Reducing antibiotic resistance genes in soil: The role of organic materials in reductive soil disinfestation

IF 7.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ranran Zhang , Chenpan Gong , Yuze Gao , Yushui Chen , Liuyuan Zhou , Qian Lou , Yufei Zhao , Haifeng Zhuang , Jin Zhang , Shengdao Shan , Xiaolin Wang , Xun Qian , Liusheng Lei , Ming Hung Wong
{"title":"Reducing antibiotic resistance genes in soil: The role of organic materials in reductive soil disinfestation","authors":"Ranran Zhang ,&nbsp;Chenpan Gong ,&nbsp;Yuze Gao ,&nbsp;Yushui Chen ,&nbsp;Liuyuan Zhou ,&nbsp;Qian Lou ,&nbsp;Yufei Zhao ,&nbsp;Haifeng Zhuang ,&nbsp;Jin Zhang ,&nbsp;Shengdao Shan ,&nbsp;Xiaolin Wang ,&nbsp;Xun Qian ,&nbsp;Liusheng Lei ,&nbsp;Ming Hung Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Increasing attention has been given to the role of reductive soil disinfestation (RSD) on antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in soil. The selection of organic materials in RSD is crucial to the effectiveness of the RSD method. However, the effects of distinct organic materials on ARGs remains unclear. In this study, we selected straw and rapeseed meal as the organic materials in RSD and explored their effects on ARGs. The results showed that using straw significantly reduced the abundance of ARGs, high-risk ARGs, and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) by 31.5 %–65.8 %, while using rapeseed meal led to ARGs enrichment. Structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis identified MGEs and microbial communities as the primary drivers of ARGS changes under different organic materials. The abundance of MGEs was effectively controlled in straw treatments, reducing the potential for horizontal gene transfer of ARGs. Bacterial diversity was significantly lower in the straw treatments compared to the rapeseed meal treatments, potentially leading to a reduced abundance of ARGs host bacteria. Network co-occurrence analysis further revealed that <em>Symbiobacteraceae</em> and <em>Bacillus</em> were potential bacterial hosts of ARGs. In straw treatments, these genera’ abundance decreased by 12 %–100 % compared to the control (CK) and rapeseed meal groups, further inhibiting the spread of ARGs. These findings demonstrate that RSD with straw as the organic material is more effective in mitigating ARGs compared to rapeseed meal, providing insights into controlling soil antibiotic resistance risks and utilizing agricultural waste resources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":311,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution","volume":"374 ","pages":"Article 126245"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749125006189","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing attention has been given to the role of reductive soil disinfestation (RSD) on antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in soil. The selection of organic materials in RSD is crucial to the effectiveness of the RSD method. However, the effects of distinct organic materials on ARGs remains unclear. In this study, we selected straw and rapeseed meal as the organic materials in RSD and explored their effects on ARGs. The results showed that using straw significantly reduced the abundance of ARGs, high-risk ARGs, and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) by 31.5 %–65.8 %, while using rapeseed meal led to ARGs enrichment. Structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis identified MGEs and microbial communities as the primary drivers of ARGS changes under different organic materials. The abundance of MGEs was effectively controlled in straw treatments, reducing the potential for horizontal gene transfer of ARGs. Bacterial diversity was significantly lower in the straw treatments compared to the rapeseed meal treatments, potentially leading to a reduced abundance of ARGs host bacteria. Network co-occurrence analysis further revealed that Symbiobacteraceae and Bacillus were potential bacterial hosts of ARGs. In straw treatments, these genera’ abundance decreased by 12 %–100 % compared to the control (CK) and rapeseed meal groups, further inhibiting the spread of ARGs. These findings demonstrate that RSD with straw as the organic material is more effective in mitigating ARGs compared to rapeseed meal, providing insights into controlling soil antibiotic resistance risks and utilizing agricultural waste resources.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

减少土壤中的抗生素抗性基因:有机物质在还原性土壤除害中的作用
还原性土壤除害(RSD)对土壤中抗生素抗性基因(ARGs)的影响越来越受到人们的关注。RSD中有机材料的选择对RSD方法的有效性至关重要。然而,不同的有机物质对ARGs的影响仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们选择秸秆和菜籽粕作为RSD中的有机材料,探讨它们对ARGs的影响。结果表明,秸秆处理显著降低了ARGs、高风险ARGs和移动遗传元件(MGEs)的丰度,降低幅度为31.5% ~ 65.8%,而菜籽粕处理使ARGs富集。结构方程模型(SEM)分析表明,MGEs和微生物群落是不同有机质条件下ARGS变化的主要驱动因素。秸秆处理有效地控制了MGEs的丰度,降低了ARGs水平基因转移的可能性。与油菜籽粕处理相比,秸秆处理的细菌多样性显著降低,可能导致ARGs宿主细菌丰度降低。网络共现分析进一步揭示了共生菌科和芽孢杆菌是ARGs潜在的细菌宿主。在秸秆处理下,这些属的丰度比对照(CK)和菜籽粕组降低了12% ~ 100%,进一步抑制了ARGs的传播。上述研究结果表明,与菜籽粕相比,以秸秆为有机材料的RSD在减轻ARGs方面更有效,为控制土壤抗生素耐药性风险和利用农业废弃物资源提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Pollution
Environmental Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2082
审稿时长
2.9 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality research papers and review articles covering all aspects of environmental pollution and its impacts on ecosystems and human health. Subject areas include, but are not limited to: • Sources and occurrences of pollutants that are clearly defined and measured in environmental compartments, food and food-related items, and human bodies; • Interlinks between contaminant exposure and biological, ecological, and human health effects, including those of climate change; • Contaminants of emerging concerns (including but not limited to antibiotic resistant microorganisms or genes, microplastics/nanoplastics, electronic wastes, light, and noise) and/or their biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Laboratory and field studies on the remediation/mitigation of environmental pollution via new techniques and with clear links to biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Modeling of pollution processes, patterns, or trends that is of clear environmental and/or human health interest; • New techniques that measure and examine environmental occurrences, transport, behavior, and effects of pollutants within the environment or the laboratory, provided that they can be clearly used to address problems within regional or global environmental compartments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信