Decision Readiness and Determinants of Kidney Replacement Therapy among Veterans with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kailyn E Pearce,Yi Guo,Shobha Subhash,Darin Ftouni,Brian Visconti,Anuradha Wadhwa,Adhish Agarwal,Huanguang Jia,Ashutosh M Shukla
{"title":"Decision Readiness and Determinants of Kidney Replacement Therapy among Veterans with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.","authors":"Kailyn E Pearce,Yi Guo,Shobha Subhash,Darin Ftouni,Brian Visconti,Anuradha Wadhwa,Adhish Agarwal,Huanguang Jia,Ashutosh M Shukla","doi":"10.2215/cjn.0000000713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nKidney disease stakeholders recommend a system-wide increase in home dialysis use. Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) decision readiness is associated with higher selection and use of home dialysis; however, KRT decision-making is complex, and factors informing KRT decision readiness in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) are unclear.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nUsing the baseline data of the Trial to Evaluate and Assess the effects of Comprehensive KRT-directed patient education on Home dialysis use among VETerans (TEACH-VET), we conducted a cross-sectional analysis to evaluate prevalent KRT decision readiness, defined as ability to choose any KRT modality among US Veterans with advanced CKD. We also evaluated Veterans' ability to achieve high-quality informed KRT decisions (more than 60% decisional confidence on a scale ranging from 1 to 100%) and selection of home dialysis as secondary outcomes. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to test associations between patient-level variables and outcomes.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf the 468 enrollees with a complete baseline dataset, 282 (60%) could not pick any KRT modality; the rest were split between high (20%) vs. low-quality (20%) decisions and home (21%) vs. in-center (19%) dialysis. Younger age, higher CKD stage, history of receiving prior KRT-directed education, rural habitation, and objective disease knowledge were positively associated with KRT decision readiness. Only objective disease knowledge was associated with KRT decision readiness after adjustments, with participants in the highest tertile of CKD-specific knowledge having two-fold (OR: 2.31, 95%CI: 1.18, 4.55) and KRT-specific knowledge having five-fold (OR: 5.16, 95%CI: 2.63, 10.32) higher odds of selecting their KRT. Item-level analysis showed that difficult, specifically KRT knowledge-related, items had a high discriminatory capacity to predict KRT decision readiness.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nVeterans with advanced CKD are ill-prepared for KRT decision-making. While social determinants of health have a potential role in identifying high-risk populations, objective kidney failure and KRT-specific knowledge have a dominant impact on KRT decision readiness.","PeriodicalId":50681,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.0000000713","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Kidney disease stakeholders recommend a system-wide increase in home dialysis use. Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) decision readiness is associated with higher selection and use of home dialysis; however, KRT decision-making is complex, and factors informing KRT decision readiness in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) are unclear. METHODS Using the baseline data of the Trial to Evaluate and Assess the effects of Comprehensive KRT-directed patient education on Home dialysis use among VETerans (TEACH-VET), we conducted a cross-sectional analysis to evaluate prevalent KRT decision readiness, defined as ability to choose any KRT modality among US Veterans with advanced CKD. We also evaluated Veterans' ability to achieve high-quality informed KRT decisions (more than 60% decisional confidence on a scale ranging from 1 to 100%) and selection of home dialysis as secondary outcomes. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to test associations between patient-level variables and outcomes. RESULTS Of the 468 enrollees with a complete baseline dataset, 282 (60%) could not pick any KRT modality; the rest were split between high (20%) vs. low-quality (20%) decisions and home (21%) vs. in-center (19%) dialysis. Younger age, higher CKD stage, history of receiving prior KRT-directed education, rural habitation, and objective disease knowledge were positively associated with KRT decision readiness. Only objective disease knowledge was associated with KRT decision readiness after adjustments, with participants in the highest tertile of CKD-specific knowledge having two-fold (OR: 2.31, 95%CI: 1.18, 4.55) and KRT-specific knowledge having five-fold (OR: 5.16, 95%CI: 2.63, 10.32) higher odds of selecting their KRT. Item-level analysis showed that difficult, specifically KRT knowledge-related, items had a high discriminatory capacity to predict KRT decision readiness. CONCLUSION Veterans with advanced CKD are ill-prepared for KRT decision-making. While social determinants of health have a potential role in identifying high-risk populations, objective kidney failure and KRT-specific knowledge have a dominant impact on KRT decision readiness.
患有晚期慢性肾病的退伍军人接受肾脏替代疗法的决策准备情况和决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology strives to establish itself as the foremost authority in communicating and influencing advances in clinical nephrology by (1) swiftly and effectively disseminating pivotal developments in clinical and translational research in nephrology, encompassing innovations in research methods and care delivery; (2) providing context for these advances in relation to future research directions and patient care; and (3) becoming a key voice on issues with potential implications for the clinical practice of nephrology, particularly within the United States. Original manuscript topics cover a range of areas, including Acid/Base and Electrolyte Disorders, Acute Kidney Injury and ICU Nephrology, Chronic Kidney Disease, Clinical Nephrology, Cystic Kidney Disease, Diabetes and the Kidney, Genetics, Geriatric and Palliative Nephrology, Glomerular and Tubulointerstitial Diseases, Hypertension, Maintenance Dialysis, Mineral Metabolism, Nephrolithiasis, and Transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信