Changes in lifespace and participation in community-based occupations of people with acquired brain injury: A mixed methods exploration 6 months following occupational therapy driving assessment

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Louise Bassingthwaighte, Louise Gustafsson, Matthew Molineux
{"title":"Changes in lifespace and participation in community-based occupations of people with acquired brain injury: A mixed methods exploration 6 months following occupational therapy driving assessment","authors":"Louise Bassingthwaighte,&nbsp;Louise Gustafsson,&nbsp;Matthew Molineux","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Changes arising from acquired brain injury may influence how individuals engage in valued community-based occupations such as driving. ‘Lifespace’ describes the area within which a person lives their life and represents opportunity for participation in out-of-home occupations. This study explored lifespace trajectory from pre- to 6 months post-occupational therapy driver assessment, to understand how, why, where, and with whom access and participation in community-based occupations is influenced by assessment outcome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Adults with acquired brain injury referred for occupational therapy driver assessment were recruited to the mixed methods study involving a travel diary, lifespace assessment, and semi-structured interviews. Qualitative analysis was guided by interpretive description.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Consumer and Community Involvement</h3>\n \n <p>No consumer and community involvement</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 38 participants (55.3% male) aged 26 to 65 years reported increased lifespace 6 months following the conduct of an occupational therapy driver assessment. There was increased engagement in leisure pursuits (175%), work (23%), and social participation (21%) with reduced participation in health management (−50%) and instrumental activities of daily living (−15.4%) occupations post-OTDA. However, lifespace was significantly related to driver status, with those who had returned to driving more likely to access their community with greater frequency and less support (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Non-drivers experienced a deteriorating restricted lifespace. Analysis of semi-structured interviews (n = 12) created three broad themes that largely differed according to driver status: (i) ‘Being me’—reconstructing occupational identity, (ii) opportunities for participation and the influence of choice, and (iii) ‘Having connection’ and impacts on wellbeing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Driver status influences the trajectory of lifespace following participation in an occupational therapy driver assessment after acquired brain injury. Drivers experienced increased lifespace with greater opportunities to control engagement in community-based occupations with flexibility and spontaneity. Non-drivers reported diminished lifespace and occupational participation trajectories and require further support to facilitate occupational adaptation to increase opportunities for engagement in away-from-home occupations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY</h3>\n \n <p>After an acquired brain injury (ABI), many people find it harder to go out and do activities away from home. A common change is losing the ability to drive. An occupational therapy driver assessment (OTDA) checks if someone is ready to drive again. This study looked at how getting back to driving, or not, affected involvement in community activities. People who returned to driving reported doing more activities, more often, and with less help. They spent more time on leisure, work, and social activities. Those who did not drive went out less, visited fewer places, and relied more on others. When they did go out, it was mostly for essential tasks like shopping and health appointments. For those not able to drive, extra services and supports are needed to help build skills. This is the first study to look at how driving is connected to taking part in community activities after a brain injury. More research is needed to confirm findings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":"72 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1630.70017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.70017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Changes arising from acquired brain injury may influence how individuals engage in valued community-based occupations such as driving. ‘Lifespace’ describes the area within which a person lives their life and represents opportunity for participation in out-of-home occupations. This study explored lifespace trajectory from pre- to 6 months post-occupational therapy driver assessment, to understand how, why, where, and with whom access and participation in community-based occupations is influenced by assessment outcome.

Methods

Adults with acquired brain injury referred for occupational therapy driver assessment were recruited to the mixed methods study involving a travel diary, lifespace assessment, and semi-structured interviews. Qualitative analysis was guided by interpretive description.

Consumer and Community Involvement

No consumer and community involvement

Results

Overall, 38 participants (55.3% male) aged 26 to 65 years reported increased lifespace 6 months following the conduct of an occupational therapy driver assessment. There was increased engagement in leisure pursuits (175%), work (23%), and social participation (21%) with reduced participation in health management (−50%) and instrumental activities of daily living (−15.4%) occupations post-OTDA. However, lifespace was significantly related to driver status, with those who had returned to driving more likely to access their community with greater frequency and less support (p < 0.001). Non-drivers experienced a deteriorating restricted lifespace. Analysis of semi-structured interviews (n = 12) created three broad themes that largely differed according to driver status: (i) ‘Being me’—reconstructing occupational identity, (ii) opportunities for participation and the influence of choice, and (iii) ‘Having connection’ and impacts on wellbeing.

