Grouped and Vibrating: The Influence of Group Size, Triggering Stimuli, and Leg Loss in Bobbing in an Arachnid

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Ethology Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1111/eth.13551
Damián Villaseñor-Amador, Ignacio Escalante
{"title":"Grouped and Vibrating: The Influence of Group Size, Triggering Stimuli, and Leg Loss in Bobbing in an Arachnid","authors":"Damián Villaseñor-Amador,&nbsp;Ignacio Escalante","doi":"10.1111/eth.13551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Animals across taxa form aggregations, with increased defenses as one of the benefits. Some defensive behaviors of grouped animals involve body movements. However, how those behaviors are triggered varies, and how between-individual morphological variation affects them remains unknown. In this project, we explored three drivers of bobbing—an up-and-down body vibration behavior assumed to be a defensive response—with field observations and a lab experiment in one species of the arachnid order Opiliones (<i>Prionostemma</i> sp.2). First, we explored the variation in bobbing duration across groups of a variable number of individuals, as animals could modulate their engagement in this behavior to ensure a successful predator-deterrent behavior. We found that the duration of bobbing increased with group size. Second, we explored the effect of different triggering stimuli that might represent natural scenarios of an approaching predator. We found that a touching stimulus (gentle stick touching) triggered longer bobbing than an airflow stimulus (gentle blow). Third, we explored if the individuals' leg condition (whether they had all eight or fewer legs when found) affects their engagement in this behavior. We found that variations in leg condition did not affect their defensive engagement, as bobbing duration was similar between intact individuals and those missing legs. Together, these data provide novel observational and experimental insights into the drivers of collective behavior in animals. While individual variation in morphological conditions does not affect bobbing in these understudied arachnids, variability in group size and the triggering stimuli impacted their engagement in movement behavioral defenses.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":"131 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.13551","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.13551","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animals across taxa form aggregations, with increased defenses as one of the benefits. Some defensive behaviors of grouped animals involve body movements. However, how those behaviors are triggered varies, and how between-individual morphological variation affects them remains unknown. In this project, we explored three drivers of bobbing—an up-and-down body vibration behavior assumed to be a defensive response—with field observations and a lab experiment in one species of the arachnid order Opiliones (Prionostemma sp.2). First, we explored the variation in bobbing duration across groups of a variable number of individuals, as animals could modulate their engagement in this behavior to ensure a successful predator-deterrent behavior. We found that the duration of bobbing increased with group size. Second, we explored the effect of different triggering stimuli that might represent natural scenarios of an approaching predator. We found that a touching stimulus (gentle stick touching) triggered longer bobbing than an airflow stimulus (gentle blow). Third, we explored if the individuals' leg condition (whether they had all eight or fewer legs when found) affects their engagement in this behavior. We found that variations in leg condition did not affect their defensive engagement, as bobbing duration was similar between intact individuals and those missing legs. Together, these data provide novel observational and experimental insights into the drivers of collective behavior in animals. While individual variation in morphological conditions does not affect bobbing in these understudied arachnids, variability in group size and the triggering stimuli impacted their engagement in movement behavioral defenses.

Abstract Image

类群和振动:类群大小的影响,触发刺激,和腿的损失在一种蛛形动物的上下浮动
跨类群的动物形成群体,增强防御能力是其中一个好处。群居动物的一些防御行为涉及身体运动。然而,这些行为是如何被触发的,以及个体之间的形态变化如何影响它们仍然未知。在这个项目中,我们通过野外观察和实验室实验,在一种蛛形纲(Prionostemma sp.2)中探索了摆动的三种驱动因素——一种被认为是防御反应的上下振动行为。首先,我们探索了不同数量个体的群体中摆动时间的变化,因为动物可以调节它们在这种行为中的参与,以确保成功的捕食者威慑行为。我们发现,随着群体规模的增加,摇摆的持续时间也在增加。其次,我们探索了不同的触发刺激的影响,这些刺激可能代表了捕食者接近的自然场景。我们发现触摸刺激(轻触棍棒)比气流刺激(轻击)触发的摆动时间更长。第三,我们探索了个体的腿状况(当他们被发现时,他们是否有8条腿或更少的腿)是否会影响他们参与这种行为。我们发现,腿状况的变化并不影响它们的防御行为,因为在完好的个体和失去腿的个体之间,上下摆动的时间是相似的。总之,这些数据为动物集体行为的驱动因素提供了新的观察和实验见解。虽然形态条件的个体差异不影响这些未被研究的蛛形纲动物的摆动,但群体大小和触发刺激的变化影响了它们参与运动行为防御。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethology
Ethology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
89
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International in scope, Ethology publishes original research on behaviour including physiological mechanisms, function, and evolution. The Journal addresses behaviour in all species, from slime moulds to humans. Experimental research is preferred, both from the field and the lab, which is grounded in a theoretical framework. The section ''Perspectives and Current Debates'' provides an overview of the field and may include theoretical investigations and essays on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信