A geological, geochemical and isotopic study of primary diamond deposits in the Siberian craton

IF 1.4 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Sergey I. Kostrovitsky, Dmitry A. Yakovlev, Benjamin R. Fosu, Sergey I. Dril, Konstantin V. Garanin
{"title":"A geological, geochemical and isotopic study of primary diamond deposits in the Siberian craton","authors":"Sergey I. Kostrovitsky,&nbsp;Dmitry A. Yakovlev,&nbsp;Benjamin R. Fosu,&nbsp;Sergey I. Dril,&nbsp;Konstantin V. Garanin","doi":"10.1007/s00710-024-00880-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We present an overview of published and newly obtained data, which provides general information about the diamond deposits, geochemical and isotopic of kimberlites from all primary diamond deposits of the Siberian craton (20 kimberlite pipes). These deposits are predominantly composed of pyroclastic kimberlites, typically forming as complex, multi-phase, and multi-channel intrusions. Age determinations, based on U-Pb dating of zircon and perovskite, place these deposits between 370 and 350 Ma. A discernible south-to-north gradation in diamond grade across the Siberian craton, particularly in the Yakutian Province correlates with variations in the chemical composition of the kimberlites. The richest diamondiferous deposits are predominantly high-Mg kimberlites. Strikingly, some of the largest deposits by size (such as Jubileynaya, Zarnitsa, and Mir) are Mg-Fe kimberlites and are noted for their lower proportions of high-quality diamonds. Pyroclastic kimberlites, which constitute most Siberian primary diamond deposits generally have higher diamond grades than coherent kimberlites.Apart from the Nakyn field, the distribution of incompatible elements within Siberian diamondiferous kimberlites appears to be independent of their MgO, total FeO, and TiO<sub>2</sub> content. The kimberlites exhibit ɛNd values ranging from + 1.9 to + 7.0 and initial <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr ratios (denoted as <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr<sub>i</sub>) from 0.702 to 0.706 (except for the Nakyn field deposits), suggesting a provenance from a slightly depleted mantle source, akin to the prevalent mantle. The kimberlites of the Nakyn field deposits differ from other Siberian diamond deposits by an abnormally low content of incompatible elements, higher <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr<sub>i</sub> (0.706 to 0.710), and low ɛNd (-3.1 to + 2; Kononova et al. 2005). It is assumed that the kimberlites of the Nakyn field were derived from a mantle source, with an intermediate composition between prevalent mantle and enriched mantle I.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18547,"journal":{"name":"Mineralogy and Petrology","volume":"119 1","pages":"21 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mineralogy and Petrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00710-024-00880-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present an overview of published and newly obtained data, which provides general information about the diamond deposits, geochemical and isotopic of kimberlites from all primary diamond deposits of the Siberian craton (20 kimberlite pipes). These deposits are predominantly composed of pyroclastic kimberlites, typically forming as complex, multi-phase, and multi-channel intrusions. Age determinations, based on U-Pb dating of zircon and perovskite, place these deposits between 370 and 350 Ma. A discernible south-to-north gradation in diamond grade across the Siberian craton, particularly in the Yakutian Province correlates with variations in the chemical composition of the kimberlites. The richest diamondiferous deposits are predominantly high-Mg kimberlites. Strikingly, some of the largest deposits by size (such as Jubileynaya, Zarnitsa, and Mir) are Mg-Fe kimberlites and are noted for their lower proportions of high-quality diamonds. Pyroclastic kimberlites, which constitute most Siberian primary diamond deposits generally have higher diamond grades than coherent kimberlites.Apart from the Nakyn field, the distribution of incompatible elements within Siberian diamondiferous kimberlites appears to be independent of their MgO, total FeO, and TiO2 content. The kimberlites exhibit ɛNd values ranging from + 1.9 to + 7.0 and initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios (denoted as 87Sr/86Sri) from 0.702 to 0.706 (except for the Nakyn field deposits), suggesting a provenance from a slightly depleted mantle source, akin to the prevalent mantle. The kimberlites of the Nakyn field deposits differ from other Siberian diamond deposits by an abnormally low content of incompatible elements, higher 87Sr/86Sri (0.706 to 0.710), and low ɛNd (-3.1 to + 2; Kononova et al. 2005). It is assumed that the kimberlites of the Nakyn field were derived from a mantle source, with an intermediate composition between prevalent mantle and enriched mantle I.

西伯利亚克拉通原生金刚石矿床的地质、地球化学和同位素研究
本文综述了西伯利亚克拉通所有原生钻石矿床(20个金伯利岩管)的钻石矿床、金伯利岩的地球化学和同位素特征。这些矿床主要由火山碎屑金伯利岩组成,典型的形成是复杂的、多阶段的、多通道的侵入体。根据锆石和钙钛矿的U-Pb年代测定,这些矿床的年龄在370至350 Ma之间。在整个西伯利亚克拉通,特别是在雅库特省,钻石品位有明显的从南到北的渐变,这与金伯利岩化学成分的变化有关。含金刚石最丰富的矿床以高镁金伯利岩为主。引人注目的是,一些规模最大的矿床(如Jubileynaya、Zarnitsa和Mir)是镁铁金伯利岩,以其高质量钻石的比例较低而闻名。火山碎屑金伯利岩构成了大多数西伯利亚原生金刚石矿床,其金刚石品位通常高于相干金伯利岩。除Nakyn外,西伯利亚含金刚石金伯利岩中不相容元素的分布似乎与MgO、总FeO和TiO2含量无关。金伯利岩的Nd值为+ 1.9 ~ + 7.0,初始87Sr/86Sr比值(用87Sr/86Sri表示)为0.702 ~ 0.706 (Nakyn矿床除外),表明物源与地幔相似,属于稍衰竭的地幔源。纳金矿区金伯利岩的不相容元素含量异常低,87Sr/86Sri高(0.706 ~ 0.710),Nd低(-3.1 ~ + 2);Kononova et al. 2005)。认为纳金矿区的金伯利岩来源于地幔,其成分介于主地幔和富地幔I之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mineralogy and Petrology
Mineralogy and Petrology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Mineralogy and Petrology welcomes manuscripts from the classical fields of mineralogy, igneous and metamorphic petrology, geochemistry, crystallography, as well as their applications in academic experimentation and research, materials science and engineering, for technology, industry, environment, or society. The journal strongly promotes cross-fertilization among Earth-scientific and applied materials-oriented disciplines. Purely descriptive manuscripts on regional topics will not be considered. Mineralogy and Petrology was founded in 1872 by Gustav Tschermak as "Mineralogische und Petrographische Mittheilungen". It is one of Europe''s oldest geoscience journals. Former editors include outstanding names such as Gustav Tschermak, Friedrich Becke, Felix Machatschki, Josef Zemann, and Eugen F. Stumpfl.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信