Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men’s Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence in Four Celtic Nations: A Mixed-Method Study

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Steven Maxwell, Kareena McAloney, Dimitra Strongylou, Rosaleen O’Brien, Rosie Stenhouse, Jamie Frankis
{"title":"Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men’s Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence in Four Celtic Nations: A Mixed-Method Study","authors":"Steven Maxwell, Kareena McAloney, Dimitra Strongylou, Rosaleen O’Brien, Rosie Stenhouse, Jamie Frankis","doi":"10.1177/08862605251331077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the prevalence, forms, and unique cultural manifestations of intimate partner violence (IPV) among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in four Celtic nations (Scotland, Ireland, Northern Ireland, and Wales) while recognizing differences due to gendered heteronormativity. The research involved a cross-sectional survey of 1,389 participants and in-depth narrative interviews with 10 individuals, with recruitment conducted via GBMSM social and sociosexual media platforms. The study employed descriptive statistics to estimate IPV prevalence and types, while logistic regression was used to identify socio-behavioral predictors of IPV. Findings suggest that the 1-year IPV prevalence among GBMSM was 33% ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 546), with emotional abuse (13%) and belittlement (13%) as the most common forms. Notably, all qualitative participants reported experiencing coercive control. The narratives indicated that IPV predominantly occurred in longer-term relationships, with no instances identified in singular intimate encounters. The study found that while the prevalence of IPV among GBMSM is similar to that observed among heterosexual women, the nature of IPV and the recognition of certain forms of nonconsensual sex as IPV differ between these populations. These differences can be better understood through the lens of masculinities discourses and the heteronormative framework of Western societies. The study underscores the importance of building a dedicated body of evidence on IPV within sexual minority communities to inform policy and provide appropriate support through health and social care initiatives. Addressing IPV in GBMSM relationships is crucial for safeguarding this community and contributing to the broader societal goal of eradicating violence.","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":"129 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251331077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the prevalence, forms, and unique cultural manifestations of intimate partner violence (IPV) among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in four Celtic nations (Scotland, Ireland, Northern Ireland, and Wales) while recognizing differences due to gendered heteronormativity. The research involved a cross-sectional survey of 1,389 participants and in-depth narrative interviews with 10 individuals, with recruitment conducted via GBMSM social and sociosexual media platforms. The study employed descriptive statistics to estimate IPV prevalence and types, while logistic regression was used to identify socio-behavioral predictors of IPV. Findings suggest that the 1-year IPV prevalence among GBMSM was 33% ( n = 546), with emotional abuse (13%) and belittlement (13%) as the most common forms. Notably, all qualitative participants reported experiencing coercive control. The narratives indicated that IPV predominantly occurred in longer-term relationships, with no instances identified in singular intimate encounters. The study found that while the prevalence of IPV among GBMSM is similar to that observed among heterosexual women, the nature of IPV and the recognition of certain forms of nonconsensual sex as IPV differ between these populations. These differences can be better understood through the lens of masculinities discourses and the heteronormative framework of Western societies. The study underscores the importance of building a dedicated body of evidence on IPV within sexual minority communities to inform policy and provide appropriate support through health and social care initiatives. Addressing IPV in GBMSM relationships is crucial for safeguarding this community and contributing to the broader societal goal of eradicating violence.
同性恋、双性恋和其他与男性发生性关系的男性在四个凯尔特国家的亲密伴侣暴力经历:一项混合方法研究
本研究调查了四个凯尔特民族(苏格兰、爱尔兰、北爱尔兰和威尔士)同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者(GBMSM)中亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的流行程度、形式和独特的文化表现,同时认识到性别异性恋的差异。该研究对1389名参与者进行了横断面调查,并对10个人进行了深入的叙述访谈,招募工作通过GBMSM社交和社会性媒体平台进行。本研究采用描述性统计来估计IPV的患病率和类型,同时使用逻辑回归来确定IPV的社会行为预测因子。研究结果表明,GBMSM中1年IPV患病率为33% (n = 546),其中情绪虐待(13%)和贬低(13%)是最常见的形式。值得注意的是,所有定性参与者都报告经历了强制控制。这些叙述表明,IPV主要发生在长期关系中,没有在单独的亲密接触中发现实例。研究发现,虽然GBMSM中IPV的患病率与异性恋女性相似,但IPV的性质和对某些非自愿性行为的认识在这些人群中有所不同。这些差异可以通过男性话语和西方社会的异性恋规范框架来更好地理解。该研究强调了在性少数群体社区内建立一个专门的IPV证据机构的重要性,以便为政策提供信息,并通过卫生和社会保健举措提供适当的支持。解决同性恋和男同性恋关系中的IPV问题对于保护这一社区和促进消除暴力这一更广泛的社会目标至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信