{"title":"Identifying supply–demand mismatches of ecosystem services and social-ecological drivers at different scales to support land use planning","authors":"Fan Tian, Xueping Li, Xue Wu, Lu Gong","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Integrating ecosystem services (ESs) into spatial planning remains a topical research area in land system science. However, the application of spatial–temporal and cross-scale knowledge on ESs supply and demand in management practice is underrepresented. This study attempted to examine the spatial patterns and interactions of five ESs supply–demand dynamics and reveal their responses to social-ecological drivers to propose optimization strategies for sustainable land management at different scales. We mapped the supply and demand of ESs in the economic belt on the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains (EBNSTM). We identified the interactions and drivers of ecological supply and demand ratios (ESDRs), established zones based on bundles of supply–demand relationships of ESs (BSDRESs) for spatial planning and discussed the scale effects. Our findings indicated the worsening imbalance of supply–demand relationships of ESs. The trade-offs were only observed at the smaller scale and specifically between food provision (FP) and the other ESs. With the change of scale, the composition of BSDRESs had been reconfigured. Natural factors were the primary controlling factors across spatial scales and the contribution of anthropogenic factors was more prominent at the county scale compared to the 3 km scale. These offered an in-depth view for zonal and hierarchical management. The integration of ESs supply–demand considerations and scale effects into land management and planning can help meet the informational needs of decision makers and foster a more harmonious man-land relationship.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 113462"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25003929","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Integrating ecosystem services (ESs) into spatial planning remains a topical research area in land system science. However, the application of spatial–temporal and cross-scale knowledge on ESs supply and demand in management practice is underrepresented. This study attempted to examine the spatial patterns and interactions of five ESs supply–demand dynamics and reveal their responses to social-ecological drivers to propose optimization strategies for sustainable land management at different scales. We mapped the supply and demand of ESs in the economic belt on the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains (EBNSTM). We identified the interactions and drivers of ecological supply and demand ratios (ESDRs), established zones based on bundles of supply–demand relationships of ESs (BSDRESs) for spatial planning and discussed the scale effects. Our findings indicated the worsening imbalance of supply–demand relationships of ESs. The trade-offs were only observed at the smaller scale and specifically between food provision (FP) and the other ESs. With the change of scale, the composition of BSDRESs had been reconfigured. Natural factors were the primary controlling factors across spatial scales and the contribution of anthropogenic factors was more prominent at the county scale compared to the 3 km scale. These offered an in-depth view for zonal and hierarchical management. The integration of ESs supply–demand considerations and scale effects into land management and planning can help meet the informational needs of decision makers and foster a more harmonious man-land relationship.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.