R. Molina , Y. Crespo , J.R. Árbol , A.V. Arias-Orduña , A.J. Ibáñez-Molina , S. Iglesias-Parro
{"title":"Exploring the neurophysiological basis of misinformation: A behavioral and neural complexity analysis","authors":"R. Molina , Y. Crespo , J.R. Árbol , A.V. Arias-Orduña , A.J. Ibáñez-Molina , S. Iglesias-Parro","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The proliferation of misinformation on social media platforms poses significant challenges to public health, political discourse, and social cohesion. This study investigates the efficacy of a World Health Organization (WHO) infodemic intervention in mitigating the spread of misinformation and explores the underlying neural mechanisms involved in information processing. A sample of 77 university students was randomly assigned to an experimental group, which was exposed to the WHO's infodemic intervention, or a control group, which received a campaign on healthy lifestyle habits. Participants viewed a series of manipulated and non-manipulated tweets before and after the intervention, rating their likelihood to share, verify, and perceive the truthfulness of the information. Electroencephalogram (EEG) data were collected throughout the experiment to assess neural complexity using Sample Entropy (SampEn) measures. Results revealed that the experimental group significantly reduced their intention to share information and perceived truthfulness of both manipulated and non-manipulated items post-intervention. The control group showed no significant changes. EEG analysis demonstrated higher SampEn scores in the frontal and temporal regions for the experimental group post-intervention, indicating increased neural complexity and more homogeneous activation patterns. These findings suggest that the WHO intervention effectively enhanced participants' critical evaluation of information, reflected in both behavioral and neurophysiological changes. This study contributes to the growing body of research on misinformation interventions by providing evidence for the effectiveness of passive, less demanding campaigns in fostering critical thinking and information discernment. Moreover, it offers novel insights into the neural correlates of information processing following such interventions, highlighting the potential of combining behavioral and neurophysiological measures in misinformation research. These findings have important implications for developing targeted strategies to combat misinformation, enhance digital literacy, and inform future public health and policy initiatives in the digital era.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":"487 ","pages":"Article 115592"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432825001780","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The proliferation of misinformation on social media platforms poses significant challenges to public health, political discourse, and social cohesion. This study investigates the efficacy of a World Health Organization (WHO) infodemic intervention in mitigating the spread of misinformation and explores the underlying neural mechanisms involved in information processing. A sample of 77 university students was randomly assigned to an experimental group, which was exposed to the WHO's infodemic intervention, or a control group, which received a campaign on healthy lifestyle habits. Participants viewed a series of manipulated and non-manipulated tweets before and after the intervention, rating their likelihood to share, verify, and perceive the truthfulness of the information. Electroencephalogram (EEG) data were collected throughout the experiment to assess neural complexity using Sample Entropy (SampEn) measures. Results revealed that the experimental group significantly reduced their intention to share information and perceived truthfulness of both manipulated and non-manipulated items post-intervention. The control group showed no significant changes. EEG analysis demonstrated higher SampEn scores in the frontal and temporal regions for the experimental group post-intervention, indicating increased neural complexity and more homogeneous activation patterns. These findings suggest that the WHO intervention effectively enhanced participants' critical evaluation of information, reflected in both behavioral and neurophysiological changes. This study contributes to the growing body of research on misinformation interventions by providing evidence for the effectiveness of passive, less demanding campaigns in fostering critical thinking and information discernment. Moreover, it offers novel insights into the neural correlates of information processing following such interventions, highlighting the potential of combining behavioral and neurophysiological measures in misinformation research. These findings have important implications for developing targeted strategies to combat misinformation, enhance digital literacy, and inform future public health and policy initiatives in the digital era.
期刊介绍:
Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.