“Did You See That Too?” Who Are the Observers of Workplace Mistreatment

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Sarah McMahon, Lauren Manley, Laura Johnson, Patricia Greenberg, Alexandra I. Zelin, Tracy Andrews, Victoria L. Banyard
{"title":"“Did You See That Too?” Who Are the Observers of Workplace Mistreatment","authors":"Sarah McMahon, Lauren Manley, Laura Johnson, Patricia Greenberg, Alexandra I. Zelin, Tracy Andrews, Victoria L. Banyard","doi":"10.1177/08862605251331527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bystander intervention (BI) is an approach that has been used widely for addressing sexual and dating violence and has more recently been extended to other settings and types of harm, including workplace mistreatment. Understanding more about the opportunity to intervene—including the types of observed behaviors, who is observing them, and the frequency and breadth of those observations—is an important step to help inform the development of workplace BI programs. As such, the current study involved an anonymous online survey about observing workplace mistreatment, distributed by Qualtrics panel service to adult employees in workplaces throughout the United States ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 1,484). A total of 64.5% of participants indicated that they witnessed at least one type of mistreatment behavior against a work colleague within the past 12 months, and almost two-thirds of the behaviors were observed more than once. Most behaviors were observed in-person at work and were predominantly seen and seen/heard about. Employees who were nonbinary gender, had an advanced degree, were younger, and were shift workers were more likely to witness mistreatment. The findings indicate that witnessing mistreatment is common and that employees observe multiple and co-occurring behaviors, which suggests that BI strategies need to be multifaceted. The results also suggest that BI training should acknowledge people’s social identity, work status, type of position, and access to power, while also being accompanied by good organizational responses and structures.","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251331527","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bystander intervention (BI) is an approach that has been used widely for addressing sexual and dating violence and has more recently been extended to other settings and types of harm, including workplace mistreatment. Understanding more about the opportunity to intervene—including the types of observed behaviors, who is observing them, and the frequency and breadth of those observations—is an important step to help inform the development of workplace BI programs. As such, the current study involved an anonymous online survey about observing workplace mistreatment, distributed by Qualtrics panel service to adult employees in workplaces throughout the United States ( n = 1,484). A total of 64.5% of participants indicated that they witnessed at least one type of mistreatment behavior against a work colleague within the past 12 months, and almost two-thirds of the behaviors were observed more than once. Most behaviors were observed in-person at work and were predominantly seen and seen/heard about. Employees who were nonbinary gender, had an advanced degree, were younger, and were shift workers were more likely to witness mistreatment. The findings indicate that witnessing mistreatment is common and that employees observe multiple and co-occurring behaviors, which suggests that BI strategies need to be multifaceted. The results also suggest that BI training should acknowledge people’s social identity, work status, type of position, and access to power, while also being accompanied by good organizational responses and structures.
“你也看到了吗?”谁是职场虐待的观察者
旁观者干预(BI)是一种广泛用于解决性暴力和约会暴力的方法,最近已扩展到其他环境和类型的伤害,包括工作场所虐待。更多地了解干预的机会——包括观察到的行为的类型、谁在观察这些行为,以及这些观察的频率和广度——是帮助了解工作场所BI程序开发的重要一步。因此,目前的研究涉及一项关于观察工作场所虐待的匿名在线调查,由Qualtrics小组服务向美国各地工作场所的成年员工分发(n = 1,484)。共有64.5%的参与者表示,他们在过去12个月内目睹了至少一种针对同事的虐待行为,其中近三分之二的行为被观察到不止一次。大多数行为都是在工作中亲自观察到的,主要是被看到和看到/听到的。非二元性别、高学历、年轻、轮班的员工更有可能目睹虐待。研究结果表明,目睹虐待是常见的,员工观察到多种和共同发生的行为,这表明商业智能战略需要是多方面的。结果还表明,商业智能培训应承认人们的社会身份、工作状态、职位类型和权力获取途径,同时还应伴随着良好的组织反应和结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信