{"title":"Across 33 broad‐leaved deciduous woody species, silicon enhances leaf lamina stiffness but not tensile strength whereas cellulose enhances both","authors":"Hirofumi Kajino, Yusuke Onoda, Kaoru Kitajima","doi":"10.1111/nph.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary<jats:list list-type=\"bullet\"> <jats:list-item>Silicon (Si) has been hypothesized to be a metabolically cheaper substitute for carbon‐based cell wall components to support leaves. However, how the biomechanical function of Si, deposited as amorphous silica, differs from cell wall components remains untested. Here, we tested the hypothesis that species with higher leaf Si concentrations have stiffer but more brittle leaf lamina.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>We measured the mechanical properties, including modulus of elasticity (<jats:italic>E</jats:italic>), tensile strength (<jats:italic>σ</jats:italic><jats:sub>max</jats:sub>), and maximum strain (<jats:italic>ε</jats:italic><jats:sub>max</jats:sub>), tissue density, and the concentrations of Si and cell wall components for 33 deciduous broad‐leaved woody species.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Multiple regression results showed that tissue density, Si concentration, and cellulose concentration contributed positively to <jats:italic>E</jats:italic> and negatively to <jats:italic>ε</jats:italic><jats:sub>max</jats:sub>. By contrast, tissue density and cellulose concentration, but not Si concentration, contributed to <jats:italic>σ</jats:italic><jats:sub>max</jats:sub>. No significant contribution of lignin concentration to mechanical properties was detected.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>These results suggest that Si might function as a substitute for cellulose to increase stiffness but not the strength of a lamina. Greater Si concentration decreased <jats:italic>ε</jats:italic><jats:sub>max</jats:sub> without increasing <jats:italic>σ</jats:italic><jats:sub>max</jats:sub>, which made the lamina more brittle. The brittleness associated with Si might explain a potential cost or disadvantage of using Si, which would elucidate the trade‐offs between species with different leaf Si concentrations.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70079","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
SummarySilicon (Si) has been hypothesized to be a metabolically cheaper substitute for carbon‐based cell wall components to support leaves. However, how the biomechanical function of Si, deposited as amorphous silica, differs from cell wall components remains untested. Here, we tested the hypothesis that species with higher leaf Si concentrations have stiffer but more brittle leaf lamina.We measured the mechanical properties, including modulus of elasticity (E), tensile strength (σmax), and maximum strain (εmax), tissue density, and the concentrations of Si and cell wall components for 33 deciduous broad‐leaved woody species.Multiple regression results showed that tissue density, Si concentration, and cellulose concentration contributed positively to E and negatively to εmax. By contrast, tissue density and cellulose concentration, but not Si concentration, contributed to σmax. No significant contribution of lignin concentration to mechanical properties was detected.These results suggest that Si might function as a substitute for cellulose to increase stiffness but not the strength of a lamina. Greater Si concentration decreased εmax without increasing σmax, which made the lamina more brittle. The brittleness associated with Si might explain a potential cost or disadvantage of using Si, which would elucidate the trade‐offs between species with different leaf Si concentrations.
期刊介绍:
New Phytologist is an international electronic journal published 24 times a year. It is owned by the New Phytologist Foundation, a non-profit-making charitable organization dedicated to promoting plant science. The journal publishes excellent, novel, rigorous, and timely research and scholarship in plant science and its applications. The articles cover topics in five sections: Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology. These sections encompass intracellular processes, global environmental change, and encourage cross-disciplinary approaches. The journal recognizes the use of techniques from molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches in plant science. Abstracting and Indexing Information for New Phytologist includes Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Agroforestry Abstracts, Biochemistry & Biophysics Citation Index, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Environment Index, Global Health, and Plant Breeding Abstracts, and others.