Cecilie D. Vestergaard , Marco Donia , Kasper Madsen , Henrik Schmidt , Adam A. Luczak , Lars Bastholt , Eva Ellebaek , Inge M. Svane
{"title":"Impact of assessment-to-treatment interval and metastatic biopsy site on the predictive value of PD-L1 expression at the 1 % cut-off level in melanoma","authors":"Cecilie D. Vestergaard , Marco Donia , Kasper Madsen , Henrik Schmidt , Adam A. Luczak , Lars Bastholt , Eva Ellebaek , Inge M. Svane","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intratumoral PD-L1 expression at the 1 % cut-off predicts clinical outcomes and may guide first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) selection for metastatic melanoma (MM). However, the impact of the interval between PD-L1 assessment and ICI initiation and the metastatic site used for PD-L1 evaluation, remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this nationwide cohort study we used the Danish Metastatic Melanoma Database (DAMMED) and the Danish Pathology Registry to analyze patients with MM treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 from January 2017 to February 2024. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Log-rank tests and Cox regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Data from 1137 patients were analyzed. Among patients with PD-L1 assessed within 90 days of treatment (n = 964; 55.2 % PD-L1 <1 %, 44.8 % PD-L1 ≥1 %), combination therapy improved outcomes in PD-L1 < 1 % (PFS adjusted (a)HR 0.62; 95 % CI 0.48–0.80; p < 0.001, OS aHR 0.64; 95 % CI 0.48–0.85; p = 0.002), while outcomes were comparable for PD-L1 ≥ 1 % patients (PFS aHR 0.90; 95 % CI 0.62–1.30; p = 0.57, OS aHR 0.97; 95 % CI 0.60–1.57; p = 0.89). For PD-L1 assessed > 90 days prior (n = 173), this pattern was less pronounced. Among 48 paired PD-L1 assessments from the same organ, discordance occurred in 25 %. Combination therapy improved PFS for patients with PD-L1 < 1 % skin/subcutaneous (aHR 0.51; 95 % CI 0.34–0.76; p < 0.001) and visceral metastases (aHR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.42–1.02; p = 0.060) while this association was not evident for lymph node metastases (aHR 0.79; 95 % CI 0.48–1.29; p = 0.35).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PD-L1 seems a reliable predictive biomarker in MM, when assessed on tissue obtained within 90 days prior to ICI initiation. Non-nodal metastatic sites appear preferable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 115402"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804925001832","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Intratumoral PD-L1 expression at the 1 % cut-off predicts clinical outcomes and may guide first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) selection for metastatic melanoma (MM). However, the impact of the interval between PD-L1 assessment and ICI initiation and the metastatic site used for PD-L1 evaluation, remains unclear.
Methods
In this nationwide cohort study we used the Danish Metastatic Melanoma Database (DAMMED) and the Danish Pathology Registry to analyze patients with MM treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 from January 2017 to February 2024. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Log-rank tests and Cox regression.
Results
Data from 1137 patients were analyzed. Among patients with PD-L1 assessed within 90 days of treatment (n = 964; 55.2 % PD-L1 <1 %, 44.8 % PD-L1 ≥1 %), combination therapy improved outcomes in PD-L1 < 1 % (PFS adjusted (a)HR 0.62; 95 % CI 0.48–0.80; p < 0.001, OS aHR 0.64; 95 % CI 0.48–0.85; p = 0.002), while outcomes were comparable for PD-L1 ≥ 1 % patients (PFS aHR 0.90; 95 % CI 0.62–1.30; p = 0.57, OS aHR 0.97; 95 % CI 0.60–1.57; p = 0.89). For PD-L1 assessed > 90 days prior (n = 173), this pattern was less pronounced. Among 48 paired PD-L1 assessments from the same organ, discordance occurred in 25 %. Combination therapy improved PFS for patients with PD-L1 < 1 % skin/subcutaneous (aHR 0.51; 95 % CI 0.34–0.76; p < 0.001) and visceral metastases (aHR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.42–1.02; p = 0.060) while this association was not evident for lymph node metastases (aHR 0.79; 95 % CI 0.48–1.29; p = 0.35).
Conclusions
PD-L1 seems a reliable predictive biomarker in MM, when assessed on tissue obtained within 90 days prior to ICI initiation. Non-nodal metastatic sites appear preferable.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Cancer (EJC) serves as a comprehensive platform integrating preclinical, digital, translational, and clinical research across the spectrum of cancer. From epidemiology, carcinogenesis, and biology to groundbreaking innovations in cancer treatment and patient care, the journal covers a wide array of topics. We publish original research, reviews, previews, editorial comments, and correspondence, fostering dialogue and advancement in the fight against cancer. Join us in our mission to drive progress and improve outcomes in cancer research and patient care.