What they Don’t Want You to Know about Globalization: It’s impact on employment in Nigeria and India

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Mashael Jassim Nasser, Gyanendra Singh Sisodia, Rajesh Mohnot
{"title":"What they Don’t Want You to Know about Globalization: It’s impact on employment in Nigeria and India","authors":"Mashael Jassim Nasser,&nbsp;Gyanendra Singh Sisodia,&nbsp;Rajesh Mohnot","doi":"10.1016/j.resglo.2025.100281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study attempts to investigate the historical and economic narratives, highlighting missed points in the comprehension of globalization and the effects on present-day labor markets in developing countries – India and Nigeria, between 1990 and 2023. The study fills a noticeable gap in the extant literature about the impacts of globalization on labor market dynamics in developing countries. There are positive and negative impacts of globalization, including perceived negative impacts such as loss of employment and positive impacts such as shifts in global wage dynamics. Finding correlations between employment quality and globalization-related variables such as technological advancements, foreign direct investments (FDI), time-specific events, and policy implications can help in developing policies capable of mitigating the adverse effects of globalization on the labor market. The study adopted a panel data analysis that used a fixed effects model to analyze data from the World Bank’s development indicators, the International Labor Organization (ILO) statistics, and the KOF Globalization Index. The study found that while globalization boosted economic integration, it worsened job security, with a globalization coefficient of −0.35 (p &lt; 0.001) and increased wage disparities with a coefficient of 0.58 (p &lt; 0.001). Other findings show a positive correlation between technological advancement and employment quality with a coefficient of 0.10 (p = 0.020); a negative correlation between FDI and employment quality at −0.03 and P = 0.010, and a positive correlation between policy variables and employment quality with a coefficient of 0.25 (p = 0.002). The findings suggest that robust national policies can be used to mitigate the negative consequences of globalization and the policymakers must adopt comprehensive policy measures to benefit from globalization effects while addressing emanating challenges. This study contributes to the literature by offering a nuanced exploration of the multifaceted relationship between global economic integration and local labor market outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34321,"journal":{"name":"Research in Globalization","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Globalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590051X25000140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study attempts to investigate the historical and economic narratives, highlighting missed points in the comprehension of globalization and the effects on present-day labor markets in developing countries – India and Nigeria, between 1990 and 2023. The study fills a noticeable gap in the extant literature about the impacts of globalization on labor market dynamics in developing countries. There are positive and negative impacts of globalization, including perceived negative impacts such as loss of employment and positive impacts such as shifts in global wage dynamics. Finding correlations between employment quality and globalization-related variables such as technological advancements, foreign direct investments (FDI), time-specific events, and policy implications can help in developing policies capable of mitigating the adverse effects of globalization on the labor market. The study adopted a panel data analysis that used a fixed effects model to analyze data from the World Bank’s development indicators, the International Labor Organization (ILO) statistics, and the KOF Globalization Index. The study found that while globalization boosted economic integration, it worsened job security, with a globalization coefficient of −0.35 (p < 0.001) and increased wage disparities with a coefficient of 0.58 (p < 0.001). Other findings show a positive correlation between technological advancement and employment quality with a coefficient of 0.10 (p = 0.020); a negative correlation between FDI and employment quality at −0.03 and P = 0.010, and a positive correlation between policy variables and employment quality with a coefficient of 0.25 (p = 0.002). The findings suggest that robust national policies can be used to mitigate the negative consequences of globalization and the policymakers must adopt comprehensive policy measures to benefit from globalization effects while addressing emanating challenges. This study contributes to the literature by offering a nuanced exploration of the multifaceted relationship between global economic integration and local labor market outcomes.
他们不想让你知道的关于全球化的事情:它对尼日利亚和印度就业的影响
本研究试图调查历史和经济叙事,突出 1990 年至 2023 年期间在理解全球化及其对当今发展中国家--印度和尼日利亚--劳动力市场的影响时的遗漏点。本研究填补了现有文献中关于全球化对发展中国家劳动力市场动态影响的明显空白。全球化既有积极的影响,也有消极的影响,既有人们认为的消极影响,如就业机会的丧失,也有积极的影响,如全球工资动态的变化。找到就业质量与全球化相关变量(如技术进步、外国直接投资(FDI)、特定时间事件和政策影响)之间的相关性,有助于制定能够减轻全球化对劳动力市场不利影响的政策。研究采用面板数据分析,使用固定效应模型分析世界银行发展指标、国际劳工组织(ILO)统计数据和 KOF 全球化指数中的数据。研究发现,全球化在促进经济一体化的同时,也恶化了就业保障,其全球化系数为-0.35(p < 0.001),并加大了工资差距,其系数为 0.58(p < 0.001)。其他研究结果显示,技术进步与就业质量呈正相关,系数为 0.10(P = 0.020);外国直接投资与就业质量呈负相关,系数为-0.03,P = 0.010;政策变量与就业质量呈正相关,系数为 0.25(P = 0.002)。研究结果表明,可以利用强有力的国家政策来减轻全球化的负面影响,决策者必须采取全面的政策措施,从全球化效应中获益,同时应对全球化带来的挑战。本研究对全球经济一体化与当地劳动力市场结果之间的多方面关系进行了细致入微的探讨,为相关文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in Globalization
Research in Globalization Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
79 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信