Academic community acceptance of recycled plastic products: An analysis of product evaluation and willingness to consume

Indah Widiastuti, Yahya Fuad Azzam, Dwi Novi Aldiyanto, Taufik Wisnu Saputra, Yuyun Estriyanto
{"title":"Academic community acceptance of recycled plastic products: An analysis of product evaluation and willingness to consume","authors":"Indah Widiastuti,&nbsp;Yahya Fuad Azzam,&nbsp;Dwi Novi Aldiyanto,&nbsp;Taufik Wisnu Saputra,&nbsp;Yuyun Estriyanto","doi":"10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Growing environmental concerns have increased the focus on sustainable practices, including using recycled plastic products. However, public perceptions regarding these products' quality and potential risks remain unclear. In the academic context, this study examines how individuals perceive and are willing to use recycled plastic products. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach was employed, integrating an experimental study and a survey, followed by a qualitative follow-up interview for deeper insight. A stratified random sampling method was utilized to ensure representation of the academic community in a public university in Indonesia, yielding 116 respondents from three study programs, including students, administrative staff, and faculty members. The findings indicated a generally positive perception of recycled plastic products within the academic community. Results from the Chi-Square test showed no significant differences in identification accuracy across different sensory channels for the three materials presented: virgin polypropylene, recycled polypropylene, and recycled disposable face masks, each manufactured into the same product. Regarding product appearance, most participants perceived recycled and non-recycled plastic products as having comparable quality (p &gt; .05). Regression analysis demonstrated that perceived benefit was a significant predictor of individuals’ willingness to consume recycled plastic products (β=.1562, p &lt; .05). In contrast, perceived risk had a negative effect ( β=-.1046, p &lt; .05). Interview findings highlighted specific concerns regarding products made from recycled face masks due to limited information on potential health risks. This study holds significant implications for promoting sustainable practices within academic institutions. The academic community can be a role model in fostering environmental sustainability by implementing policies encouraging recycled products.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100256,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Waste Systems","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Waste Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772912525000788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growing environmental concerns have increased the focus on sustainable practices, including using recycled plastic products. However, public perceptions regarding these products' quality and potential risks remain unclear. In the academic context, this study examines how individuals perceive and are willing to use recycled plastic products. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach was employed, integrating an experimental study and a survey, followed by a qualitative follow-up interview for deeper insight. A stratified random sampling method was utilized to ensure representation of the academic community in a public university in Indonesia, yielding 116 respondents from three study programs, including students, administrative staff, and faculty members. The findings indicated a generally positive perception of recycled plastic products within the academic community. Results from the Chi-Square test showed no significant differences in identification accuracy across different sensory channels for the three materials presented: virgin polypropylene, recycled polypropylene, and recycled disposable face masks, each manufactured into the same product. Regarding product appearance, most participants perceived recycled and non-recycled plastic products as having comparable quality (p > .05). Regression analysis demonstrated that perceived benefit was a significant predictor of individuals’ willingness to consume recycled plastic products (β=.1562, p < .05). In contrast, perceived risk had a negative effect ( β=-.1046, p < .05). Interview findings highlighted specific concerns regarding products made from recycled face masks due to limited information on potential health risks. This study holds significant implications for promoting sustainable practices within academic institutions. The academic community can be a role model in fostering environmental sustainability by implementing policies encouraging recycled products.
学术界对再生塑料产品的接受程度:产品评价与消费意愿分析
日益增长的环境问题使人们更加关注可持续的做法,包括使用再生塑料产品。然而,公众对这些产品的质量和潜在风险的看法仍不清楚。在学术背景下,本研究考察了个人如何看待和愿意使用再生塑料产品。采用顺序解释混合方法,结合实验研究和调查,然后进行定性随访访谈,以获得更深入的见解。为了确保印度尼西亚一所公立大学学术界的代表性,采用了分层随机抽样方法,从三个研究项目中获得了116名受访者,包括学生、行政人员和教职员工。研究结果表明,学术界普遍对再生塑料产品持积极态度。卡方检验的结果显示,在不同的感官通道上,对三种材料的识别准确率没有显著差异:原生聚丙烯、再生聚丙烯和再生一次性口罩,每种材料都被制成同一种产品。关于产品外观,大多数参与者认为回收和非回收塑料产品具有相当的质量(p >; .05)。回归分析表明,感知效益是个体消费再生塑料制品意愿的显著预测因子(β=。1562, p & lt; . 05)。相比之下,感知风险有负面影响(β=-)。1046, p & lt; . 05)。访谈结果强调,由于有关潜在健康风险的信息有限,人们对由回收口罩制成的产品特别关注。本研究对促进学术机构的可持续实践具有重要意义。通过实施鼓励回收产品的政策,学术界可以成为促进环境可持续性的榜样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信