Comparison of Prophylactic and Therapeutic Doses of Anticoagulation for Acute Chest Syndrome in Sickle Cell Disease: The TASC Randomized Clinical Trial.
{"title":"Comparison of Prophylactic and Therapeutic Doses of Anticoagulation for Acute Chest Syndrome in Sickle Cell Disease: The TASC Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Armand Mekontso Dessap,Anoosha Habibi,Jean-Benoît Arlet,Muriel Fartoukh,Laurent Guerin,Constance Guillaud,Damien Roux,Johanna Oziel,Stéphanie Ngo,Benjamin Carpentier,Marilucy Lopez-Sublet,Louis Affo,Giovanna Melica,Maryse Etienne-Julan,Isabelle Delacroix,François Lionnet,Gylna Loko,Daniel Da Silva,Marc Michel,Keyvan Razazi,Anaïs Charles-Nelson,Pablo Bartolucci,Ségolène Gendreau,Sandrine Katsahian,Bernard Maitre","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202409-1727oc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPatients with sickle cell disease hospitalised for acute chest syndrome (ACS) are at high risk of in situ pulmonary microthrombosis. We evaluated whether therapeutic anticoagulation could shorten ACS duration.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nTASC is a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial conducted in 12 French hospitals (December 2016-April 2021) in adult ACS patients with no initial thrombosis on chest computerised tomography with pulmonary angiogram. We randomised 172 patients (1:1) to receive either prophylactic or therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight tinzaparin for 7 days. The primary efficacy outcome was time to ACS resolution. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Main secondary outcomes included parenteral opioids consumption, transfusion, mortality at hospital discharge, and hospital readmissions at 6 months.\r\n\r\nFINDINGS\r\nThe primary efficacy outcome, time to ACS resolution, analysed using a Cox model, was shorter with therapeutic anticoagulation than with prophylactic doses (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% CI: [0.51-0.99]; p=0.044). As a supplemental estimate, the restricted mean time to ACS resolution (over a 15-day horizon or discharge) was shorter with therapeutic doses (4.8±0.4 vs 6.1±0.5 days). The primary safety outcome (major bleeding) did not occur in either group. The cumulative dose of parenteral opioids was lower with therapeutic anticoagulation: (124 [80;272] vs 219 [65;378] mg morphine equivalent, difference: -96, 95%CI: -202 to -46, p=0.02). Other short- and long-term secondary outcomes were similar between groups.\r\n\r\nINTERPRETATION\r\nIn adult patients with ACS, a therapeutic anticoagulation shortened ACS duration and reduced opioids consumption compared with prophylactic doses, without increasing bleeding risk. Clinical trial registration available at www.\r\n\r\nCLINICALTRIALS\r\ngov, ID: NCT02580773.","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202409-1727oc","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Patients with sickle cell disease hospitalised for acute chest syndrome (ACS) are at high risk of in situ pulmonary microthrombosis. We evaluated whether therapeutic anticoagulation could shorten ACS duration.
METHODS
TASC is a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial conducted in 12 French hospitals (December 2016-April 2021) in adult ACS patients with no initial thrombosis on chest computerised tomography with pulmonary angiogram. We randomised 172 patients (1:1) to receive either prophylactic or therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight tinzaparin for 7 days. The primary efficacy outcome was time to ACS resolution. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Main secondary outcomes included parenteral opioids consumption, transfusion, mortality at hospital discharge, and hospital readmissions at 6 months.
FINDINGS
The primary efficacy outcome, time to ACS resolution, analysed using a Cox model, was shorter with therapeutic anticoagulation than with prophylactic doses (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% CI: [0.51-0.99]; p=0.044). As a supplemental estimate, the restricted mean time to ACS resolution (over a 15-day horizon or discharge) was shorter with therapeutic doses (4.8±0.4 vs 6.1±0.5 days). The primary safety outcome (major bleeding) did not occur in either group. The cumulative dose of parenteral opioids was lower with therapeutic anticoagulation: (124 [80;272] vs 219 [65;378] mg morphine equivalent, difference: -96, 95%CI: -202 to -46, p=0.02). Other short- and long-term secondary outcomes were similar between groups.
INTERPRETATION
In adult patients with ACS, a therapeutic anticoagulation shortened ACS duration and reduced opioids consumption compared with prophylactic doses, without increasing bleeding risk. Clinical trial registration available at www.
CLINICALTRIALS
gov, ID: NCT02580773.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences.
A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.