Integrating clinicopathological and molecular data to assess the biological behavior of uterine inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Quang Hiep Bui , Michaela Krausová , Nikola Hájková , Jan Hojný , Michaela Kendall Bártů , Romana Vránková , Marta Kalousová , Filip Frühauf , Michael Michal , Kristýna Němejcová , Ivana Stružinská , Pavel Dundr
{"title":"Integrating clinicopathological and molecular data to assess the biological behavior of uterine inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors","authors":"Quang Hiep Bui ,&nbsp;Michaela Krausová ,&nbsp;Nikola Hájková ,&nbsp;Jan Hojný ,&nbsp;Michaela Kendall Bártů ,&nbsp;Romana Vránková ,&nbsp;Marta Kalousová ,&nbsp;Filip Frühauf ,&nbsp;Michael Michal ,&nbsp;Kristýna Němejcová ,&nbsp;Ivana Stružinská ,&nbsp;Pavel Dundr","doi":"10.1016/j.prp.2025.155959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Assessing the biological behavior of uterine inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) remains challenging. This study evaluated previously proposed risk schemes and features in 9 IMTs (6 indolent, 3 aggressive) by integrating clinicopathological features, immunohistochemistry, and next-generation sequencing (NGS). High-risk features (necrosis, infiltrative growth, nuclear atypia) were present in both groups, with LVSI in 1/3 of aggressive IMTs. Aberrant p16 expression and <em>CDKN2A/2B</em> deletions were noted in 2/3 aggressive cases. All cases harbored <em>ALK</em> fusions, wild-type p53, and lacked pathogenic gene mutations. Aggressive cases harbored arm-level and segmental copy number gains/losses at chr 1, 2, X, and had significantly reduced <em>AR</em> expression. The clinicopathological risk stratification score (CRSS) predicted the biological behavior correctly in cases with complete clinicopathological data (size, mitoses, age, infiltrative growth). Two morcellated cases (one indolent and one aggressive) would have been predicted as low risk based solely on the absence of pathogenic mutations. Hereby, the reliability of the proposed CRSS was confirmed. Aberrant p16 expression predicted malignant behavior in 2/3 aggressive cases. Absence of pathogenic mutations or presence of large scale CNVs does not seem to be a predictor of clinical behavior. Additional studies and NGS analyses of more cases may improve risk stratification for patients with incomplete clinicopathological information and may reveal additional risk stratifiers (such as the suggested large-scale CNVs or <em>AR</em> downregulation) for IMTs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19916,"journal":{"name":"Pathology, research and practice","volume":"270 ","pages":"Article 155959"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology, research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0344033825001517","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing the biological behavior of uterine inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) remains challenging. This study evaluated previously proposed risk schemes and features in 9 IMTs (6 indolent, 3 aggressive) by integrating clinicopathological features, immunohistochemistry, and next-generation sequencing (NGS). High-risk features (necrosis, infiltrative growth, nuclear atypia) were present in both groups, with LVSI in 1/3 of aggressive IMTs. Aberrant p16 expression and CDKN2A/2B deletions were noted in 2/3 aggressive cases. All cases harbored ALK fusions, wild-type p53, and lacked pathogenic gene mutations. Aggressive cases harbored arm-level and segmental copy number gains/losses at chr 1, 2, X, and had significantly reduced AR expression. The clinicopathological risk stratification score (CRSS) predicted the biological behavior correctly in cases with complete clinicopathological data (size, mitoses, age, infiltrative growth). Two morcellated cases (one indolent and one aggressive) would have been predicted as low risk based solely on the absence of pathogenic mutations. Hereby, the reliability of the proposed CRSS was confirmed. Aberrant p16 expression predicted malignant behavior in 2/3 aggressive cases. Absence of pathogenic mutations or presence of large scale CNVs does not seem to be a predictor of clinical behavior. Additional studies and NGS analyses of more cases may improve risk stratification for patients with incomplete clinicopathological information and may reveal additional risk stratifiers (such as the suggested large-scale CNVs or AR downregulation) for IMTs.
结合临床病理和分子数据评估子宫炎性肌成纤维细胞肿瘤的生物学行为
评估子宫炎性肌纤维母细胞瘤(IMTs)的生物学行为仍然具有挑战性。本研究通过整合临床病理特征、免疫组织化学和下一代测序(NGS),评估了先前提出的9例IMTs(6例惰性,3例侵袭性)的风险方案和特征。两组均存在高危特征(坏死、浸润性生长、核异型),1/3侵袭性imt伴LVSI。2/3侵袭性病例存在p16异常表达和CDKN2A/2B缺失。所有病例均含有ALK融合,野生型p53,缺乏致病性基因突变。侵袭性病例在第1、2、X期出现臂位和节段拷贝数增加/减少,AR表达显著降低。临床病理风险分层评分(CRSS)在临床病理资料(大小、有丝分裂、年龄、浸润性生长)完整的病例中正确预测生物学行为。两个碎裂病例(一个是惰性的,一个是侵袭性的)仅根据没有致病突变就被预测为低风险。从而验证了所提出的CRSS的可靠性。2/3侵袭性病例中p16表达异常预示恶性行为。缺乏致病性突变或大规模CNVs的存在似乎并不是临床行为的预测因子。更多病例的进一步研究和NGS分析可能会改善临床病理信息不完整患者的风险分层,并可能揭示imt的其他风险分层(如建议的大规模CNVs或AR下调)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
405
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Pathology, Research and Practice provides accessible coverage of the most recent developments across the entire field of pathology: Reviews focus on recent progress in pathology, while Comments look at interesting current problems and at hypotheses for future developments in pathology. Original Papers present novel findings on all aspects of general, anatomic and molecular pathology. Rapid Communications inform readers on preliminary findings that may be relevant for further studies and need to be communicated quickly. Teaching Cases look at new aspects or special diagnostic problems of diseases and at case reports relevant for the pathologist''s practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信