Analysing disparities between household food waste metrics and their socioeconomic drivers in Chamwino District, Tanzania

Denis M. Silayo, Abiud J. Bongole, Mary Kulwijila
{"title":"Analysing disparities between household food waste metrics and their socioeconomic drivers in Chamwino District, Tanzania","authors":"Denis M. Silayo,&nbsp;Abiud J. Bongole,&nbsp;Mary Kulwijila","doi":"10.1016/j.wmb.2025.100206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Food waste measurement has garnered significant attention in recent years due to its critical role in devising interventions to mitigate the environmental, social, and economic impacts of food waste. However, the absence of a standardized protocol for Food Waste (FdW) quantification remains a key obstacle in formulating and evaluating effective minimization strategies. This study utilizes Bland-Altman plots and regression analysis to evaluate the agreement between Self-Reported Food Waste (SR<sub>FW</sub>) and Direct Weighing Food Waste (DW<sub>FW</sub>) in a sample of 402 randomly selected households in Chamwino District, Tanzania. It also investigates the socioeconomic factors influencing disparities between these measurement methods, providing valuable insights into the drivers of these discrepancies. The findings reveal a bias of 0.100067 Kilogram (kg), indicating that SR<sub>FW</sub> measurements significantly underestimate household FdW. On average, respondents report edible FdW of 0.032703 kg through SR<sub>FW</sub>, while DW<sub>FW</sub> measures 0.132769 kg. Furthermore, gender, age, marital status, house ownership, awareness, and price and cost sensitivity are identified as significant factors influencing the bias between the two methods. The study concludes by advocating for increased awareness creation, the combined use of SR<sub>FW</sub> and DW<sub>FW</sub> methods, and measures to foster household accountability. These recommendations aim to enhance the accuracy of FdW quantification and support the development of effective waste reduction strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101276,"journal":{"name":"Waste Management Bulletin","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste Management Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949750725000355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food waste measurement has garnered significant attention in recent years due to its critical role in devising interventions to mitigate the environmental, social, and economic impacts of food waste. However, the absence of a standardized protocol for Food Waste (FdW) quantification remains a key obstacle in formulating and evaluating effective minimization strategies. This study utilizes Bland-Altman plots and regression analysis to evaluate the agreement between Self-Reported Food Waste (SRFW) and Direct Weighing Food Waste (DWFW) in a sample of 402 randomly selected households in Chamwino District, Tanzania. It also investigates the socioeconomic factors influencing disparities between these measurement methods, providing valuable insights into the drivers of these discrepancies. The findings reveal a bias of 0.100067 Kilogram (kg), indicating that SRFW measurements significantly underestimate household FdW. On average, respondents report edible FdW of 0.032703 kg through SRFW, while DWFW measures 0.132769 kg. Furthermore, gender, age, marital status, house ownership, awareness, and price and cost sensitivity are identified as significant factors influencing the bias between the two methods. The study concludes by advocating for increased awareness creation, the combined use of SRFW and DWFW methods, and measures to foster household accountability. These recommendations aim to enhance the accuracy of FdW quantification and support the development of effective waste reduction strategies.
分析坦桑尼亚Chamwino地区家庭食物浪费指标及其社会经济驱动因素之间的差异
近年来,由于在设计干预措施以减轻食物浪费对环境、社会和经济的影响方面发挥了关键作用,食物浪费测量引起了极大的关注。然而,缺乏食物浪费量化的标准化方案仍然是制定和评估有效的最小化战略的主要障碍。本研究利用Bland-Altman图和回归分析来评估坦桑尼亚Chamwino地区402个随机抽取的家庭样本中自我报告食物浪费(SRFW)和直接称重食物浪费(DWFW)之间的一致性。它还调查了影响这些测量方法之间差异的社会经济因素,为这些差异的驱动因素提供了有价值的见解。研究结果显示偏差为0.100067 kg (kg),表明SRFW测量显著低估了家庭FdW。平均而言,受访者通过SRFW报告的可食用FdW为0.032703 kg,而DWFW的测量为0.132769 kg。此外,性别、年龄、婚姻状况、房屋所有权、意识以及价格和成本敏感性被认为是影响两种方法偏差的重要因素。该研究的结论是提倡提高认识,结合使用家庭贫困妇女和家庭贫困妇女的方法,并采取措施促进家庭问责制。这些建议旨在提高外置废物量化的准确性,并支持制定有效的减少废物策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信