{"title":"Desktop Method to Map and Assess Environmental Impacts of Formal and Informal Mountain Biking Trails in an Urban National Park","authors":"Isabella Smith, Catherine Marina Pickering","doi":"10.1111/emr.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recreational trails, including informal trails created by visitors, have a range of ecological impacts, but mapping and assessing these impacts can be expensive and time-consuming. It is increasingly possible to harness publicly available data posted by park visitors to fitness platforms and combine it with other spatial and field data to help prioritise management actions and enhance conservation and visitor experiences. Here we outline and then apply such a desktop methodology to assess the extensive network of formal and informal mountain biking trails in a popular urban national park in Australia. Across Nerang National Park on the Gold Coast, 31.4 km of formal and 36.2 km of informal mountain bike trails were identified and assessed using data from the popular fitness platform Trailforks and existing trail records from managers. Informal mountain biking trails were mostly in the higher and more remote parts of the Park on steeper slopes and were generally less popular than the formal trails closer to the main entrance. The informal trails have resulted in the loss of 0.8% of vegetation, increased fragmentation and potentially disturb wildlife across 13% of the Park, with some informal trails traversing an important wetland catchment. The results demonstrate the scale and nature of potential impacts of informal trails, which have doubled the area of trails in Nerang National Park. They highlight the need for specific management actions, such as closing and restoring informal trails, particularly when poorly designed and in areas of high conservation value.</p>","PeriodicalId":54325,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Management & Restoration","volume":"26 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emr.70011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Management & Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.70011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recreational trails, including informal trails created by visitors, have a range of ecological impacts, but mapping and assessing these impacts can be expensive and time-consuming. It is increasingly possible to harness publicly available data posted by park visitors to fitness platforms and combine it with other spatial and field data to help prioritise management actions and enhance conservation and visitor experiences. Here we outline and then apply such a desktop methodology to assess the extensive network of formal and informal mountain biking trails in a popular urban national park in Australia. Across Nerang National Park on the Gold Coast, 31.4 km of formal and 36.2 km of informal mountain bike trails were identified and assessed using data from the popular fitness platform Trailforks and existing trail records from managers. Informal mountain biking trails were mostly in the higher and more remote parts of the Park on steeper slopes and were generally less popular than the formal trails closer to the main entrance. The informal trails have resulted in the loss of 0.8% of vegetation, increased fragmentation and potentially disturb wildlife across 13% of the Park, with some informal trails traversing an important wetland catchment. The results demonstrate the scale and nature of potential impacts of informal trails, which have doubled the area of trails in Nerang National Park. They highlight the need for specific management actions, such as closing and restoring informal trails, particularly when poorly designed and in areas of high conservation value.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Management & Restoration is a peer-reviewed journal with the dual aims of (i) reporting the latest science to assist ecologically appropriate management and restoration actions and (ii) providing a forum for reporting on these actions. Guided by an editorial board made up of researchers and practitioners, EMR seeks features, topical opinion pieces, research reports, short notes and project summaries applicable to Australasian ecosystems to encourage more regionally-appropriate management. Where relevant, contributions should draw on international science and practice and highlight any relevance to the global challenge of integrating biodiversity conservation in a rapidly changing world.
Topic areas:
Improved management and restoration of plant communities, fauna and habitat; coastal, marine and riparian zones; restoration ethics and philosophy; planning; monitoring and assessment; policy and legislation; landscape pattern and design; integrated ecosystems management; socio-economic issues and solutions; techniques and methodology; threatened species; genetic issues; indigenous land management; weeds and feral animal control; landscape arts and aesthetics; education and communication; community involvement.