{"title":"Dynamically allocated individual pitch control for fatigue load reduction in wind turbines","authors":"Kazi Mohsin, Mohammad Odeh, Tri Ngo, Tuhin Das","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2025.106357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article presents multivariable control designs to improve performance and reduce fatigue loads in wind turbines using torque control, Collective Pitch Control (CPC), and Individual Pitch Control (IPC). Two multi-input, multi-output (MIMO) control structures are proposed in this study. The first approach uses force distribution on blades to design the IPC, while the second uses the Relative Gain Array (RGA), which quantifies the level of interactions between inputs and outputs, to design the IPC. Both approaches use the same torque control and CPC. This work emphasizes the second approach, i.e., the RGA-based IPC. A novel aspect of this approach is the dynamic allocation of IPC, which refers to the change in the input–output pairing as a function of the rotor azimuth angle. The frequency-dependent characteristics of this allocation facilitate fatigue load reduction at targeted frequencies. Extensive simulations show that the RGA-based IPC controller outperforms the first controller in reducing cyclic loads on the blade root bending moment, tower side-to-side, and tower fore-aft bending moments at the frequencies of interest. Moreover, it has no detrimental effects on the rotor speed and power generation, which are regulated by the CPC and torque controller. A Control-oriented, Reconfigurable, and Acausal Floating Turbine Simulator (CRAFTS), developed in-house, is used for design, implementation, and evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50615,"journal":{"name":"Control Engineering Practice","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 106357"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066125001200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article presents multivariable control designs to improve performance and reduce fatigue loads in wind turbines using torque control, Collective Pitch Control (CPC), and Individual Pitch Control (IPC). Two multi-input, multi-output (MIMO) control structures are proposed in this study. The first approach uses force distribution on blades to design the IPC, while the second uses the Relative Gain Array (RGA), which quantifies the level of interactions between inputs and outputs, to design the IPC. Both approaches use the same torque control and CPC. This work emphasizes the second approach, i.e., the RGA-based IPC. A novel aspect of this approach is the dynamic allocation of IPC, which refers to the change in the input–output pairing as a function of the rotor azimuth angle. The frequency-dependent characteristics of this allocation facilitate fatigue load reduction at targeted frequencies. Extensive simulations show that the RGA-based IPC controller outperforms the first controller in reducing cyclic loads on the blade root bending moment, tower side-to-side, and tower fore-aft bending moments at the frequencies of interest. Moreover, it has no detrimental effects on the rotor speed and power generation, which are regulated by the CPC and torque controller. A Control-oriented, Reconfigurable, and Acausal Floating Turbine Simulator (CRAFTS), developed in-house, is used for design, implementation, and evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Control Engineering Practice strives to meet the needs of industrial practitioners and industrially related academics and researchers. It publishes papers which illustrate the direct application of control theory and its supporting tools in all possible areas of automation. As a result, the journal only contains papers which can be considered to have made significant contributions to the application of advanced control techniques. It is normally expected that practical results should be included, but where simulation only studies are available, it is necessary to demonstrate that the simulation model is representative of a genuine application. Strictly theoretical papers will find a more appropriate home in Control Engineering Practice''s sister publication, Automatica. It is also expected that papers are innovative with respect to the state of the art and are sufficiently detailed for a reader to be able to duplicate the main results of the paper (supplementary material, including datasets, tables, code and any relevant interactive material can be made available and downloaded from the website). The benefits of the presented methods must be made very clear and the new techniques must be compared and contrasted with results obtained using existing methods. Moreover, a thorough analysis of failures that may happen in the design process and implementation can also be part of the paper.
The scope of Control Engineering Practice matches the activities of IFAC.
Papers demonstrating the contribution of automation and control in improving the performance, quality, productivity, sustainability, resource and energy efficiency, and the manageability of systems and processes for the benefit of mankind and are relevant to industrial practitioners are most welcome.