Zhenguo Lin , Michael J. Seiler , Ralph B. Siebert (Professor of Economics) , Daniel T. Winkler (Professor of Finance and Real Estate)
{"title":"Selling price, time on the market, and contractual contingencies","authors":"Zhenguo Lin , Michael J. Seiler , Ralph B. Siebert (Professor of Economics) , Daniel T. Winkler (Professor of Finance and Real Estate)","doi":"10.1016/j.jhe.2025.102062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Real estate contracts often have a wide variety of contractual contingencies. This study examines whether a property inspection clause, the sale of other property contingency clause, and a backup offer contract affect a property's time on the market and selling price. A theoretical model is created based on the relative bargaining power between the buyer and seller. Using a large sample of transactions from Miami-Dade County in South Florida, we find that contingency clauses are significantly affected by market conditions, time on the market, list price premiums, brokerage characteristics, home size, and age. The time on the market (TOM) for purchase contracts with a property (pending) inspection clause or a backup offer contract is shorter. In contrast, the TOM for a sale of other property clause is longer. When holding constant TOM, buyers pay less for properties with a property inspection clause. In comparison, sellers receive a premium for properties with a sale of other property contingency clause. A backup offer contract has no effect on the selling price.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing Economics","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 102062"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Housing Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105113772500021X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Real estate contracts often have a wide variety of contractual contingencies. This study examines whether a property inspection clause, the sale of other property contingency clause, and a backup offer contract affect a property's time on the market and selling price. A theoretical model is created based on the relative bargaining power between the buyer and seller. Using a large sample of transactions from Miami-Dade County in South Florida, we find that contingency clauses are significantly affected by market conditions, time on the market, list price premiums, brokerage characteristics, home size, and age. The time on the market (TOM) for purchase contracts with a property (pending) inspection clause or a backup offer contract is shorter. In contrast, the TOM for a sale of other property clause is longer. When holding constant TOM, buyers pay less for properties with a property inspection clause. In comparison, sellers receive a premium for properties with a sale of other property contingency clause. A backup offer contract has no effect on the selling price.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Housing Economics provides a focal point for the publication of economic research related to housing and encourages papers that bring to bear careful analytical technique on important housing-related questions. The journal covers the broad spectrum of topics and approaches that constitute housing economics, including analysis of important public policy issues.