Does human-AI collaboration promote or hinder employees’ safety performance? A job demands-resources perspective

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Yunshuo Liu, Yanbin Li
{"title":"Does human-AI collaboration promote or hinder employees’ safety performance? A job demands-resources perspective","authors":"Yunshuo Liu,&nbsp;Yanbin Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the widespread implementation of artificial intelligence (AI), human-AI collaboration has become an important and influential employment model. However, there is no consensus in the literature on its effectiveness, and little is known about how it affects employees’ safety performance. Drawing on the job demands-resources (JD-R) theory, this study proposes a double-edged sword effect model of human-AI collaboration on employees’ safety performance. Using three-wave data from 286 employees, the findings show that human-AI collaboration fosters intrinsic motivation and work engagement, thereby enhancing safety performance (the motivation pathway), while also increasing workplace loneliness and job burnout, which inhibits safety performance (the strain pathway). Furthermore, employee resilience amplified the positive impact of human-AI collaboration on intrinsic motivation and mitigated its effects on workplace loneliness. These findings enrich our understanding of human-AI collaboration and offer practical insights for AI adoption and safety management in organizations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 106872"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753525000979","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the widespread implementation of artificial intelligence (AI), human-AI collaboration has become an important and influential employment model. However, there is no consensus in the literature on its effectiveness, and little is known about how it affects employees’ safety performance. Drawing on the job demands-resources (JD-R) theory, this study proposes a double-edged sword effect model of human-AI collaboration on employees’ safety performance. Using three-wave data from 286 employees, the findings show that human-AI collaboration fosters intrinsic motivation and work engagement, thereby enhancing safety performance (the motivation pathway), while also increasing workplace loneliness and job burnout, which inhibits safety performance (the strain pathway). Furthermore, employee resilience amplified the positive impact of human-AI collaboration on intrinsic motivation and mitigated its effects on workplace loneliness. These findings enrich our understanding of human-AI collaboration and offer practical insights for AI adoption and safety management in organizations.
人类与人工智能的协作是促进还是阻碍了员工的安全绩效?工作需要资源的观点
随着人工智能(AI)的广泛应用,人机协作已成为一种重要且有影响力的就业模式。然而,文献对其有效性没有共识,对其如何影响员工的安全绩效知之甚少。本研究利用工作需求-资源(job requirements -resources, JD-R)理论,提出了人-人工智能协同对员工安全绩效的双刃剑效应模型。利用来自286名员工的三波数据,研究结果表明,人类与人工智能的协作促进了内在动机和工作投入,从而提高了安全绩效(激励途径),同时也增加了工作场所的孤独感和工作倦怠,从而抑制了安全绩效(压力途径)。此外,员工弹性放大了人类-人工智能协作对内在动机的积极影响,并减轻了其对工作场所孤独感的影响。这些发现丰富了我们对人类与人工智能协作的理解,并为组织中人工智能的采用和安全管理提供了实用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信