Sharon Koehn , C. Allyson Jones , Anh Pham , Claire E.H. Barber , Jessica Widdifield , Lisa Jasper , Douglas Klein , Neil Drummond
{"title":"Identifying the need for care in rheumatoid arthritis: A Candidacy 2.0 analysis of lived experiences","authors":"Sharon Koehn , C. Allyson Jones , Anh Pham , Claire E.H. Barber , Jessica Widdifield , Lisa Jasper , Douglas Klein , Neil Drummond","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores how individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) come to identify themselves as candidates for medical care, using the newly developed Candidacy 2.0 model. Candidacy 2.0 extends the original Candidacy Framework by emphasizing the role of the embodied intersectional relational self in healthcare access, providing a theoretical framework that transcends specific healthcare systems. Through semi-structured interviews with 33 individuals living with RA across six Canadian provinces, we examined how embodied experiences, social identities, and relational contexts shape initial recognition of care needs. Analysis revealed distinct 'tipping points' where symptom progression from single to multiple joints and unmanageable pain forced recognition of care needs. Age and gender identities created distinct barriers to care-seeking: younger individuals dismissed symptoms as affecting only older adults, while gendered expectations about caregiving delayed help-seeking among women. Professional identity emerged as particularly significant, offering knowledge advantages but sometimes hindering patient-centered care. Support networks proved crucial in symptom interpretation and help-seeking, with their importance highlighted by COVID-19-related disruptions. The study demonstrates how Candidacy 2.0's emphasis on embodied, intersectional, and relational aspects of healthcare access enhances understanding of help-seeking behaviors in chronic conditions. Findings suggest the need for targeted public health campaigns addressing age-related misconceptions, gender-sensitive clinical approaches, flexible care delivery models that accommodate support networks, and educational resources helping patients identify and act upon significant symptom changes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"374 ","pages":"Article 118040"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625003703","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explores how individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) come to identify themselves as candidates for medical care, using the newly developed Candidacy 2.0 model. Candidacy 2.0 extends the original Candidacy Framework by emphasizing the role of the embodied intersectional relational self in healthcare access, providing a theoretical framework that transcends specific healthcare systems. Through semi-structured interviews with 33 individuals living with RA across six Canadian provinces, we examined how embodied experiences, social identities, and relational contexts shape initial recognition of care needs. Analysis revealed distinct 'tipping points' where symptom progression from single to multiple joints and unmanageable pain forced recognition of care needs. Age and gender identities created distinct barriers to care-seeking: younger individuals dismissed symptoms as affecting only older adults, while gendered expectations about caregiving delayed help-seeking among women. Professional identity emerged as particularly significant, offering knowledge advantages but sometimes hindering patient-centered care. Support networks proved crucial in symptom interpretation and help-seeking, with their importance highlighted by COVID-19-related disruptions. The study demonstrates how Candidacy 2.0's emphasis on embodied, intersectional, and relational aspects of healthcare access enhances understanding of help-seeking behaviors in chronic conditions. Findings suggest the need for targeted public health campaigns addressing age-related misconceptions, gender-sensitive clinical approaches, flexible care delivery models that accommodate support networks, and educational resources helping patients identify and act upon significant symptom changes.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.