Conclusion

Driver status influences the trajectory of lifespace following participation in an occupational therapy driver assessment after acquired brain injury. Drivers experienced increased lifespace with greater opportunities to control engagement in community-based occupations with flexibility and spontaneity. Non-drivers reported diminished lifespace and occupational participation trajectories and require further support to facilitate occupational adaptation to increase opportunities for engagement in away-from-home occupations.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

After an acquired brain injury (ABI), many people find it harder to go out and do activities away from home. A common change is losing the ability to drive. An occupational therapy driver assessment (OTDA) checks if someone is ready to drive again. This study looked at how getting back to driving, or not, affected involvement in community activities. People who returned to driving reported doing more activities, more often, and with less help. They spent more time on leisure, work, and social activities. Those who did not drive went out less, visited fewer places, and relied more on others. When they did go out, it was mostly for essential tasks like shopping and health appointments. For those not able to drive, extra services and supports are needed to help build skills. This is the first study to look at how driving is connected to taking part in community activities after a brain injury. More research is needed to confirm findings.

Abstract Image

获得性脑损伤患者生活空间的变化和社区职业参与:职业治疗驱动评估后6个月的混合方法探索
获得性脑损伤引起的变化可能影响个人从事有价值的社区职业,如驾驶。“生活空间”描述了一个人生活的区域,代表了参与户外职业的机会。本研究探讨了职业治疗驱动评估前至6个月的生活空间轨迹,以了解评估结果如何、为什么、在哪里以及与谁一起影响社区职业的获取和参与。方法采用旅行日记、生活空间评估和半结构化访谈等混合方法,对接受职业治疗驱动因素评估的成人获得性脑损伤患者进行研究。定性分析以解释性描述为指导。消费者和社区参与无消费者和社区参与结果总体而言,38名26至65岁的参与者(55.3%为男性)在进行职业治疗驱动因素评估后6个月报告寿命延长。在otda后,他们在休闲活动(175%)、工作(23%)和社会参与(21%)方面的参与度有所增加,在健康管理(- 50%)和日常生活工具活动(- 15.4%)方面的参与度有所降低。然而,生活空间与司机身份显著相关,那些重新开车的人更有可能以更高的频率和更少的支持访问社区(p < 0.001)。不开车的人的生活空间越来越有限。对半结构化访谈(n = 12)的分析创造了三个广泛的主题,根据司机的身份有很大的不同:(i)“做我”——重建职业身份,(ii)参与的机会和选择的影响,以及(iii)“建立联系”和对幸福感的影响。结论驾驶员状态影响后得性脑损伤后职业治疗驾驶员评估后的生活空间轨迹。司机体验到更多的生活空间,有更多的机会以灵活和自发的方式控制社区职业的参与。据报告,非司机的生活空间和职业参与轨迹减少,需要进一步支持,以促进职业适应,增加从事离家工作的机会。获得性脑损伤(ABI)后,许多人发现外出和远离家的活动变得更加困难。一个常见的变化是失去驾驶能力。职业治疗司机评估(OTDA)检查某人是否准备好再次开车。这项研究着眼于重新开车或不开车对参与社区活动的影响。重新开车的人报告说,他们做了更多的活动,更频繁,得到的帮助也更少。他们把更多的时间花在休闲、工作和社交活动上。那些不开车的人外出更少,去的地方更少,更多地依赖别人。当他们外出时,也大多是为了一些必要的任务,比如购物和健康预约。对于那些不会开车的人,需要额外的服务和支持来帮助他们培养技能。这是第一个研究脑损伤后驾驶与参加社区活动之间的关系的研究。需要更多的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信