Assessing decarbonization strategies and industrial symbiosis in the chemical and waste-to-energy sector

IF 4.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Maria Schnyder, Jing Huo, Stefanie Hellweg
{"title":"Assessing decarbonization strategies and industrial symbiosis in the chemical and waste-to-energy sector","authors":"Maria Schnyder,&nbsp;Jing Huo,&nbsp;Stefanie Hellweg","doi":"10.1111/jiec.13616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Swiss waste-to-energy (WtE) plants are required to capture their CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by 2050 to meet the net-zero climate target, with options for underground storage (carbon capture and storage [CCS]) or utilization (carbon capture and utilization [CCU]). This opens up a synergistic opportunity for the petrochemical industry to utilize the captured CO<sub>2</sub> as a feedstock, potentially helping both sectors reduce their carbon footprints. We conducted a prospective carbon footprint analysis on various net-zero strategies within the Swiss WtE plants (CCU and CCS) and German ethylene production (CO<sub>2</sub>-based ethylene, bio-ethylene, and fossil ethylene with CCS), including scenarios of industrial symbiosis. While focusing on these two countries, the findings offer valuable insights applicable to similar sectors in other regions. All assessed pathways reduce the carbon footprint by at least 60% relative to the reference scenario (no carbon capture in WtE plants and fossil ethylene production). Bio-ethylene and direct air capture–based ethylene combined with CCS in WtE exhibit the lowest climate change impacts, achieving net negative emissions when powered by renewable electricity. However, these pathways all come with trade-offs: The availability of sustainable biomass and low-carbon electricity is limited, and future resource competition may delimit the penetration of these technology combinations. CCS in ethylene production plants could reduce emissions while utilizing existing infrastructure but does not eliminate emissions from fossil fuel extraction. Ethylene produced with CO<sub>2</sub> from WtE plants could be a viable interim solution until CCS barriers are overcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"29 2","pages":"486-502"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.13616","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Swiss waste-to-energy (WtE) plants are required to capture their CO2 emissions by 2050 to meet the net-zero climate target, with options for underground storage (carbon capture and storage [CCS]) or utilization (carbon capture and utilization [CCU]). This opens up a synergistic opportunity for the petrochemical industry to utilize the captured CO2 as a feedstock, potentially helping both sectors reduce their carbon footprints. We conducted a prospective carbon footprint analysis on various net-zero strategies within the Swiss WtE plants (CCU and CCS) and German ethylene production (CO2-based ethylene, bio-ethylene, and fossil ethylene with CCS), including scenarios of industrial symbiosis. While focusing on these two countries, the findings offer valuable insights applicable to similar sectors in other regions. All assessed pathways reduce the carbon footprint by at least 60% relative to the reference scenario (no carbon capture in WtE plants and fossil ethylene production). Bio-ethylene and direct air capture–based ethylene combined with CCS in WtE exhibit the lowest climate change impacts, achieving net negative emissions when powered by renewable electricity. However, these pathways all come with trade-offs: The availability of sustainable biomass and low-carbon electricity is limited, and future resource competition may delimit the penetration of these technology combinations. CCS in ethylene production plants could reduce emissions while utilizing existing infrastructure but does not eliminate emissions from fossil fuel extraction. Ethylene produced with CO2 from WtE plants could be a viable interim solution until CCS barriers are overcome.

瑞士的废物变能源(WtE)工厂必须在 2050 年前捕获二氧化碳排放,以实现气候净零排放目标,可选择地下封存(碳捕获与封存 [CCS])或利用(碳捕获与利用 [CCU])。这为石化行业提供了一个协同机会,将捕获的二氧化碳作为原料加以利用,从而有可能帮助这两个行业减少碳足迹。我们对瑞士 WtE 工厂(CCU 和 CCS)和德国乙烯生产(以二氧化碳为原料的乙烯、生物乙烯和含 CCS 的化石乙烯)中的各种净零战略进行了前瞻性碳足迹分析,包括工业共生方案。虽然研究重点是这两个国家,但研究结果为其他地区的类似行业提供了宝贵的启示。与参考情景(WtE 工厂和化石乙烯生产中不进行碳捕集)相比,所有被评估的途径都能减少至少 60% 的碳足迹。生物乙烯和基于空气直接捕集的乙烯与湿法乙烯中的碳捕集与封存技术相结合,对气候变化的影响最小,在使用可再生电力的情况下可实现净负排。然而,这些途径都需要权衡利弊:可持续生物质和低碳电力的供应是有限的,未来的资源竞争可能会限制这些技术组合的普及。乙烯生产厂的二氧化碳捕集与封存技术可在利用现有基础设施的同时减少排放,但并不能消除化石燃料开采产生的排放。在 CCS 障碍被克服之前,利用 WtE 工厂的二氧化碳生产乙烯可能是一个可行的临时解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信