Investigating the self-explaining performance of visual guidance facilities in extra-long spiral tunnels based on drivers’ spatial perception and visual attention distribution

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Guanyang Xing , Yongfeng Ma , Shuyan Chen , Yaqian Xing , Qianqian Pang , Lu Gao
{"title":"Investigating the self-explaining performance of visual guidance facilities in extra-long spiral tunnels based on drivers’ spatial perception and visual attention distribution","authors":"Guanyang Xing ,&nbsp;Yongfeng Ma ,&nbsp;Shuyan Chen ,&nbsp;Yaqian Xing ,&nbsp;Qianqian Pang ,&nbsp;Lu Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Enhancing the weak visual reference system is crucial for improving drivers’ spatial perception in extra-long spiral tunnels, which require continuous turns and uphill/downhill maneuvers. Using the Midicun Tunnel as a prototype, we tested three common visual guidance facilities—horizontal stripes, retroreflective rings, and edge markers—by constructing scenarios with each facility individually and in combinations of these facilities. A comprehensive indicator framework was developed to assess the impact of these facilities on drivers’ spatial perception and attention distribution. The self-explaining performance of each facility was evaluated using the matter-element model combined with the entropy weight method. Additionally, drivers’ subjective acceptance of each facility was measured using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which offered insights into their internal expectations and cognitive state. The results reveal that drivers tend to drive close to the inside wall of the curve in the continuous curved section of a spiral tunnel. Installing edge markers improves the self-explaining performance of the tunnel’s horizontal right-of-way, increasing the distance between the vehicle and the tunnel wall. Installing the retroreflective ring guides drivers’ attention to the central area ahead, enhancing the longitudinal right-of-way. However, when used alone, it can lead to longer fixation durations and lower saccade frequencies, an issue that can be mitigated by combining them with other features. Comprehensive evaluations and subjective acceptance surveys indicate that scenarios with multiple facilities provide optimal self-explaining performance and best meet drivers’ psychological expectations. Among individual installations, edge markers are the most effective, followed by retroreflective rings, with horizontal stripes showing the weakest performance. Based on these findings, specific recommendations for optimizing visual guidance in spiral tunnels are provided, offering valuable insights for improving tunnel environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 108040"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525001265","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enhancing the weak visual reference system is crucial for improving drivers’ spatial perception in extra-long spiral tunnels, which require continuous turns and uphill/downhill maneuvers. Using the Midicun Tunnel as a prototype, we tested three common visual guidance facilities—horizontal stripes, retroreflective rings, and edge markers—by constructing scenarios with each facility individually and in combinations of these facilities. A comprehensive indicator framework was developed to assess the impact of these facilities on drivers’ spatial perception and attention distribution. The self-explaining performance of each facility was evaluated using the matter-element model combined with the entropy weight method. Additionally, drivers’ subjective acceptance of each facility was measured using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which offered insights into their internal expectations and cognitive state. The results reveal that drivers tend to drive close to the inside wall of the curve in the continuous curved section of a spiral tunnel. Installing edge markers improves the self-explaining performance of the tunnel’s horizontal right-of-way, increasing the distance between the vehicle and the tunnel wall. Installing the retroreflective ring guides drivers’ attention to the central area ahead, enhancing the longitudinal right-of-way. However, when used alone, it can lead to longer fixation durations and lower saccade frequencies, an issue that can be mitigated by combining them with other features. Comprehensive evaluations and subjective acceptance surveys indicate that scenarios with multiple facilities provide optimal self-explaining performance and best meet drivers’ psychological expectations. Among individual installations, edge markers are the most effective, followed by retroreflective rings, with horizontal stripes showing the weakest performance. Based on these findings, specific recommendations for optimizing visual guidance in spiral tunnels are provided, offering valuable insights for improving tunnel environments.
基于驾驶员空间感知和视觉注意力分布的超长螺旋隧道视觉引导设施自解释性能研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信