Costs and benefits of temporal expectations on somatosensory perception and decision-making

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Ziliang Xiong , Xavier Job , Konstantina Kilteni
{"title":"Costs and benefits of temporal expectations on somatosensory perception and decision-making","authors":"Ziliang Xiong ,&nbsp;Xavier Job ,&nbsp;Konstantina Kilteni","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our perception is shaped by prior expectations, including those about the timing of our sensations. These temporal expectations can be formed by recognizing patterns in the onset of sensory inputs. However, in the somatosensory domain, it remains unclear how these expectations impact the speed and accuracy of somatosensory judgments, as previous research has yielded mixed results. Here, participants used auditory tones to anticipate the onset of forces applied to their fingers and discriminated their intensity compared to a reference force. Experiment 1 showed that participants had worse discrimination sensitivity and higher thresholds for expected versus unexpected forces. Experiment 2 replicated and extended these costs to include perceptual accuracy, even when comparing expected to expectation-free forces, and further revealed reaction time benefits. Drift-diffusion modelling suggested that expectations speeded non-decisional processes while simultaneously slowing somatosensory evidence accumulation. These findings demonstrate both costs and benefits of temporal expectations in somatosensory perception and decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"261 ","pages":"Article 106146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027725000861","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our perception is shaped by prior expectations, including those about the timing of our sensations. These temporal expectations can be formed by recognizing patterns in the onset of sensory inputs. However, in the somatosensory domain, it remains unclear how these expectations impact the speed and accuracy of somatosensory judgments, as previous research has yielded mixed results. Here, participants used auditory tones to anticipate the onset of forces applied to their fingers and discriminated their intensity compared to a reference force. Experiment 1 showed that participants had worse discrimination sensitivity and higher thresholds for expected versus unexpected forces. Experiment 2 replicated and extended these costs to include perceptual accuracy, even when comparing expected to expectation-free forces, and further revealed reaction time benefits. Drift-diffusion modelling suggested that expectations speeded non-decisional processes while simultaneously slowing somatosensory evidence accumulation. These findings demonstrate both costs and benefits of temporal expectations in somatosensory perception and decision-making.
时间预期对躯体感觉知觉和决策的成本和收益
我们的感知是由先前的预期塑造的,包括我们感觉的时间。这些暂时的期望可以通过在感官输入开始时识别模式来形成。然而,在体感领域,这些期望如何影响体感判断的速度和准确性仍然不清楚,因为之前的研究得出了不同的结果。在这里,参与者使用听觉音调来预测施加在他们手指上的力的开始,并与参考力相比区分它们的强度。实验1表明,被试对预期力和非预期力具有较差的区分敏感性和较高的阈值。实验2复制并扩展了这些成本,包括感知准确性,甚至在比较预期力和无预期力时也是如此,并进一步揭示了反应时间的好处。漂移-扩散模型表明,期望加速了非决策过程,同时减缓了体感证据的积累。这些发现证明了时间预期在体感知觉和决策中的成本和收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信