求助PDF
{"title":"Comparative Study on Numerical Simulation of CH4 Breakthrough Pressure in Unsaturated Rock Based on Step-By-Step Method and Continuous Injection Method","authors":"Jiaqi Zhao, Yi Li, Qi Li, Wentao Ban, Qingchun Yu","doi":"10.1002/ghg.2335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Gas breakthrough pressure is a key parameter affecting gas production and evaluation of tight reservoir sealing capabilities. This study aims to explore the impact of different injection methods on CH<sub>4</sub> breakthrough pressure in unsaturated rocks. COMSOL Multiphysics was used to simulate the CH<sub>4</sub> breakthrough process, and comparative analysis was conducted using step-by-step and continuous injection methods. The results show that the step-by-step method has higher measurement accuracy under low CH<sub>4</sub> breakthrough pressure and is suitable for scenarios that require precise evaluation, whereas the continuous injection method is more efficient under high CH<sub>4</sub> breakthrough pressure and is suitable for rapid evaluation needs. According to outcomes of simulation, this research suggested a numerical optimization framework aimed at forecasting the breakthrough pressure of CH<sub>4</sub> and verified the accuracy and applicability of the model through linear fitting of experimental data and predicted values. In addition, the study also conducted a sensitivity analysis on the pore distribution index (<i>m</i>) and injection flow rate (<i>u<sub>in</sub></i>) in the van Genuchten model. The results show that <i>u<sub>in</sub></i> has a small impact on breakthrough pressure, whereas <i>m</i> has a considerable effect on breakthrough pressure. An increase in <i>m</i> leads to an increase in breakthrough pressure, thereby enhancing the sealing performance of rock core. This study reveals the applicability difference between the step-by-step method and the continuous injection method in predicting CH<sub>4</sub> breakthrough pressure and proposes an effective prediction method based on numerical simulation, which provides valuable insights for selecting gas injection methods and predicting breakthrough pressure in rocks. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12796,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","volume":"15 2","pages":"229-247"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ghg.2335","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Gas breakthrough pressure is a key parameter affecting gas production and evaluation of tight reservoir sealing capabilities. This study aims to explore the impact of different injection methods on CH4 breakthrough pressure in unsaturated rocks. COMSOL Multiphysics was used to simulate the CH4 breakthrough process, and comparative analysis was conducted using step-by-step and continuous injection methods. The results show that the step-by-step method has higher measurement accuracy under low CH4 breakthrough pressure and is suitable for scenarios that require precise evaluation, whereas the continuous injection method is more efficient under high CH4 breakthrough pressure and is suitable for rapid evaluation needs. According to outcomes of simulation, this research suggested a numerical optimization framework aimed at forecasting the breakthrough pressure of CH4 and verified the accuracy and applicability of the model through linear fitting of experimental data and predicted values. In addition, the study also conducted a sensitivity analysis on the pore distribution index (m ) and injection flow rate (uin ) in the van Genuchten model. The results show that uin has a small impact on breakthrough pressure, whereas m has a considerable effect on breakthrough pressure. An increase in m leads to an increase in breakthrough pressure, thereby enhancing the sealing performance of rock core. This study reveals the applicability difference between the step-by-step method and the continuous injection method in predicting CH4 breakthrough pressure and proposes an effective prediction method based on numerical simulation, which provides valuable insights for selecting gas injection methods and predicting breakthrough pressure in rocks. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
基于分步法与连续注入法的非饱和岩石CH4突破压力数值模拟对比研究
气侵压力是影响致密储层产气量和密封能力评价的关键参数。本研究旨在探讨不同注入方式对非饱和岩石中CH4突破压力的影响。利用COMSOL Multiphysics模拟CH4突破过程,采用分步注入和连续注入两种方法进行对比分析。结果表明,分步法在低CH4突破压力下具有较高的测量精度,适用于需要精确评价的场景,而连续注入法在高CH4突破压力下效率更高,适用于快速评价需求。根据模拟结果,本研究提出了预测CH4突破压力的数值优化框架,并通过实验数据与预测值的线性拟合验证了模型的准确性和适用性。此外,本研究还对van Genuchten模型中的孔隙分布指数(m)和注射流速(win)进行了敏感性分析。结果表明:uin对突破压力影响较小,而m对突破压力影响较大。m的增大导致突破压力的增大,从而提高岩心的密封性能。研究揭示了分步法与连续注入法预测CH4突破压力的适用性差异,提出了一种基于数值模拟的有效预测方法,为选择注气方式和预测岩石中突破压力提供了有价值的见解。©2025化学工业协会和John Wiley &;儿子,有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。