Current Clinical Practices and Future Perspectives for Primary Healthcare Use of Point-of-Care Devices: A Scoping Review

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Abdulaziz Alrubayyi, Reza Fahimi, Muntaha Hassan, Jason Madan, Olalekan A. Uthman
{"title":"Current Clinical Practices and Future Perspectives for Primary Healthcare Use of Point-of-Care Devices: A Scoping Review","authors":"Abdulaziz Alrubayyi,&nbsp;Reza Fahimi,&nbsp;Muntaha Hassan,&nbsp;Jason Madan,&nbsp;Olalekan A. Uthman","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/4742851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Expanding access to screening through primary care is essential to address changes in disease patterns, patients’ needs, and demographics. Point-of-care test (POCT) devices play a crucial role in providing primary care and have positive operational and economic impacts compared to central laboratories. Despite their importance, the implementation of POCT devices in primary care remains low. This scoping review aims to map the current evidence on POCT types and their current uses in primary care.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A scoping review was conducted using the framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley, and further refined by Levac et al. and the Joanna Briggs Institute. Our process included five stages: identifying the research question, identifying relevant studies, study selection, charting the data, and collating, summarizing, and reporting the results. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for studies published between 2018 and 2023 on the use of POCTs in primary care settings for adult populations. Our findings were summarized using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> The search yielded 43,913 publications, of which, 167 met the inclusion criteria. From these studies, biomarker detection tests were used in 33.5%, antibody tests in 21.6%, other POCTs in 17.4%, POC technologies in 11.4%, antigen tests in 8.4%, and POC molecular tests in 7.8%. Across studies, 46.7% targeted communicable diseases, 39.5% targeted noncommunicable diseases, and 13.8% for other diseases. POC devices are mainly used for communicable diseases in urban healthcare settings, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). POC devices are used primarily for noncommunicable diseases in urban healthcare settings, particularly in high-income countries.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> This scoping review has mapped the evidence and highlighted gaps regarding POCTs used in primary care. The findings can be used to design and effectively implement sustainable patients’ healthcare journeys to accommodate the changes in patients’ demographics and healthcare needs.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/4742851","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/4742851","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Expanding access to screening through primary care is essential to address changes in disease patterns, patients’ needs, and demographics. Point-of-care test (POCT) devices play a crucial role in providing primary care and have positive operational and economic impacts compared to central laboratories. Despite their importance, the implementation of POCT devices in primary care remains low. This scoping review aims to map the current evidence on POCT types and their current uses in primary care.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted using the framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley, and further refined by Levac et al. and the Joanna Briggs Institute. Our process included five stages: identifying the research question, identifying relevant studies, study selection, charting the data, and collating, summarizing, and reporting the results. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for studies published between 2018 and 2023 on the use of POCTs in primary care settings for adult populations. Our findings were summarized using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

Results: The search yielded 43,913 publications, of which, 167 met the inclusion criteria. From these studies, biomarker detection tests were used in 33.5%, antibody tests in 21.6%, other POCTs in 17.4%, POC technologies in 11.4%, antigen tests in 8.4%, and POC molecular tests in 7.8%. Across studies, 46.7% targeted communicable diseases, 39.5% targeted noncommunicable diseases, and 13.8% for other diseases. POC devices are mainly used for communicable diseases in urban healthcare settings, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). POC devices are used primarily for noncommunicable diseases in urban healthcare settings, particularly in high-income countries.

Conclusion: This scoping review has mapped the evidence and highlighted gaps regarding POCTs used in primary care. The findings can be used to design and effectively implement sustainable patients’ healthcare journeys to accommodate the changes in patients’ demographics and healthcare needs.

Abstract Image

当前临床实践和未来前景的初级卫生保健使用点护理设备:范围审查
背景:通过初级保健扩大筛查的可及性对于应对疾病模式、患者需求和人口统计数据的变化至关重要。与中心实验室相比,即时检测(POCT)设备在提供初级保健方面发挥着至关重要的作用,具有积极的运营和经济影响。尽管POCT设备很重要,但在初级保健中的实施仍然很低。本综述的目的是绘制POCT类型及其目前在初级保健中的应用的现有证据。方法:使用Arksey和O 'Malley提出的框架进行范围审查,并由Levac等人和Joanna Briggs研究所进一步完善。我们的研究过程包括五个阶段:确定研究问题、确定相关研究、研究选择、绘制数据图表、整理、总结和报告结果。我们检索了MEDLINE (Ovid)、CINAHL、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和谷歌Scholar,检索了2018年至2023年间发表的关于成人初级保健机构使用poct的研究。我们的研究结果用描述性统计和专题分析进行了总结。结果:共检索到文献43913篇,其中167篇符合纳入标准。在这些研究中,生物标志物检测检测占33.5%,抗体检测占21.6%,其他POCTs占17.4%,POC技术占11.4%,抗原检测占8.4%,POC分子检测占7.8%。在所有研究中,46.7%以传染病为目标,39.5%以非传染性疾病为目标,13.8%以其他疾病为目标。POC设备主要用于城市卫生保健机构的传染病,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。POC装置主要用于城市卫生保健机构的非传染性疾病,特别是在高收入国家。结论:这项范围审查绘制了证据图,并突出了poct在初级保健中的应用差距。研究结果可用于设计和有效实施可持续的患者医疗保健旅程,以适应患者人口统计数据和医疗保健需求的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信