E. Daniel Syrett , Carrie L. Peterson , Benjamin J. Darter
{"title":"The effect of step length alterations on intact limb medial tibiofemoral joint contact force in individuals with unilateral lower limb amputation","authors":"E. Daniel Syrett , Carrie L. Peterson , Benjamin J. Darter","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Individuals with lower limb amputation (LLA) frequently demonstrate intact limb knee osteoarthritis, likely from alterations in joint loading. Prior work suggests changes in step length (SL) may affect knee joint loading, however this has not been evaluated in this population. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effect of SL changes on intact limb medial compartment tibiofemoral joint contact force (mTJCF) in individuals with LLA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fourteen individuals with transtibial amputation walked at their self-selected velocity for three step length conditions: self-selected (SL<sub>SS</sub>), 15 % increased (SL<sub>I</sub>), and 15 % decreased (SL<sub>D</sub>). Ten gait cycles from each condition were analyzed using standard OpenSim procedures. Intact limb mTJCF 1st Peaks, 2nd Peaks, and Impulses were compared between conditions using linear mixed effects models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1st Peak was increased during SL<sub>I</sub> compared to SL<sub>SS</sub> (2.65 BW vs. 2.39 BW, p = 0.02). 2nd Peak was reduced during SL<sub>D</sub> compared to SL<sub>SS</sub> (2.61 BW vs. 2.94 BW, p < 0.01) and SL<sub>I</sub> (2.61 BW vs. 3.05 BW, p < 0.01). Impulse was different between all conditions (SL<sub>SS</sub>: 1.35 ± 0.29 BW-s, SL<sub>I</sub>: 1.61 ± 0.33 BW-s, SL<sub>D</sub>: 1.14 ± 0.35 BW-s, all p < 0.01). All other comparisons were non-significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Changes in SL altered intact limb mTJCF of individuals with LLA, though whether these changes are clinically meaningful is unknown. Clinicians should consider such effects when performing interventions that may alter SL.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"120 ","pages":"Pages 118-123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225001675","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Individuals with lower limb amputation (LLA) frequently demonstrate intact limb knee osteoarthritis, likely from alterations in joint loading. Prior work suggests changes in step length (SL) may affect knee joint loading, however this has not been evaluated in this population. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effect of SL changes on intact limb medial compartment tibiofemoral joint contact force (mTJCF) in individuals with LLA.
Methods
Fourteen individuals with transtibial amputation walked at their self-selected velocity for three step length conditions: self-selected (SLSS), 15 % increased (SLI), and 15 % decreased (SLD). Ten gait cycles from each condition were analyzed using standard OpenSim procedures. Intact limb mTJCF 1st Peaks, 2nd Peaks, and Impulses were compared between conditions using linear mixed effects models.
Results
1st Peak was increased during SLI compared to SLSS (2.65 BW vs. 2.39 BW, p = 0.02). 2nd Peak was reduced during SLD compared to SLSS (2.61 BW vs. 2.94 BW, p < 0.01) and SLI (2.61 BW vs. 3.05 BW, p < 0.01). Impulse was different between all conditions (SLSS: 1.35 ± 0.29 BW-s, SLI: 1.61 ± 0.33 BW-s, SLD: 1.14 ± 0.35 BW-s, all p < 0.01). All other comparisons were non-significant.
Conclusion
Changes in SL altered intact limb mTJCF of individuals with LLA, though whether these changes are clinically meaningful is unknown. Clinicians should consider such effects when performing interventions that may alter SL.
期刊介绍:
Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance.
The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.