Assessing fracture toughness performance of adhesively bonded carbon fiber/epoxy composite joints accompanied by acoustic emission inspection: Effect of surface treatment methods

IF 4.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS
Halil Senol , Hasan Ulus , Ceren Yildirim , Abdulrahman Al-Nadhari , Serra Topal , Mehmet Yildiz
{"title":"Assessing fracture toughness performance of adhesively bonded carbon fiber/epoxy composite joints accompanied by acoustic emission inspection: Effect of surface treatment methods","authors":"Halil Senol ,&nbsp;Hasan Ulus ,&nbsp;Ceren Yildirim ,&nbsp;Abdulrahman Al-Nadhari ,&nbsp;Serra Topal ,&nbsp;Mehmet Yildiz","doi":"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.111119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the impact of mechanical abrasion (MA), atmospheric pressure plasma activation (APA), and peel-ply (PP) treatments on the fracture toughness, damage mechanisms and damage progression of adhesively bonded carbon-fiber (CF)/epoxy composite joints. The chemical and physical properties of treatment applied adherend surfaces are examined through various methods. Double cantilever beam (DCB) and end-notched flexure (ENF) tests are conducted to evaluate the fracture toughness of joints. The acoustic emission (AE) method is employed during DCB and ENF tests to evaluate damage mechanisms and damage progression within specimens. The results demonstrate that MA treatment provides the highest fracture toughness, with mode-I (G<sub>IC</sub>) and mode-II (G<sub>IIC</sub>) toughness values increasing by 59% and 43%, respectively, compared to untreated specimens. APA-treated specimens show improved G<sub>IC</sub> and G<sub>IIC</sub> values by 27% and 30%, respectively, which is attributed to enhanced surface energy and chemical functionality. PP treatment contributes to a 20% increase in G<sub>IC</sub> and a 14% rise in G<sub>IIC</sub> due to improved surface roughness and surface energy. The findings highlight that the mechanical interlocking effect induced by MA treatment significantly strengthens the bond, while surface chemistry modifications achieved through APA treatment benefit bonding in applications where material integrity is critical. AE analysis reveals distinct damage mechanisms associated with each surface treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11576,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","volume":"321 ","pages":"Article 111119"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794425003200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of mechanical abrasion (MA), atmospheric pressure plasma activation (APA), and peel-ply (PP) treatments on the fracture toughness, damage mechanisms and damage progression of adhesively bonded carbon-fiber (CF)/epoxy composite joints. The chemical and physical properties of treatment applied adherend surfaces are examined through various methods. Double cantilever beam (DCB) and end-notched flexure (ENF) tests are conducted to evaluate the fracture toughness of joints. The acoustic emission (AE) method is employed during DCB and ENF tests to evaluate damage mechanisms and damage progression within specimens. The results demonstrate that MA treatment provides the highest fracture toughness, with mode-I (GIC) and mode-II (GIIC) toughness values increasing by 59% and 43%, respectively, compared to untreated specimens. APA-treated specimens show improved GIC and GIIC values by 27% and 30%, respectively, which is attributed to enhanced surface energy and chemical functionality. PP treatment contributes to a 20% increase in GIC and a 14% rise in GIIC due to improved surface roughness and surface energy. The findings highlight that the mechanical interlocking effect induced by MA treatment significantly strengthens the bond, while surface chemistry modifications achieved through APA treatment benefit bonding in applications where material integrity is critical. AE analysis reveals distinct damage mechanisms associated with each surface treatment.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
606
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: EFM covers a broad range of topics in fracture mechanics to be of interest and use to both researchers and practitioners. Contributions are welcome which address the fracture behavior of conventional engineering material systems as well as newly emerging material systems. Contributions on developments in the areas of mechanics and materials science strongly related to fracture mechanics are also welcome. Papers on fatigue are welcome if they treat the fatigue process using the methods of fracture mechanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信