Abdulaziz Alrubayyi, Reza Fahimi, Muntaha Hassan, Jason Madan, Olalekan A. Uthman
{"title":"Current Clinical Practices and Future Perspectives for Primary Healthcare Use of Point-of-Care Devices: A Scoping Review","authors":"Abdulaziz Alrubayyi, Reza Fahimi, Muntaha Hassan, Jason Madan, Olalekan A. Uthman","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/4742851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Expanding access to screening through primary care is essential to address changes in disease patterns, patients’ needs, and demographics. Point-of-care test (POCT) devices play a crucial role in providing primary care and have positive operational and economic impacts compared to central laboratories. Despite their importance, the implementation of POCT devices in primary care remains low. This scoping review aims to map the current evidence on POCT types and their current uses in primary care.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A scoping review was conducted using the framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley, and further refined by Levac et al. and the Joanna Briggs Institute. Our process included five stages: identifying the research question, identifying relevant studies, study selection, charting the data, and collating, summarizing, and reporting the results. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for studies published between 2018 and 2023 on the use of POCTs in primary care settings for adult populations. Our findings were summarized using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> The search yielded 43,913 publications, of which, 167 met the inclusion criteria. From these studies, biomarker detection tests were used in 33.5%, antibody tests in 21.6%, other POCTs in 17.4%, POC technologies in 11.4%, antigen tests in 8.4%, and POC molecular tests in 7.8%. Across studies, 46.7% targeted communicable diseases, 39.5% targeted noncommunicable diseases, and 13.8% for other diseases. POC devices are mainly used for communicable diseases in urban healthcare settings, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). POC devices are used primarily for noncommunicable diseases in urban healthcare settings, particularly in high-income countries.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> This scoping review has mapped the evidence and highlighted gaps regarding POCTs used in primary care. The findings can be used to design and effectively implement sustainable patients’ healthcare journeys to accommodate the changes in patients’ demographics and healthcare needs.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/4742851","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/4742851","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Expanding access to screening through primary care is essential to address changes in disease patterns, patients’ needs, and demographics. Point-of-care test (POCT) devices play a crucial role in providing primary care and have positive operational and economic impacts compared to central laboratories. Despite their importance, the implementation of POCT devices in primary care remains low. This scoping review aims to map the current evidence on POCT types and their current uses in primary care.
Methods: A scoping review was conducted using the framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley, and further refined by Levac et al. and the Joanna Briggs Institute. Our process included five stages: identifying the research question, identifying relevant studies, study selection, charting the data, and collating, summarizing, and reporting the results. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for studies published between 2018 and 2023 on the use of POCTs in primary care settings for adult populations. Our findings were summarized using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.
Results: The search yielded 43,913 publications, of which, 167 met the inclusion criteria. From these studies, biomarker detection tests were used in 33.5%, antibody tests in 21.6%, other POCTs in 17.4%, POC technologies in 11.4%, antigen tests in 8.4%, and POC molecular tests in 7.8%. Across studies, 46.7% targeted communicable diseases, 39.5% targeted noncommunicable diseases, and 13.8% for other diseases. POC devices are mainly used for communicable diseases in urban healthcare settings, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). POC devices are used primarily for noncommunicable diseases in urban healthcare settings, particularly in high-income countries.
Conclusion: This scoping review has mapped the evidence and highlighted gaps regarding POCTs used in primary care. The findings can be used to design and effectively implement sustainable patients’ healthcare journeys to accommodate the changes in patients’ demographics and healthcare needs.
期刊介绍:
IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal.
IJCP publishes:
Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed]
Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
International scope
IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.