Understanding the Effects of Gender Equality on Company's Performance: A Global Mid-Cap Companies' Perspective

IF 2.7 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Rekha Dahiya, Asjad Usmani, Arvind Kumar
{"title":"Understanding the Effects of Gender Equality on Company's Performance: A Global Mid-Cap Companies' Perspective","authors":"Rekha Dahiya,&nbsp;Asjad Usmani,&nbsp;Arvind Kumar","doi":"10.1002/pa.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The present study is conceived with the objective of assessing gender equality measures in mid-cap corporations and analysing the influence on company's performance. Based on gender equality scores of top 50 companies from Equileap's 2022 gender equality list; financial performance data from annual reports; and corporate responsibility scores from Sustainalytics, this study reveals that mid-cap companies fared poorly on all gender equality metrics and does not completely embrace gender equality. Less than 50% of women directors are found on the boards of 70% of mid-cap corporations. Women represented only 42% of company board of directors' positions and 32% of the executive leadership positions. A mean pay gap of 13.54% is observed in 85% of the mid-cap companies. Gender equality accounted for 26% variation in the mid-cap firms' financial performance. Initiatives to promote gender equality though do not affect the responsible behaviour of the mid-cap firms. Novelty of the study lies in testing the gender equality claims of mid-cap companies labelled as ‘top gender equal’ organisations across different sectors and ascertaining the influence of board's gender equality on firm's financial performance and responsible behaviour. The study makes a unique contribution to gender equality literature by proving that financial indicators are not enough to motivate corporate to truly embrace gender equality. Neither aspect like flexible working, training and work–life balance can be projected as the only measures for solving the issue of gender inequality. Results also contribute to social justification theory's literature by highlighting the fact that the theory promotes the ‘social stability’ or ‘status quo’ more than advancing the ‘social change’ when applied in the context of gender equality.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Affairs","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pa.70028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study is conceived with the objective of assessing gender equality measures in mid-cap corporations and analysing the influence on company's performance. Based on gender equality scores of top 50 companies from Equileap's 2022 gender equality list; financial performance data from annual reports; and corporate responsibility scores from Sustainalytics, this study reveals that mid-cap companies fared poorly on all gender equality metrics and does not completely embrace gender equality. Less than 50% of women directors are found on the boards of 70% of mid-cap corporations. Women represented only 42% of company board of directors' positions and 32% of the executive leadership positions. A mean pay gap of 13.54% is observed in 85% of the mid-cap companies. Gender equality accounted for 26% variation in the mid-cap firms' financial performance. Initiatives to promote gender equality though do not affect the responsible behaviour of the mid-cap firms. Novelty of the study lies in testing the gender equality claims of mid-cap companies labelled as ‘top gender equal’ organisations across different sectors and ascertaining the influence of board's gender equality on firm's financial performance and responsible behaviour. The study makes a unique contribution to gender equality literature by proving that financial indicators are not enough to motivate corporate to truly embrace gender equality. Neither aspect like flexible working, training and work–life balance can be projected as the only measures for solving the issue of gender inequality. Results also contribute to social justification theory's literature by highlighting the fact that the theory promotes the ‘social stability’ or ‘status quo’ more than advancing the ‘social change’ when applied in the context of gender equality.

了解性别平等对公司业绩的影响:全球中等市值公司的视角
本研究的目的是评估中型企业的性别平等措施,并分析其对公司绩效的影响。根据Equileap 2022年性别平等榜单中排名前50位的公司的性别平等得分;年度报告中的财务业绩数据;和Sustainalytics的企业责任评分,这项研究表明,中型股公司在所有性别平等指标上都表现不佳,并且没有完全接受性别平等。在70%的中型企业的董事会中,女性董事的比例不到50%。女性仅占公司董事会职位的42%,占行政领导职位的32%。在85%的中型股公司中,平均薪酬差距为13.54%。性别平等在中型公司的财务表现中占26%的差异。然而,促进性别平等的举措并不影响中型企业的负责任行为。该研究的新颖之处在于测试了被称为“顶级性别平等”组织的中型公司在不同行业的性别平等声明,并确定了董事会性别平等对公司财务绩效和负责任行为的影响。该研究通过证明财务指标不足以激励企业真正拥抱性别平等,为性别平等文献做出了独特的贡献。灵活工作、培训和工作与生活平衡等方面都不能作为解决性别不平等问题的唯一措施。研究结果还有助于社会辩护理论的文献,强调当应用于性别平等的背景下,该理论促进“社会稳定”或“现状”,而不是推进“社会变革”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Affairs
Journal of Public Affairs PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Affairs provides an international forum for refereed papers, case studies and reviews on the latest developments, practice and thinking in government relations, public affairs, and political marketing. The Journal is guided by the twin objectives of publishing submissions of the utmost relevance to the day-to-day practice of communication specialists, and promoting the highest standards of intellectual rigour.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信