Identifying supply–demand mismatches of ecosystem services and social-ecological drivers at different scales to support land use planning

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Fan Tian, Xueping Li, Xue Wu, Lu Gong
{"title":"Identifying supply–demand mismatches of ecosystem services and social-ecological drivers at different scales to support land use planning","authors":"Fan Tian,&nbsp;Xueping Li,&nbsp;Xue Wu,&nbsp;Lu Gong","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Integrating ecosystem services (ESs) into spatial planning remains a topical research area in land system science. However, the application of spatial–temporal and cross-scale knowledge on ESs supply and demand in management practice is underrepresented. This study attempted to examine the spatial patterns and interactions of five ESs supply–demand dynamics and reveal their responses to social-ecological drivers to propose optimization strategies for sustainable land management at different scales. We mapped the supply and demand of ESs in the economic belt on the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains (EBNSTM). We identified the interactions and drivers of ecological supply and demand ratios (ESDRs), established zones based on bundles of supply–demand relationships of ESs (BSDRESs) for spatial planning and discussed the scale effects. Our findings indicated the worsening imbalance of supply–demand relationships of ESs. The trade-offs were only observed at the smaller scale and specifically between food provision (FP) and the other ESs. With the change of scale, the composition of BSDRESs had been reconfigured. Natural factors were the primary controlling factors across spatial scales and the contribution of anthropogenic factors was more prominent at the county scale compared to the 3 km scale. These offered an in-depth view for zonal and hierarchical management. The integration of ESs supply–demand considerations and scale effects into land management and planning can help meet the informational needs of decision makers and foster a more harmonious man-land relationship.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 113462"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25003929","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrating ecosystem services (ESs) into spatial planning remains a topical research area in land system science. However, the application of spatial–temporal and cross-scale knowledge on ESs supply and demand in management practice is underrepresented. This study attempted to examine the spatial patterns and interactions of five ESs supply–demand dynamics and reveal their responses to social-ecological drivers to propose optimization strategies for sustainable land management at different scales. We mapped the supply and demand of ESs in the economic belt on the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains (EBNSTM). We identified the interactions and drivers of ecological supply and demand ratios (ESDRs), established zones based on bundles of supply–demand relationships of ESs (BSDRESs) for spatial planning and discussed the scale effects. Our findings indicated the worsening imbalance of supply–demand relationships of ESs. The trade-offs were only observed at the smaller scale and specifically between food provision (FP) and the other ESs. With the change of scale, the composition of BSDRESs had been reconfigured. Natural factors were the primary controlling factors across spatial scales and the contribution of anthropogenic factors was more prominent at the county scale compared to the 3 km scale. These offered an in-depth view for zonal and hierarchical management. The integration of ESs supply–demand considerations and scale effects into land management and planning can help meet the informational needs of decision makers and foster a more harmonious man-land relationship.

Abstract Image

在不同尺度上识别生态系统服务和社会生态驱动因素的供需错配,以支持土地利用规划
将生态系统服务纳入空间规划是土地系统科学研究的热点。然而,在管理实践中,时空和跨尺度知识对ESs供需的应用还不够充分。本研究试图通过分析五种ESs供需动态的空间格局和相互作用,揭示其对社会生态驱动因素的响应,从而提出不同尺度下可持续土地管理的优化策略。我们绘制了天山北坡经济带的ESs供需图(EBNSTM)。我们明确了生态供需比(ESDRs)的相互作用和驱动因素,建立了基于ESs供需关系束(BSDRESs)的空间规划分区,并讨论了规模效应。研究结果表明,中小企业的供需关系失衡正在加剧。这种权衡只在较小的尺度上观察到,特别是在食物供应(FP)和其他ESs之间。随着规模的变化,BSDRESs的组成也发生了变化。自然因子是各空间尺度上的主要控制因子,县域尺度上人为因子的贡献比3 km尺度上更为突出。这为分区和分级管理提供了深入的视角。将ESs供需考虑和规模效应纳入土地管理和规划,有助于满足决策者的信息需要,促进更和谐的人地关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信