Efficacy and safety of methotrexate in osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Weikiat Wong,Yucheng Huang,Nattaya Wichienwantana,Hailiang Sun,Jian Pang,Ying Shi
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of methotrexate in osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Weikiat Wong,Yucheng Huang,Nattaya Wichienwantana,Hailiang Sun,Jian Pang,Ying Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.joca.2025.02.786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of methotrexate (MTX) for osteoarthritis (OA).\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nA systematic search of databases and clinical trial registers was conducted in September 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MTX with placebo. The evaluation focused on OA symptoms, including pain and function; quality of life; safety and OA-related biomarkers (biochemical and imaging markers). Meta-analysis and the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) were utilized to determine statistical and clinical significance. The risk of bias and certainty assessment were evaluated using the RoB 1 tool, the RoB-ME tool, and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group (GRADE) framework.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nSix RCTs involving 602 participants were included, all with a low risk of bias. Compared to the placebo, MTX significantly relieved pain (SMD, -0.44; 95% CI, -0.67 to -0.20, P = 0.0003) in patients with OA (knee and hand). Functional improvement with MTX was observed only in patients with knee OA (WMD, -7.36; 95% CI, -14.34 to -0.38, P = 0.045), while not observed in those with hand OA (WMD, -0.70; 95% CI, -2.52 to 1.12, P = 0.45). The point estimates did not exceed the MCID of each scale, suggesting the possible clinical significance of the findings. No differences were observed for quality-of-life outcome (SMD, -0.74; 95% CI, -153 to 0.05, P = 0.07). Besides, MTX did not significantly increase the incidence of adverse events (AEs) compared to placebo (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.02, P = 0.09).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nMethotrexate can alleviate pain in patients with osteoarthritis and improve functional recovery in knee OA without raising safety concerns.","PeriodicalId":19654,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2025.02.786","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of methotrexate (MTX) for osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN A systematic search of databases and clinical trial registers was conducted in September 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MTX with placebo. The evaluation focused on OA symptoms, including pain and function; quality of life; safety and OA-related biomarkers (biochemical and imaging markers). Meta-analysis and the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) were utilized to determine statistical and clinical significance. The risk of bias and certainty assessment were evaluated using the RoB 1 tool, the RoB-ME tool, and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group (GRADE) framework. RESULTS Six RCTs involving 602 participants were included, all with a low risk of bias. Compared to the placebo, MTX significantly relieved pain (SMD, -0.44; 95% CI, -0.67 to -0.20, P = 0.0003) in patients with OA (knee and hand). Functional improvement with MTX was observed only in patients with knee OA (WMD, -7.36; 95% CI, -14.34 to -0.38, P = 0.045), while not observed in those with hand OA (WMD, -0.70; 95% CI, -2.52 to 1.12, P = 0.45). The point estimates did not exceed the MCID of each scale, suggesting the possible clinical significance of the findings. No differences were observed for quality-of-life outcome (SMD, -0.74; 95% CI, -153 to 0.05, P = 0.07). Besides, MTX did not significantly increase the incidence of adverse events (AEs) compared to placebo (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.02, P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS Methotrexate can alleviate pain in patients with osteoarthritis and improve functional recovery in knee OA without raising safety concerns.
甲氨蝶呤治疗骨关节炎的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的评价甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗骨关节炎(OA)的疗效和安全性。DESIGNA于2024年9月对数据库和临床试验注册库进行了系统检索,以确定比较MTX和安慰剂的随机对照试验(rct)。评估侧重于OA症状,包括疼痛和功能;生活质量;安全性和oa相关生物标志物(生化和成像标志物)。采用荟萃分析和最小临床重要差异(MCID)来确定统计学和临床意义。使用RoB 1工具、RoB- me工具和推荐、评估、发展和评估工作组(GRADE)框架评估偏倚风险和确定性评估。结果纳入6项随机对照试验,共602名受试者,均为低偏倚风险。与安慰剂相比,MTX显著缓解疼痛(SMD, -0.44;OA患者(膝关节和手部)的95% CI, -0.67至-0.20,P = 0.0003。MTX仅在膝关节OA患者中观察到功能改善(WMD, -7.36;95% CI, -14.34 ~ -0.38, P = 0.045),而在手OA患者中未观察到(WMD, -0.70;95% CI, -2.52 ~ 1.12, P = 0.45)。点估计值没有超过每个量表的MCID,提示研究结果可能具有临床意义。在生活质量结局方面没有观察到差异(SMD, -0.74;95% CI, -153 ~ 0.05, P = 0.07)。此外,与安慰剂相比,MTX没有显著增加不良事件(ae)的发生率(RR, 0.88;95% CI, 0.75 ~ 1.02, P = 0.09)。结论甲氨蝶呤可减轻骨关节炎患者的疼痛,改善膝关节OA患者的功能恢复,且无安全性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
802
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Osteoarthritis and Cartilage is the official journal of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International. It is an international, multidisciplinary journal that disseminates information for the many kinds of specialists and practitioners concerned with osteoarthritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信