Changes in lifespace and participation in community-based occupations of people with acquired brain injury: A mixed methods exploration 6 months following occupational therapy driving assessment

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Louise Bassingthwaighte, Louise Gustafsson, Matthew Molineux
{"title":"Changes in lifespace and participation in community-based occupations of people with acquired brain injury: A mixed methods exploration 6 months following occupational therapy driving assessment","authors":"Louise Bassingthwaighte,&nbsp;Louise Gustafsson,&nbsp;Matthew Molineux","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Changes arising from acquired brain injury may influence how individuals engage in valued community-based occupations such as driving. ‘Lifespace’ describes the area within which a person lives their life and represents opportunity for participation in out-of-home occupations. This study explored lifespace trajectory from pre- to 6 months post-occupational therapy driver assessment, to understand how, why, where, and with whom access and participation in community-based occupations is influenced by assessment outcome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Adults with acquired brain injury referred for occupational therapy driver assessment were recruited to the mixed methods study involving a travel diary, lifespace assessment, and semi-structured interviews. Qualitative analysis was guided by interpretive description.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Consumer and Community Involvement</h3>\n \n <p>No consumer and community involvement</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 38 participants (55.3% male) aged 26 to 65 years reported increased lifespace 6 months following the conduct of an occupational therapy driver assessment. There was increased engagement in leisure pursuits (175%), work (23%), and social participation (21%) with reduced participation in health management (−50%) and instrumental activities of daily living (−15.4%) occupations post-OTDA. However, lifespace was significantly related to driver status, with those who had returned to driving more likely to access their community with greater frequency and less support (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Non-drivers experienced a deteriorating restricted lifespace. Analysis of semi-structured interviews (n = 12) created three broad themes that largely differed according to driver status: (i) ‘Being me’—reconstructing occupational identity, (ii) opportunities for participation and the influence of choice, and (iii) ‘Having connection’ and impacts on wellbeing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Driver status influences the trajectory of lifespace following participation in an occupational therapy driver assessment after acquired brain injury. Drivers experienced increased lifespace with greater opportunities to control engagement in community-based occupations with flexibility and spontaneity. Non-drivers reported diminished lifespace and occupational participation trajectories and require further support to facilitate occupational adaptation to increase opportunities for engagement in away-from-home occupations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY</h3>\n \n <p>After an acquired brain injury (ABI), many people find it harder to go out and do activities away from home. A common change is losing the ability to drive. An occupational therapy driver assessment (OTDA) checks if someone is ready to drive again. This study looked at how getting back to driving, or not, affected involvement in community activities. People who returned to driving reported doing more activities, more often, and with less help. They spent more time on leisure, work, and social activities. Those who did not drive went out less, visited fewer places, and relied more on others. When they did go out, it was mostly for essential tasks like shopping and health appointments. For those not able to drive, extra services and supports are needed to help build skills. This is the first study to look at how driving is connected to taking part in community activities after a brain injury. More research is needed to confirm findings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":"72 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1630.70017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.70017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Changes arising from acquired brain injury may influence how individuals engage in valued community-based occupations such as driving. ‘Lifespace’ describes the area within which a person lives their life and represents opportunity for participation in out-of-home occupations. This study explored lifespace trajectory from pre- to 6 months post-occupational therapy driver assessment, to understand how, why, where, and with whom access and participation in community-based occupations is influenced by assessment outcome.

Methods

Adults with acquired brain injury referred for occupational therapy driver assessment were recruited to the mixed methods study involving a travel diary, lifespace assessment, and semi-structured interviews. Qualitative analysis was guided by interpretive description.

Consumer and Community Involvement

No consumer and community involvement

Results

Overall, 38 participants (55.3% male) aged 26 to 65 years reported increased lifespace 6 months following the conduct of an occupational therapy driver assessment. There was increased engagement in leisure pursuits (175%), work (23%), and social participation (21%) with reduced participation in health management (−50%) and instrumental activities of daily living (−15.4%) occupations post-OTDA. However, lifespace was significantly related to driver status, with those who had returned to driving more likely to access their community with greater frequency and less support (p < 0.001). Non-drivers experienced a deteriorating restricted lifespace. Analysis of semi-structured interviews (n = 12) created three broad themes that largely differed according to driver status: (i) ‘Being me’—reconstructing occupational identity, (ii) opportunities for participation and the influence of choice, and (iii) ‘Having connection’ and impacts on wellbeing.

Conclusion

Driver status influences the trajectory of lifespace following participation in an occupational therapy driver assessment after acquired brain injury. Drivers experienced increased lifespace with greater opportunities to control engagement in community-based occupations with flexibility and spontaneity. Non-drivers reported diminished lifespace and occupational participation trajectories and require further support to facilitate occupational adaptation to increase opportunities for engagement in away-from-home occupations.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

After an acquired brain injury (ABI), many people find it harder to go out and do activities away from home. A common change is losing the ability to drive. An occupational therapy driver assessment (OTDA) checks if someone is ready to drive again. This study looked at how getting back to driving, or not, affected involvement in community activities. People who returned to driving reported doing more activities, more often, and with less help. They spent more time on leisure, work, and social activities. Those who did not drive went out less, visited fewer places, and relied more on others. When they did go out, it was mostly for essential tasks like shopping and health appointments. For those not able to drive, extra services and supports are needed to help build skills. This is the first study to look at how driving is connected to taking part in community activities after a brain injury. More research is needed to confirm findings.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信