Rachel A Plouffe,Stephanie A Houle,Michelle Birch,Natalie Ein,Anthony Nazarov,J Don Richardson
{"title":"Validation of the Moral Injury Outcome Scale in Canadian health care workers.","authors":"Rachel A Plouffe,Stephanie A Houle,Michelle Birch,Natalie Ein,Anthony Nazarov,J Don Richardson","doi":"10.1037/pas0001386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Moral injury (MI), characterized by distress stemming from exposure to events that transgress one's moral beliefs, has gained prominence as a focal point of study in military and Veteran populations. In recent years, researchers and clinicians have acknowledged that MI carries substantial significance within health care settings. However, existing measures of MI may not adequately address the experiences of health care workers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a more recent measure of MI, the Moral Injury Outcome Scale (MIOS), which has been previously validated in military personnel, for use in Canadian health care workers (n = 786). The evaluation included its factorial, convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity, measurement invariance, and internal consistency reliability. Results showed that the MIOS demonstrated a two-factor structure that was invariant at the configural, metric, and scalar level when compared with Canadian Veterans. Lastly, the MIOS showed strong convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. Overall, our findings revealed that the MIOS possesses robust psychometric properties. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001386","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Moral injury (MI), characterized by distress stemming from exposure to events that transgress one's moral beliefs, has gained prominence as a focal point of study in military and Veteran populations. In recent years, researchers and clinicians have acknowledged that MI carries substantial significance within health care settings. However, existing measures of MI may not adequately address the experiences of health care workers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a more recent measure of MI, the Moral Injury Outcome Scale (MIOS), which has been previously validated in military personnel, for use in Canadian health care workers (n = 786). The evaluation included its factorial, convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity, measurement invariance, and internal consistency reliability. Results showed that the MIOS demonstrated a two-factor structure that was invariant at the configural, metric, and scalar level when compared with Canadian Veterans. Lastly, the MIOS showed strong convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. Overall, our findings revealed that the MIOS possesses robust psychometric properties. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews