What is the best sampling region for endocrine hair analysis? A comparison between the posterior vertex and occipital region and recommendation for standardization
Katharina Huthsteiner , Johannes B. Finke , Eva M.J. Peters , Kristian Kleinke , Tim Klucken , Tobias Stalder
{"title":"What is the best sampling region for endocrine hair analysis? A comparison between the posterior vertex and occipital region and recommendation for standardization","authors":"Katharina Huthsteiner , Johannes B. Finke , Eva M.J. Peters , Kristian Kleinke , Tim Klucken , Tobias Stalder","doi":"10.1016/j.psyneuen.2025.107457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hair analysis is increasingly used to index long-term cumulative hormone levels. However, it remains unclear from which scalp region hair should be sampled to yield best results. Here, we conduct an in-depth, systematic investigation into this question, comparing quality characteristics between the two most promising sampling areas, the posterior vertex and the occipital region. To advance standardization in future research, we specify anatomical landmarks to clearly define sampling regions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants (<em>N</em> = 53) provided a total of twelve hair samples across two time points, three months apart. At each time point, six hair samples (three from each region) were analyzed for concentrations of cortisol, cortisone, progesterone, dehydroepiandrosterone and endocannabinoids (AEA, 1/2-AG, OEA, SEA, PEA) via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Patterns of intra-region variability, mean differences, test-retest correlations and associations with external criteria (anthropometrics and perceived stress) were compared between regions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, no consistent differences were found between the posterior vertex and occipital region with regard to intra-region variability, test-retest correlations and external associations. However, significant mean differences in analyte concentrations were observed: hair cortisol and cortisone were higher in the occipital region, while OEA, SEA and PEA were higher at the posterior vertex.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings highlight the importance of sampling from a defined scalp region for endocrine hair analyses. While neither scalp region was unequivocally superior, differences in mean concentrations call for increased standardization of methodological practice in future research. We propose anatomical landmarks for precise region localization and offer practical recommendations concerning the choice of sampling region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20836,"journal":{"name":"Psychoneuroendocrinology","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 107457"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoneuroendocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306453025001805","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Hair analysis is increasingly used to index long-term cumulative hormone levels. However, it remains unclear from which scalp region hair should be sampled to yield best results. Here, we conduct an in-depth, systematic investigation into this question, comparing quality characteristics between the two most promising sampling areas, the posterior vertex and the occipital region. To advance standardization in future research, we specify anatomical landmarks to clearly define sampling regions.
Methods
Participants (N = 53) provided a total of twelve hair samples across two time points, three months apart. At each time point, six hair samples (three from each region) were analyzed for concentrations of cortisol, cortisone, progesterone, dehydroepiandrosterone and endocannabinoids (AEA, 1/2-AG, OEA, SEA, PEA) via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Patterns of intra-region variability, mean differences, test-retest correlations and associations with external criteria (anthropometrics and perceived stress) were compared between regions.
Results
Overall, no consistent differences were found between the posterior vertex and occipital region with regard to intra-region variability, test-retest correlations and external associations. However, significant mean differences in analyte concentrations were observed: hair cortisol and cortisone were higher in the occipital region, while OEA, SEA and PEA were higher at the posterior vertex.
Conclusions
Our findings highlight the importance of sampling from a defined scalp region for endocrine hair analyses. While neither scalp region was unequivocally superior, differences in mean concentrations call for increased standardization of methodological practice in future research. We propose anatomical landmarks for precise region localization and offer practical recommendations concerning the choice of sampling region.
期刊介绍:
Psychoneuroendocrinology publishes papers dealing with the interrelated disciplines of psychology, neurobiology, endocrinology, immunology, neurology, and psychiatry, with an emphasis on multidisciplinary studies aiming at integrating these disciplines in terms of either basic research or clinical implications. One of the main goals is to understand how a variety of psychobiological factors interact in the expression of the stress response as it relates to the development and/or maintenance of neuropsychiatric illnesses.