{"title":"Effects of acute stress on executive functions in depression, generalised anxiety and borderline personality disorder","authors":"T.M. Scott , Joanne M. Dickson","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2025.100917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Acute stress adaptively alters executive functions (EFs) essential for emotion regulation. Emerging systems of psychiatric classification, such as the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) and the Research Domain Criteria, emphasise the underlying mechanisms and dimensional nature of psychopathology. Distress disorders—a subfactor within the HiTOP model including major depressive disorder, generalised anxiety disorder and borderline personality disorder—are characterised by altered stress reactivity, impaired emotion regulation, and modest responsiveness to first-line psychotherapies. This systematic review sought to examine whether distress disorders and their related symptoms confer heightened vulnerability to transient EF impairment under conditions of acute stress.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search of articles published in ProQuest, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science prior to December 31st, 2022 identified 17 suitable studies examining stress-induced alterations to working memory, inhibition and cognitive flexibility in the context of distress disorders and associated symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This review found a heightened susceptibility to stress-induced impairment of working memory in depression, and of response inhibition in borderline personality disorder—even for sub-clinical presentations of depressive symptoms wherein diagnostic criteria for a depressive disorder were not met. Findings for cognitive flexibility were inconclusive.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>While a thorough systematic review was conducted, heterogeneity in study design and methodologies precluded inclusion of a meta-analysis<em>.</em></div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings indicate that altered stress reactivity leads to maladaptation of EF under acute stress, and subsequent disruption of adaptive emotion regulation strategies. The present finding may help account for non-responsiveness among therapeutic interventions predicated upon cognitively-demanding emotion regulation strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100917"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915325000472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Acute stress adaptively alters executive functions (EFs) essential for emotion regulation. Emerging systems of psychiatric classification, such as the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) and the Research Domain Criteria, emphasise the underlying mechanisms and dimensional nature of psychopathology. Distress disorders—a subfactor within the HiTOP model including major depressive disorder, generalised anxiety disorder and borderline personality disorder—are characterised by altered stress reactivity, impaired emotion regulation, and modest responsiveness to first-line psychotherapies. This systematic review sought to examine whether distress disorders and their related symptoms confer heightened vulnerability to transient EF impairment under conditions of acute stress.
Methods
A comprehensive search of articles published in ProQuest, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science prior to December 31st, 2022 identified 17 suitable studies examining stress-induced alterations to working memory, inhibition and cognitive flexibility in the context of distress disorders and associated symptoms.
Results
This review found a heightened susceptibility to stress-induced impairment of working memory in depression, and of response inhibition in borderline personality disorder—even for sub-clinical presentations of depressive symptoms wherein diagnostic criteria for a depressive disorder were not met. Findings for cognitive flexibility were inconclusive.
Limitations
While a thorough systematic review was conducted, heterogeneity in study design and methodologies precluded inclusion of a meta-analysis.
Conclusions
The findings indicate that altered stress reactivity leads to maladaptation of EF under acute stress, and subsequent disruption of adaptive emotion regulation strategies. The present finding may help account for non-responsiveness among therapeutic interventions predicated upon cognitively-demanding emotion regulation strategies.
急性应激适应性地改变执行功能(EFs)对情绪调节至关重要。新兴的精神病学分类系统,如精神病理学层次分类法(HiTOP)和研究领域标准,强调精神病理学的潜在机制和维度性质。痛苦障碍是HiTOP模型中的一个子因素,包括重度抑郁症、广泛性焦虑症和边缘性人格障碍,其特征是压力反应改变,情绪调节受损,对一线心理治疗反应迟钝。本系统综述旨在研究在急性应激条件下,应激障碍及其相关症状是否会增加短暂性EF损伤的易感性。方法对2022年12月31日之前发表在ProQuest、PsycINFO、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science上的文章进行全面检索,确定了17项合适的研究,这些研究考察了压力引起的工作记忆、抑制和认知灵活性的改变在痛苦障碍和相关症状的背景下。结果本综述发现,抑郁症患者和边缘型人格障碍患者对压力诱发的工作记忆损伤和反应抑制的易感性增高,甚至对未达到抑郁症诊断标准的亚临床表现的抑郁症状也是如此。认知灵活性的研究结果尚无定论。虽然进行了彻底的系统评价,但研究设计和方法的异质性排除了纳入荟萃分析的可能性。结论应激反应性的改变导致急性应激下EF的不适应,并导致适应性情绪调节策略的破坏。目前的发现可能有助于解释基于认知要求的情绪调节策略的治疗干预中的非反应性。