A Randomized Controlled Trial of Video-Assisted Electronic Consent Versus Standard Consent for Percutaneous Kidney Biopsy.

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Pedro H Franca Gois,Vera Y Miao,Rebecca B Saunderson,Marina Wainstein,Julia Jefferis,Rebecca Hudson,Shaun Chandler,Kylie-Ann Mallitt,Martin Wolley,Belinda Elford,Ann Bonner,Helen G Healy
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial of Video-Assisted Electronic Consent Versus Standard Consent for Percutaneous Kidney Biopsy.","authors":"Pedro H Franca Gois,Vera Y Miao,Rebecca B Saunderson,Marina Wainstein,Julia Jefferis,Rebecca Hudson,Shaun Chandler,Kylie-Ann Mallitt,Martin Wolley,Belinda Elford,Ann Bonner,Helen G Healy","doi":"10.2215/cjn.0000000702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nInformed consent is crucial in healthcare, as it respects and honors patient autonomy. However, the process of consenting a patient to a procedure or intervention is often unstandardized, leading to gaps in comprehension, which in turn affects decision-making. This study aimed to assess the patient-reported benefits of video-assisted electronic consent (eConsent) compared with the usual consent practices for percutaneous kidney biopsies (PKB).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn this single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial, consecutive patients undergoing PKB between July 2021 and January 2024 were randomized (1:1) to either video-assisted eConsent (intervention) or usual practice of consent (control). The intervention group accessed an eight-minute explanatory animation on an online platform covering the procedure, its risks, and pre- and post-biopsy care before providing digital consent. The control group was consented to by clinicians in the usual manner and signed a paper form. The primary outcome was questionnaire-based patient comprehension, with secondary outcomes including patient-reported experience, anxiety, and satisfaction with the consent process.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 178 eligible patients, 120 were enrolled (60 in each group), with a median age of 52 (IQR 34-65) years, 56% were female, and 59% had less than 12 years of education. Comprehension scores were significantly higher in the eConsent group, with participants answering on average three more questions correctly out of nine compared to the control group (p<0.001). Comprehension did not differ significantly by sex or education level, but younger patients scored higher. The eConsent group also had better comprehension of pre- and post-PKB care. No significant differences were observed in patient-reported experience, anxiety, or satisfaction between groups.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nVideo-assisted eConsent improves patient comprehension of PKB compared to usual consent practice without affecting patient experience, anxiety, or satisfaction.\r\n\r\nTRIAL REGISTRATION\r\nAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000768897).","PeriodicalId":50681,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology","volume":"31 9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.0000000702","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Informed consent is crucial in healthcare, as it respects and honors patient autonomy. However, the process of consenting a patient to a procedure or intervention is often unstandardized, leading to gaps in comprehension, which in turn affects decision-making. This study aimed to assess the patient-reported benefits of video-assisted electronic consent (eConsent) compared with the usual consent practices for percutaneous kidney biopsies (PKB). METHODS In this single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial, consecutive patients undergoing PKB between July 2021 and January 2024 were randomized (1:1) to either video-assisted eConsent (intervention) or usual practice of consent (control). The intervention group accessed an eight-minute explanatory animation on an online platform covering the procedure, its risks, and pre- and post-biopsy care before providing digital consent. The control group was consented to by clinicians in the usual manner and signed a paper form. The primary outcome was questionnaire-based patient comprehension, with secondary outcomes including patient-reported experience, anxiety, and satisfaction with the consent process. RESULTS Of 178 eligible patients, 120 were enrolled (60 in each group), with a median age of 52 (IQR 34-65) years, 56% were female, and 59% had less than 12 years of education. Comprehension scores were significantly higher in the eConsent group, with participants answering on average three more questions correctly out of nine compared to the control group (p<0.001). Comprehension did not differ significantly by sex or education level, but younger patients scored higher. The eConsent group also had better comprehension of pre- and post-PKB care. No significant differences were observed in patient-reported experience, anxiety, or satisfaction between groups. CONCLUSIONS Video-assisted eConsent improves patient comprehension of PKB compared to usual consent practice without affecting patient experience, anxiety, or satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000768897).
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology strives to establish itself as the foremost authority in communicating and influencing advances in clinical nephrology by (1) swiftly and effectively disseminating pivotal developments in clinical and translational research in nephrology, encompassing innovations in research methods and care delivery; (2) providing context for these advances in relation to future research directions and patient care; and (3) becoming a key voice on issues with potential implications for the clinical practice of nephrology, particularly within the United States. Original manuscript topics cover a range of areas, including Acid/Base and Electrolyte Disorders, Acute Kidney Injury and ICU Nephrology, Chronic Kidney Disease, Clinical Nephrology, Cystic Kidney Disease, Diabetes and the Kidney, Genetics, Geriatric and Palliative Nephrology, Glomerular and Tubulointerstitial Diseases, Hypertension, Maintenance Dialysis, Mineral Metabolism, Nephrolithiasis, and Transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信