Benjamin Bay,Richard Tanner,Michael Gao,Angelo Oliva,Samantha Sartori,Birgit Vogel,Mauro Gitto,Kenneth F Smith,Francesca Maria Di Muro,Amit Hooda,Joseph Sweeny,Parasuram Krishnamoorthy,Pedro Moreno,Prakash Krishnan,George Dangas,Annapoorna Kini,Samin K Sharma,Roxana Mehran
{"title":"Residual cholesterol and inflammatory risk in statin-treated patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention†.","authors":"Benjamin Bay,Richard Tanner,Michael Gao,Angelo Oliva,Samantha Sartori,Birgit Vogel,Mauro Gitto,Kenneth F Smith,Francesca Maria Di Muro,Amit Hooda,Joseph Sweeny,Parasuram Krishnamoorthy,Pedro Moreno,Prakash Krishnan,George Dangas,Annapoorna Kini,Samin K Sharma,Roxana Mehran","doi":"10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND AIMS\r\nElevated LDL-cholesterol levels and inflammation, as assessed by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, correlate with cardiovascular risk. However, data on the relative impact of residual LDL-cholesterol and inflammatory risk among statin-treated patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is lacking. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the impact of residual cholesterol/inflammatory risk in patients on statin therapy undergoing PCI.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nFrom 2012 to 2022, patients at a tertiary centre undergoing PCI were analysed. Patients were stratified according to LDL-cholesterol (≥70 vs <70 mg/dL) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (≥2 vs <2 mg/L) levels: no residual cholesterol or inflammatory risk, residual cholesterol risk, residual inflammatory risk, and combined residual cholesterol and inflammatory risk. Patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction, cancer, no statin treatment at admission, or high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels >10 mg/L were excluded. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, spontaneous myocardial infarction, and stroke 1 year after the index PCI.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 15 494 patients were included. After 1-year follow-up, individuals with isolated residual inflammatory risk had the highest MACE rate (5.1%), followed by patients with combined cholesterol and inflammatory risk, no residual risk, and isolated residual cholesterol risk. After multivariable Cox regression analysis, patients with residual inflammatory risk had a 1.8-fold higher risk for MACE (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.36-2.33, P < .001) compared with those with no residual cholesterol or inflammatory risk. This was similar in patients with combined residual cholesterol and inflammatory risk (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.19-2.04, P = 0.001). Of note, no independent association of isolated residual cholesterol risk (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.01, 95% confidence interval .76-1.35, P-value = .920) with MACE was noted (P-trend across all groups <.001).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nAmong statin-treated patients undergoing PCI, residual inflammation but not cholesterol risk was associated with an increased risk of MACE during follow-up.","PeriodicalId":11976,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":37.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf196","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Elevated LDL-cholesterol levels and inflammation, as assessed by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, correlate with cardiovascular risk. However, data on the relative impact of residual LDL-cholesterol and inflammatory risk among statin-treated patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is lacking. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the impact of residual cholesterol/inflammatory risk in patients on statin therapy undergoing PCI.
METHODS
From 2012 to 2022, patients at a tertiary centre undergoing PCI were analysed. Patients were stratified according to LDL-cholesterol (≥70 vs <70 mg/dL) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (≥2 vs <2 mg/L) levels: no residual cholesterol or inflammatory risk, residual cholesterol risk, residual inflammatory risk, and combined residual cholesterol and inflammatory risk. Patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction, cancer, no statin treatment at admission, or high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels >10 mg/L were excluded. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, spontaneous myocardial infarction, and stroke 1 year after the index PCI.
RESULTS
A total of 15 494 patients were included. After 1-year follow-up, individuals with isolated residual inflammatory risk had the highest MACE rate (5.1%), followed by patients with combined cholesterol and inflammatory risk, no residual risk, and isolated residual cholesterol risk. After multivariable Cox regression analysis, patients with residual inflammatory risk had a 1.8-fold higher risk for MACE (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.36-2.33, P < .001) compared with those with no residual cholesterol or inflammatory risk. This was similar in patients with combined residual cholesterol and inflammatory risk (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.19-2.04, P = 0.001). Of note, no independent association of isolated residual cholesterol risk (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.01, 95% confidence interval .76-1.35, P-value = .920) with MACE was noted (P-trend across all groups <.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Among statin-treated patients undergoing PCI, residual inflammation but not cholesterol risk was associated with an increased risk of MACE during follow-up.
期刊介绍:
The European Heart Journal is a renowned international journal that focuses on cardiovascular medicine. It is published weekly and is the official journal of the European Society of Cardiology. This peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing high-quality clinical and scientific material pertaining to all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. It covers a diverse range of topics including research findings, technical evaluations, and reviews. Moreover, the journal serves as a platform for the exchange of information and discussions on various aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including educational matters.
In addition to original papers on cardiovascular medicine and surgery, the European Heart Journal also presents reviews, clinical perspectives, ESC Guidelines, and editorial articles that highlight recent advancements in cardiology. Additionally, the journal actively encourages readers to share their thoughts and opinions through correspondence.