predictors of CWSI in the RF model. CWSI maps effectively captured spatial variations in water stress, aligning with irrigation management practices. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of combining UAV remote sensing and ML for precision irrigation management.

基于无人机的多光谱和热红外图像与机器学习相结合预测冬小麦水分胁迫
评估作物水分胁迫的时空变化对精确灌溉至关重要。本研究利用配备多光谱(MSS)和热波段(TB)传感器的无人机(uav)绘制小麦作物水分胁迫指数(CWSI)。以冬小麦为试验材料,在营养后期、生殖后期和成熟期进行了不同灌溉水平的亏水试验。CWSI是使用冠层温度、环境空气温度和蒸汽压差(VPD)来计算的。六种机器学习(ML)模型——线性模型(LM)、随机森林(RF)、决策树(DT)、支持向量机(SVM)、极端梯度增强(XGB)和人工神经网络(ANN)——分别针对标题前、标题后和季节数据集开发。使用递归特征消除(RFE)选择的前5个植被指数(VIs)以及热数据作为ML模型的输入。结果表明,季节性ML模型优于仅基于标题前或标题后数据的模型。特别是,RF模型表现良好,季节性数据集的R²和RMSE值分别为0.87和0.09,抽穗前数据集的R²和RMSE值分别为0.82和0.05,抽穗后数据集的R²和RMSE值分别为0.93和0.06。SHapley加性解释(SHAP)分析发现,红色归一化值(RNV)、TB和绿红植被指数(GRVI)是RF模型中CWSI的关键预测因子。CWSI地图有效地捕捉了水资源压力的空间变化,与灌溉管理实践保持一致。本研究验证了无人机遥感与机器学习相结合进行精准灌溉管理的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Precision Agriculture
Precision Agriculture 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
103
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Precision Agriculture promotes the most innovative results coming from the research in the field of precision agriculture. It provides an effective forum for disseminating original and fundamental research and experience in the rapidly advancing area of precision farming. There are many topics in the field of precision agriculture; therefore, the topics that are addressed include, but are not limited to: Natural Resources Variability: Soil and landscape variability, digital elevation models, soil mapping, geostatistics, geographic information systems, microclimate, weather forecasting, remote sensing, management units, scale, etc. Managing Variability: Sampling techniques, site-specific nutrient and crop protection chemical recommendation, crop quality, tillage, seed density, seed variety, yield mapping, remote sensing, record keeping systems, data interpretation and use, crops (corn, wheat, sugar beets, potatoes, peanut, cotton, vegetables, etc.), management scale, etc. Engineering Technology: Computers, positioning systems, DGPS, machinery, tillage, planting, nutrient and crop protection implements, manure, irrigation, fertigation, yield monitor and mapping, soil physical and chemical characteristic sensors, weed/pest mapping, etc. Profitability: MEY, net returns, BMPs, optimum recommendations, crop quality, technology cost, sustainability, social impacts, marketing, cooperatives, farm scale, crop type, etc. Environment: Nutrient, crop protection chemicals, sediments, leaching, runoff, practices, field, watershed, on/off farm, artificial drainage, ground water, surface water, etc. Technology Transfer: Skill needs, education, training, outreach, methods, surveys, agri-business, producers, distance education, Internet, simulations models, decision support systems, expert systems, on-farm experimentation, partnerships, quality of rural life, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信