Jader Piccin,Claudia Buchweitz,Pedro H Manfro,Rivka Barros Pereira,Fernanda Rohrsetzer,Laila Souza,Anna Viduani,Arthur Caye,Brandon A Kohrt,Valeria Mondelli,Johnna R Swartz,Helen L Fisher,Christian Kieling
{"title":"Predicting the incidence of depression in adolescence using a sociodemographic risk score: prospective follow-up of the IDEA-RiSCo study.","authors":"Jader Piccin,Claudia Buchweitz,Pedro H Manfro,Rivka Barros Pereira,Fernanda Rohrsetzer,Laila Souza,Anna Viduani,Arthur Caye,Brandon A Kohrt,Valeria Mondelli,Johnna R Swartz,Helen L Fisher,Christian Kieling","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2024-301207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nAdolescence constitutes a critical window for preventing depression, but efforts have mostly targeted single risk factors. The Identifying Depression Early in Adolescence Risk Score (IDEA-RS) integrates easily obtainable sociodemographic variables and has been able to predict future depression across diverse populations. However, its performance within a prospective cohort remains untested.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nTo evaluate the performance of the IDEA-RS in a prospective sample of adolescents participating in the IDEA Risk Stratified Cohort.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nUsing the IDEA-RS, we screened 7720 adolescents aged 14-16 years in 101 public schools in Porto Alegre, Brazil, and recruited 50 low-risk (LR) and 50 high-risk (HR) participants without depression. The incidence of depressive disorders over 3 years was assessed using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children. Statistical analysis involved Poisson regression with robust variance to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for depression onset.\r\n\r\nFINDINGS\r\nIn the HR group, 14/45 developed depression, in comparison to 5/43 in the LR group. Poisson regression analysis confirmed a higher probability of developing depression in the HR group compared with the LR group (IRR of 2.68, 95% CI 1.05 to 6.79, p=0.04).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nIn a prospective cohort of Brazilian adolescents, the IDEA-RS effectively distinguished between those at HR and LR for developing depression.\r\n\r\nCLINICAL IMPLICATIONS\r\nThese results support the usefulness of an easy-to-administer sociodemographic composite risk score for stratifying the probability of developing depression among adolescents, a promising tool to be used in a variety of global contexts, including resource-limited settings.","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Adolescence constitutes a critical window for preventing depression, but efforts have mostly targeted single risk factors. The Identifying Depression Early in Adolescence Risk Score (IDEA-RS) integrates easily obtainable sociodemographic variables and has been able to predict future depression across diverse populations. However, its performance within a prospective cohort remains untested.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the performance of the IDEA-RS in a prospective sample of adolescents participating in the IDEA Risk Stratified Cohort.
METHODS
Using the IDEA-RS, we screened 7720 adolescents aged 14-16 years in 101 public schools in Porto Alegre, Brazil, and recruited 50 low-risk (LR) and 50 high-risk (HR) participants without depression. The incidence of depressive disorders over 3 years was assessed using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children. Statistical analysis involved Poisson regression with robust variance to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for depression onset.
FINDINGS
In the HR group, 14/45 developed depression, in comparison to 5/43 in the LR group. Poisson regression analysis confirmed a higher probability of developing depression in the HR group compared with the LR group (IRR of 2.68, 95% CI 1.05 to 6.79, p=0.04).
CONCLUSION
In a prospective cohort of Brazilian adolescents, the IDEA-RS effectively distinguished between those at HR and LR for developing depression.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
These results support the usefulness of an easy-to-administer sociodemographic composite risk score for stratifying the probability of developing depression among adolescents, a promising tool to be used in a variety of global contexts, including resource-limited settings.