Techno-economic analysis of integrated PV/Biogas/Wind/Hydrogen polygeneration energy systems for green transportation in Bangladesh context

IF 4.2 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Shemanto Saha , Abu Kowsar , Sumon Chandra Debnath , Kawsar Ahmed , Firoz Alam
{"title":"Techno-economic analysis of integrated PV/Biogas/Wind/Hydrogen polygeneration energy systems for green transportation in Bangladesh context","authors":"Shemanto Saha ,&nbsp;Abu Kowsar ,&nbsp;Sumon Chandra Debnath ,&nbsp;Kawsar Ahmed ,&nbsp;Firoz Alam","doi":"10.1016/j.ref.2025.100707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global transportation system is currently experiencing a notable shift towards the prominence of fully electric, hybrid, and hydrogen-fuelled vehicles to reduce the environmental consequences of fossil fuels. Developing countries, including Bangladesh, promote renewable energy-based power generation to foster the uptake of green transportation solutions. However, the implementation of such a solution poses significant economic, technical, and affordability challenges. This study explores the techno-economic viability of four potential options (Models): photovoltaic (PV), biogas, wind, and hydrogen energy within a net-metering scheme, an area not previously well explored for developing countries. The study findings reveal that Model 1 (PV/biogas) featuring electric vehicles (EVs) bears a cost of US$ 0.0141/km and demonstrates higher economic viability than the other three models. From an environmental standpoint, Model 3 (PV/biogas-powered hydrogen refuelling stations—HRFS) emerges as the optimal choice, characterised by a CO<sub>2</sub> emission of 1.83 g/km and the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) and hydrogen production (LCOH<sub>P</sub>) values of US$ 13.4 and US$ 8.93, respectively. A sensitivity analysis of the PEM electrolyser price and gasification ratio estimates the LCOHp at US$ 8.63 to US$ 9.90. Environmental evaluations show that Models 3 and 4 can reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from diesel, petrol, and CNG in Bangladesh’s transportation sector by approximately 99.5%. The study further reveals that EVs are deemed more economical than hydrogen fuel cell vehicles for green transportation for developing nations under the current cost structure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29780,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy Focus","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 100707"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy Focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755008425000298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global transportation system is currently experiencing a notable shift towards the prominence of fully electric, hybrid, and hydrogen-fuelled vehicles to reduce the environmental consequences of fossil fuels. Developing countries, including Bangladesh, promote renewable energy-based power generation to foster the uptake of green transportation solutions. However, the implementation of such a solution poses significant economic, technical, and affordability challenges. This study explores the techno-economic viability of four potential options (Models): photovoltaic (PV), biogas, wind, and hydrogen energy within a net-metering scheme, an area not previously well explored for developing countries. The study findings reveal that Model 1 (PV/biogas) featuring electric vehicles (EVs) bears a cost of US$ 0.0141/km and demonstrates higher economic viability than the other three models. From an environmental standpoint, Model 3 (PV/biogas-powered hydrogen refuelling stations—HRFS) emerges as the optimal choice, characterised by a CO2 emission of 1.83 g/km and the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) and hydrogen production (LCOHP) values of US$ 13.4 and US$ 8.93, respectively. A sensitivity analysis of the PEM electrolyser price and gasification ratio estimates the LCOHp at US$ 8.63 to US$ 9.90. Environmental evaluations show that Models 3 and 4 can reduce CO2 emissions from diesel, petrol, and CNG in Bangladesh’s transportation sector by approximately 99.5%. The study further reveals that EVs are deemed more economical than hydrogen fuel cell vehicles for green transportation for developing nations under the current cost structure.
孟加拉国绿色交通一体化光伏/沼气/风能/氢气多联产能源系统的技术经济分析
为了减少化石燃料对环境的影响,全球交通运输系统目前正经历着一个显著的转变,转向全电动、混合动力和氢燃料汽车。包括孟加拉国在内的发展中国家正在推动以可再生能源为基础的发电,以促进采用绿色交通解决方案。然而,这种解决方案的实现带来了重大的经济、技术和可负担性挑战。本研究探讨了四种潜在选择(模式)的技术经济可行性:光伏(PV)、沼气、风能和净计量方案中的氢能,这是发展中国家以前没有充分探索的领域。研究结果显示,采用电动汽车的模型1(光伏/沼气)的成本为0.0141美元/公里,比其他三种模型具有更高的经济可行性。从环境角度来看,Model 3(光伏/沼气动力加氢站- hrfs)成为最佳选择,其CO2排放量为1.83 g/km,氢气(LCOH)和氢气生产(LCOHP)的平准化成本分别为13.4美元和8.93美元。PEM电解槽价格和气化比率的敏感性分析估计LCOHp为8.63美元至9.90美元。环境评估显示,model3和model4可以将孟加拉国交通运输部门的柴油、汽油和CNG的二氧化碳排放量减少约99.5%。该研究进一步表明,在目前的成本结构下,电动汽车被认为比氢燃料电池汽车更适合发展中国家的绿色交通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable Energy Focus
Renewable Energy Focus Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信