Generalized Ordinal Regression Models for Seismic Fragility Analysis

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Libo Chen
{"title":"Generalized Ordinal Regression Models for Seismic Fragility Analysis","authors":"Libo Chen","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study investigates the application of ordinal regression models in seismic fragility curve modeling, providing a flexible alternative to the traditional log-normal distribution function. A comparative analysis is conducted among various ordinal regression approaches, including the traditional Cumulative model as well as alternative methods like Sequential and Adjacent Category models, along with extensions that account for category-specific effects and heteroscedasticity. These models are applied to bridge damage data from the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, using both frequentist and Bayesian inference methods. Model diagnostics, including surrogate residuals, are performed to assess model fit and performance. A total of eleven models are examined, from basic forms to those incorporating category-specific effects and variance heterogeneity. The Sequential model with category-specific effects, rigorously evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation, outperforms the traditional Cumulative probit model. The findings highlight significant differences in the predicted damage probabilities, emphasizing the potential of more flexible fragility curve modeling techniques to improve seismic risk assessments. This study underscores the importance of ongoing evaluation and refinement of modeling techniques to enhance the predictive accuracy and applicability of seismic fragility models in performance-based earthquake engineering.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 6","pages":"1717-1736"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4332","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the application of ordinal regression models in seismic fragility curve modeling, providing a flexible alternative to the traditional log-normal distribution function. A comparative analysis is conducted among various ordinal regression approaches, including the traditional Cumulative model as well as alternative methods like Sequential and Adjacent Category models, along with extensions that account for category-specific effects and heteroscedasticity. These models are applied to bridge damage data from the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, using both frequentist and Bayesian inference methods. Model diagnostics, including surrogate residuals, are performed to assess model fit and performance. A total of eleven models are examined, from basic forms to those incorporating category-specific effects and variance heterogeneity. The Sequential model with category-specific effects, rigorously evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation, outperforms the traditional Cumulative probit model. The findings highlight significant differences in the predicted damage probabilities, emphasizing the potential of more flexible fragility curve modeling techniques to improve seismic risk assessments. This study underscores the importance of ongoing evaluation and refinement of modeling techniques to enhance the predictive accuracy and applicability of seismic fragility models in performance-based earthquake engineering.

地震易损性分析的广义有序回归模型
本文研究了序回归模型在地震易损性曲线建模中的应用,为传统的对数正态分布函数提供了一种灵活的替代方法。比较分析了各种有序回归方法,包括传统的累积模型,以及序列和相邻类别模型等替代方法,以及考虑类别特定效应和异方差的扩展。将这些模型应用于2008年汶川地震的桥梁损伤数据中,采用了频率论和贝叶斯推理方法。模型诊断,包括替代残差,用于评估模型拟合和性能。从基本形式到纳入类别特定效应和方差异质性的模型,共检查了11个模型。具有类别特定效应的序列模型,使用留一交叉验证进行严格评估,优于传统的累积概率模型。研究结果强调了预测破坏概率的显著差异,强调了更灵活的脆弱性曲线建模技术改善地震风险评估的潜力。这项研究强调了持续评估和改进建模技术的重要性,以提高地震易损性模型在基于性能的地震工程中的预测精度和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信