Cord Blood Treatment for Children With Cerebral Palsy: Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Megan Finch-Edmondson,Madison C B Paton,Annabel Webb,Mahmoud Reza Ashrafi,Remy K Blatch-Williams,Charles S Cox,Kylie Crompton,Alexandra R Griffin,MinYoung Kim,Steven Kosmach,Joanne Kurtzberg,Masoumeh Nouri,Mi Ri Suh,Jessica Sun,Morteza Zarrabi,Iona Novak
{"title":"Cord Blood Treatment for Children With Cerebral Palsy: Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Megan Finch-Edmondson,Madison C B Paton,Annabel Webb,Mahmoud Reza Ashrafi,Remy K Blatch-Williams,Charles S Cox,Kylie Crompton,Alexandra R Griffin,MinYoung Kim,Steven Kosmach,Joanne Kurtzberg,Masoumeh Nouri,Mi Ri Suh,Jessica Sun,Morteza Zarrabi,Iona Novak","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-068999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\r\nUmbilical cord blood (UCB) is a novel treatment for cerebral palsy (CP), with trials indicating UCB can improve gross motor function. However, heterogeneity has limited the ability to interpret findings.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nAssess the safety and efficacy of UCB for improving gross motor function in children with CP, including exploring cell dose effect and responder subgroups.\r\n\r\nDATA SOURCES\r\nIndividual participant data from published reports and registered trials identified via systematic searches.\r\n\r\nSTUDY SELECTION\r\nStudies administering UCB to individuals with CP collecting Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) scores.\r\n\r\nDATA EXTRACTION\r\nA 1-stage individual participant data meta-analysis was conducted in R to obtain the pooled effect of UCB and cell dose effect on GMFM using linear mixed models. Responder subgroups were also investigated.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nFour hundred ninety-eight participant data records were obtained from 11 studies. Main analysis of 170 participants treated with UCB and 171 controls demonstrated UCB increased mean GMFM-66 score compared with controls by 1.36 points at 6 months (95% CI, 0.41-2.32; P = .005) and 1.42 at 12 months (95% CI, 0.31-2.52; P = .012). Mean GMFM-66 effect size increased with increasing cell dose at 3 (P < .001) and 12 months (P = .047). CP severity and baseline age were associated with GMFM-66 effect size. The rate of serious adverse events was similar between groups.\r\n\r\nLIMITATIONS\r\nHeterogeneity across variables and time points, reducing subanalysis power.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nUCB is safe and provides benefit for improving gross motor function in some children with CP, with higher doses associated with increased effect size. Younger participants (aged approximately <5 years) with milder CP showed increased benefit. Findings will help design future trials with precision.","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-068999","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is a novel treatment for cerebral palsy (CP), with trials indicating UCB can improve gross motor function. However, heterogeneity has limited the ability to interpret findings. OBJECTIVE Assess the safety and efficacy of UCB for improving gross motor function in children with CP, including exploring cell dose effect and responder subgroups. DATA SOURCES Individual participant data from published reports and registered trials identified via systematic searches. STUDY SELECTION Studies administering UCB to individuals with CP collecting Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) scores. DATA EXTRACTION A 1-stage individual participant data meta-analysis was conducted in R to obtain the pooled effect of UCB and cell dose effect on GMFM using linear mixed models. Responder subgroups were also investigated. RESULTS Four hundred ninety-eight participant data records were obtained from 11 studies. Main analysis of 170 participants treated with UCB and 171 controls demonstrated UCB increased mean GMFM-66 score compared with controls by 1.36 points at 6 months (95% CI, 0.41-2.32; P = .005) and 1.42 at 12 months (95% CI, 0.31-2.52; P = .012). Mean GMFM-66 effect size increased with increasing cell dose at 3 (P < .001) and 12 months (P = .047). CP severity and baseline age were associated with GMFM-66 effect size. The rate of serious adverse events was similar between groups. LIMITATIONS Heterogeneity across variables and time points, reducing subanalysis power. CONCLUSIONS UCB is safe and provides benefit for improving gross motor function in some children with CP, with higher doses associated with increased effect size. Younger participants (aged approximately <5 years) with milder CP showed increased benefit. Findings will help design future trials with precision.
脑瘫儿童脐带血治疗:个体参与者数据荟萃分析
脐带血(UCB)是脑瘫(CP)的一种新治疗方法,试验表明脐带血可以改善大运动功能。然而,异质性限制了解释研究结果的能力。目的评估UCB改善CP患儿大运动功能的安全性和有效性,包括探讨细胞剂量效应和反应亚组。数据来源通过系统检索确定的已发表报告和已注册试验的个体参与者数据。研究选择对CP患者进行UCB治疗,收集大运动功能测量(GMFM)评分。数据提取在R中进行1期个体参与者数据荟萃分析,采用线性混合模型获得UCB和细胞剂量效应对GMFM的合并效应。应答者亚组也进行了调查。结果从11项研究中获得498份参与者数据记录。对170名接受UCB治疗的参与者和171名对照组的主要分析表明,与对照组相比,UCB在6个月时使GMFM-66平均评分提高了1.36分(95% CI, 0.41-2.32;P = 0.005), 12个月时为1.42 (95% CI, 0.31-2.52;p = .012)。在第3个月(P < 0.001)和第12个月(P = 0.047),平均GMFM-66效应值随细胞剂量的增加而增加。CP严重程度和基线年龄与GMFM-66效应大小相关。两组间严重不良事件发生率相似。限制跨变量和时间点的异构性,减少子分析能力。结论:此类药物是安全的,可改善部分CP患儿的大运动功能,且剂量越大,效应值越高。较轻CP的年轻参与者(年龄约<5岁)表现出更大的获益。研究结果将有助于精确地设计未来的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatrics
Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
791
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field. The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability. Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights. As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信