{"title":"You Can't Reach the Lost Valley by Boat: Navigating Bottom‐Up Restoration Pathways","authors":"C. H. Ainsworth, H. C. Repeta, R. L. Scott","doi":"10.1111/faf.12897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We explore bottom‐up restoration pathways on the West Florida Shelf using an Atlantis end‐to‐end biogeochemical food web model. We simulate three ecosystem states, the 1990s, the present day, and a restored future ecosystem. The restored ecosystem is informed by current restoration efforts by the Florida Trustee Implementation Group, responsible for administering restoration projects totaling $680 million. These will restore nearshore habitat, improve water quality and promote user access. We consider four bottom‐up drivers of productivity: seagrass coverage, mangrove presence, wave energy and nutrient inputs. We developed a series of generalised additive models to analyse Florida Wildlife Commission fisheries independent monitoring fish abundance data from inshore sites in Florida. After correcting for confounding environmental variables using statistical models, we describe the relationship between relative abundance and habitat. These relationships were used to parameterize recruitment and feeding effects in Atlantis to reflect the ecology of seagrass‐associated fish. Model results suggest restoration efforts in inshore areas yield a 2%–3% increase in small‐bodied forage fish and support a more robust pelagic food web. Restoration increases demersal fish abundance, and there is a suggestion that mangroves may promote this via a habitat mosaic effect. Cross‐shelf ontogenetic migration offers an express route by which terrigenous production is exported to offshore food webs, but benefits to species of interest are variable. There were increases of 1%–3% for pelagic fish groups and 1%–5% for demersal fish groups.","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12897","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We explore bottom‐up restoration pathways on the West Florida Shelf using an Atlantis end‐to‐end biogeochemical food web model. We simulate three ecosystem states, the 1990s, the present day, and a restored future ecosystem. The restored ecosystem is informed by current restoration efforts by the Florida Trustee Implementation Group, responsible for administering restoration projects totaling $680 million. These will restore nearshore habitat, improve water quality and promote user access. We consider four bottom‐up drivers of productivity: seagrass coverage, mangrove presence, wave energy and nutrient inputs. We developed a series of generalised additive models to analyse Florida Wildlife Commission fisheries independent monitoring fish abundance data from inshore sites in Florida. After correcting for confounding environmental variables using statistical models, we describe the relationship between relative abundance and habitat. These relationships were used to parameterize recruitment and feeding effects in Atlantis to reflect the ecology of seagrass‐associated fish. Model results suggest restoration efforts in inshore areas yield a 2%–3% increase in small‐bodied forage fish and support a more robust pelagic food web. Restoration increases demersal fish abundance, and there is a suggestion that mangroves may promote this via a habitat mosaic effect. Cross‐shelf ontogenetic migration offers an express route by which terrigenous production is exported to offshore food webs, but benefits to species of interest are variable. There were increases of 1%–3% for pelagic fish groups and 1%–5% for demersal fish groups.
期刊介绍:
Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.