Anna de Visser Amundson, Joost de Vos, Robert Gallicano
{"title":"Go with the flow: How changing the default can drive consumer choice for climate friendly menu options","authors":"Anna de Visser Amundson, Joost de Vos, Robert Gallicano","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Restaurant customers typically select from pre-set menu options, as requesting alternatives requires additional cognitive and emotional effort. ‘Going with the flow’ is easier and often sufficient to meet perceived consumption goals (e.g., having a nice meal in a restaurant). This paper shows how restaurants can change the default option as a strategy to nudge customers toward more climate friendly choices. Specifically, we demonstrate, in a buffet restaurant field context, that setting a vegetarian option as the default (requiring customers to request the meat option) more than doubles the sales of the vegetarian option relative to the meat default condition. While these results build on previous research in a novel context, we also provide new insights into the default nudge, revealing a potential drawback of its effect. We find that changing the default can also divert customers from the focal product category and cause a significant decrease, 30.1 %, in overall sales at those buffet stations. However, customer satisfaction levels remain consistent across both conditions, suggesting that the drop in sales is not due to dissatisfaction with the vegetarian default but rather reflects the ease of choosing alternatives at other buffet stations. These findings offer a more nuanced perspective that, while changing the default can effectively encourage more climate friendly menu choices, it should be carefully designed to prevent potential business losses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 105546"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325001211","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Restaurant customers typically select from pre-set menu options, as requesting alternatives requires additional cognitive and emotional effort. ‘Going with the flow’ is easier and often sufficient to meet perceived consumption goals (e.g., having a nice meal in a restaurant). This paper shows how restaurants can change the default option as a strategy to nudge customers toward more climate friendly choices. Specifically, we demonstrate, in a buffet restaurant field context, that setting a vegetarian option as the default (requiring customers to request the meat option) more than doubles the sales of the vegetarian option relative to the meat default condition. While these results build on previous research in a novel context, we also provide new insights into the default nudge, revealing a potential drawback of its effect. We find that changing the default can also divert customers from the focal product category and cause a significant decrease, 30.1 %, in overall sales at those buffet stations. However, customer satisfaction levels remain consistent across both conditions, suggesting that the drop in sales is not due to dissatisfaction with the vegetarian default but rather reflects the ease of choosing alternatives at other buffet stations. These findings offer a more nuanced perspective that, while changing the default can effectively encourage more climate friendly menu choices, it should be carefully designed to prevent potential business losses.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.